Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 23:3 (2016) ► pp. 279304


Corpus de referencia del español actual. Real Academia Española: Banco de datos. Available online at http://​corpus​.rae​.es​/creanet​.html.


Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1998Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues de l’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 193–257. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Burnham, Kenneth P. & David R. Anderson
2002Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Cifuentes, José Luis
1996Estructuras locales de base personalEstructuras locales de base personal . In José Luis Cifuentes & Jesús Llopis (eds.), Complemento indirecto y complemento de lugar: Estructuras locales de base personal en español, 74–181. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
2004Verbos locales estativos en español. In José Luis Cifuentes & Carmen Marimón (eds.), Estudios de Lingüística: el Verbo, 73–118. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
Comer, Marie, Renata Enghels & Clara Vanderschueren
2015De verbos de colocación a pseudo-copulativos: Procesos de gramaticalización en los cuasi-sinónimos poner/meter y pôr/meter en español y en portugués. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie131(2). 335–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crego García, María
2000El complemento locativo en español: Los verbos de movimiento y su combinatoria sintáctico-semántica. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2003Typology and universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2012Verbs: Aspect and clausal structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2008Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua 118. 141–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar
2010Structuring the lexicon. A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enghels, Renata & Marlies Jansegers
2013On the cross-linguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics 51(5). 957–991. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enghels, Renata & Eugeen Roegiest
2014Contrasting the syntax and semantics of negative causation: The apparent similarity of Spanish and Portuguese. Languages in Contrast 14(2). 278–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin & Alexandru Mardale
2012The pace of grammaticalization and the evolution of prepositional systems: Data from Romance. Folia Linguistica 46. 303–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
1999Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1317–1398. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010The doctor and the semantician. In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 63–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Dylan & Kerstin Fischer
2010Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan
2006Corpus-based methods and Cognitive Semantics: The many senses of to run . In Stefan Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 57–99. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Statistics for linguistics with R, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura
2013Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamiroy, Béatrice
1987Les verbes de mouvement emplois figurés et extensions métaphoriques. Langue française 76. 41–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Ricardo
2000Conceptual distance and transitivity increase in Spanish reflexives. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 153–185. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2014R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing. Available online at http://​www​.R​-project​.org.Google Scholar
Roegiest, Eugeen
1999Objet direct prépositionnel ou objet indirect en espagnol. Verbum 21(1). 67–80.Google Scholar
Silva, Augusto Soares da
2012Stages of grammaticalization of causative verbs and constructions in Portuguese, Spanish, French and Italian. Folia Linguistica 46(2). 513–552.Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk & Dirk Geeraerts
2009Causes for causatives: The case of Dutch doen and laten . In Ted Sanders & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 173–204. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic descriptions, 57–149. New York, NY: CUP.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17. 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000aToward a Cognitive Semantics I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000bToward a Cognitive Semantics II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Mutsumi
1999Animacy and reference. A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kocher, Anna
2018. Epistemic and evidential modification in Spanish and Portuguese. Languages in Contrast 18:1  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.