A semiotic model for the description of levels in conjunction
External, internal-modal and internal-speech functional
Jean-Christophe Verstraete | Research assistant of the Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (Belgium)
This paper attempts to develop a comprehensive model for the problem of internal vs. external conjunction (Halliday & Hasan 1976). It is first argued that the distinction between internal and external conjunction is not merely a matter of semantics, but that the two types are semiotically significant categories. By postulating that internal and external conjunction are cryptotypically anchored in the speaker-encoding vs. content-related grammar of their main clause, it can be explained why and how syntactic criteria like clefting or nominalization 'react' to the semantic distinction between the two types of conjunction. Secondly, it is argued that the internal category should be subdivided into two grammatically distinct types of conjunction, which are related to the modal and the speech functional grammar of their main clause. Finally, this analysis is used to propose a sharper delineation of the modal and the speech functional subtypes of the internal category.
2018. Being-clauses in Historical Corpora and the US Second Amendment. English Studies 99:3 ► pp. 325 ff.
Sanders, José, Ted Sanders & Eve Sweetser
2012. Responsible subjects and discourse causality. How mental spaces and perspective help identifying subjectivity in Dutch backward causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 44:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Stukker, Ninke & Ted Sanders
2012. Subjectivity and prototype structure in causal connectives: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 44:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Ted Sanders
2011. Discovering domains – On the acquisition of causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics 43:6 ► pp. 1645 ff.
Simard, Candide & Eva Schultze-Berndt
2011. Chapter 7. Documentary linguistics and prosodic evidence for the syntax of spoken language. In Documenting Endangered Languages, ► pp. 151 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2009. Typology of Ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1 ► pp. 480 ff.
Butler, Christopher S. & Miriam Taverniers
2008. Introduction. Linguistics 46:4
Rossette, Fiona
2008. “Reading Between the Clauses”: an Exploration of Implicit Inter-clausal Relations in English. Anglophonia Caliban/Sigma :12 (24) ► pp. 219 ff.
Taverniers, Miriam
2008. Interpersonal grammatical metaphor as double scoping and double grounding. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Heycock, Caroline
2006. Embedded Root Phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 174 ff.
Pander Maat, H. & T. Sanders
2006. Connectives in Text. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 33 ff.
Gross, Gaston & Michele Prandi
2004. Bibliographie. In La finalité [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 259 ff.
WHITE, P. R. R.
2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23:2
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2001. Subjective and objective modality: interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33:10 ► pp. 1505 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2002. The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. <i>WORD</i> 53:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2004. Initial and final position for adverbial clauses in English: the constructional basis of the discursive and syntactic differences. Linguistics 42:4
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2008. The status of purpose, reason, and intended endpoint in the typology of complex sentences: implications for layered models of clause structure. Linguistics 46:4
[no author supplied]
2006. Consolidated References. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ► pp. 439 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.