Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 24:2 (2017) ► pp. 139165


The modification of compound nouns by three adjectives

[ p. 161 ]References

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman
2004Beyond morphology. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alegre, María A. & Peter Gordon
1996Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition 60. 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1988Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24. 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1978The grammar of nominal compounding. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1932Deutsche Syntax: Band 4: Wortstellung. Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie J.
2011At the boundary of morphology and syntax: Noun noun constructions in English. In Alexandra Galeni, Glyn Hicks & George Tsoulas (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces, 137–167. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belnap, R. Kirk
1999A new perspective on the history of Arabic variation in marking agreement with plural heads. Folia Linguistica 33. 169–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas
2011The modification of compounds by attributive adjectives. Language Sciences 33. 725–737. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014How nominal compounds are modified by two adjectives. Folia Linguistica 48. 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas, Sabine Helmer, Marion Neubauer & Arne Lohmann
2012Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive analysis. Linguistics 50. 269–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Kathryn
1987An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language 26. 119–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carnie, Andrew
2008Constituent structure. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carroll, John M.
1979Complex nominals: phrasal embedding in lexical structure. Linguistics 17. 863–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, Kiel & Fernanda Ferreira
2005Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition 98. 105–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2003Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Matthew H., William D. Marslen-Wilson & M. Gareth Gaskell
2002Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28. 218–244.Google Scholar
Gagné, Christina
2001Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27. 236–254.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward
1998Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John
1976An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2. 23–68.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1986A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Henson, Richard N. A., Dennis G. Norris, Michael P. A. Page & Alan D. Baddeley
1996Unchained memory: Error patterns rule out chaining models of immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49(A). 80–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 162 ]
Isel, Frédéric, Thomas C. Gunter & Angela D. Friederici
2003Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29. 277–288.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–99.Google Scholar
Koester, Dirk, Thomas C. Gunter, Susanne Wagner & Angela D. Friederici
2004Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16. 1647–1668. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1991 Promise and the theory of control. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 103–139.Google Scholar
Libben, Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo Bom Yoon & Dominiek Sandra
2003Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 84. 50–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Richard Sproat
1992The stress and structure of modified noun phrases in English. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 131–181. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1992Deconstructing morphology. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Neal J. Perlmutter & Mark S. Seidenberg
1994The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101. 676–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marelli, Marco, Davide Crepaldi & Claudio Luzzatti
2009Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. The Mental Lexicon 4. 430–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, Masataka & Satoru Saito
2014Within-word serial order control: Adjacent mora exchange and serial position effects in repeated single-word production. Cognition 131. 415–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Matthew J. Traxler
1998Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27. 940–961.Google Scholar
Prat-Sala, Mercè & Holly P. Branigan
2000Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 42. 168–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1973The Penthouse Principle and the order of constituents. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the 9th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Slattery, Timothy J., Patrick Sturt, Kiel Christianson, Masaya Yoshida & Fernanda Ferreira
2013Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language 69. 104–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat & Gail McKoon
1991A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67. 439–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Pienie
1994The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes 9. 341–368. Crossref[ p. 163 ]Google Scholar