Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 24:2 (2017) ► pp.196–233

We’re talking about semantics here

Axiological condensation in the South African parliament

| Rhodes University
| Rhodes University
This article describes how procedural knowledge is produced in a meeting of the South African parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Transport, using concepts from Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Legitimation Code Theory (LCT). Members of this committee argue over whether or not to amend a draft committee report and in the process co-construct procedural norms for future committee meetings. Participants on both sides of the argument use axiological condensation, in which actions and ideas are associated with each other and charged with a particular moral or affective value (Maton 2014: 130) to portray their version of the procedure to be followed as morally superior to that of their opponents. They also use axiological rarefaction (Maton 2014: 130) to reinforce their positions by making apparent concessions to those on the other side of the argument. This is revealed through an analysis of the coupling of ideation and Appraisal (Martin 2000: 161) in the logogenetic unfolding of members’ talk, combined with elements of Interactional Sociolinguistics (Gumperz 1982). The analysis suggests that axiological condensation and rarefaction in this meeting reflect competing visions of what it means to be ‘pro-democracy’ in post-apartheid South Africa.
Article outline
  • 1.Knowledge-building in the South African parliament
  • 2.Recontextualization and constellations
  • 3.Investigating knowledge production in the South African parliament
    • 3.1The South African parliament as context
    • 3.2Collecting data in parliament
    • 3.3Enacting axiological condensation and rarefaction in language
  • 4.Axiological condensation and rarefaction in a committee meeting
    • 4.1Discovery of difference of opinion
    • 4.2Supporting arguments on either side
    • 4.3Proposal and rejection of changes in wording
    • 4.4Cosmologies
    • 4.5The outcome
  • 5.Conclusion: Talking about Semantics in parliament
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 10 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.2.03sie
References (31)
References
Almutairi, Bandar A. A. 2014. Visualizing evaluative language in relation to constructing identity in English editorials and op-eds. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika & James R. Martin (eds.). 2010. New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil B. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique, revised edn. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
2003. Class, Codes and Control Volume IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Jager, Nicola. 2009. No ‘new’ ANC? Politikon 36(2). 275–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and power. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2013. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joubert, Jan-Jan. 2015. Order! Order! Can Zuma steal the SONA show from Malema? Times Live. Available online at [URL].
Knight, Naomi K. 2010. Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), 35–58.Google Scholar
Macnaught, Lucy, Karl Maton, James R. Martin & Erika Matruglio. 2013. Jointly constructing semantic waves: Implications for teacher training. Linguistics & Education 24(1). 50–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1993. Technology, bureaucracy and schooling: Discursive resources and control. Cultural Dynamics 6(1). 84–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010. Semantic variation: Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), 1–34.Google Scholar
2011. Bridging troubled waters: Interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick. In Frances Christie & Karl Maton (eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives, 35–61. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Melbourne: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maton, Karl. 2013. Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics & Education 24(1). 8–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matruglio, Erika, Karl Maton & James R. Martin. 2013. Time travel: The role of temporality in enabling semantic waves in secondary school teaching. Linguistics & Education 24(1). 38–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mthembu, Bongani. 2006. Travelgate fraudster says crime was ‘trivial’. IOL News. Available online at [URL].
Ramagaga, Tizina. 2009. The future of opposition parties after the recall of Mbeki. Available online at [URL].
Rampton, Ben, Karin Tusting, Janet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese & Vally Lytra. 2004. UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. Available online at [URL].
Siebörger, Ian. 2012. Literacy, orality and recontextualization in the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa: An ethnographic study. Grahamstown: Rhodes University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Siebörger, Ian & Ralph D. Adendorff. 2015a. Black-boxing and the politics of oversight in the South African parliament. In Mirjana Dedaić (ed.), Singing, speaking and writing politics: South African political discourses, 43–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. Resemiotizing concerns from constituencies in the South African parliament. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(2). 171–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenglin, Maree. 2004. Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensional space. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Southern, Neil. 2011. Political opposition and the challenges of a dominant party system: The Democratic Alliance in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 29(3). 281–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Len. 1999. Developing critical understanding of the specialised language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 42(7). 508–521.Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter. 1998. Technicality and abstraction in social science. In James R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 297–326. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media Society 13(5). 788–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Siebörger, Ian & Ralph D. Adendorff
2023. Development of a translation device for axiological-semantic density in political news articles: wording and charging. Text & Talk 43:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.