Review article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 9:1 (2002) ► pp.6186
Borland, A.
(1999) Functional Grammar and First Language Acquisition. Unpublished MA Thesis. Amsterdam: Department of General Linguistics, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Butler, C. S.
(1985) Systemic linguistics: Theory and applications. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
(1989) Systemic models: unity, diversity and change. Word 40.1/2: 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Criteria of adequacy in functional grammars, with particular reference to Systemic Functional Grammar. Network 171: 61–9.Google Scholar
in press) Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Caffarel, A., J. R. Martin and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
forthcoming) Language typology: A functional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logo
Dik, S. C.
(1997a) The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. 2nd ed. Ed. by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1997b) The theory of functional grammar. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. Ed. by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, R. P.
(1974–6) Some proposals for systemic syntax, Parts 1, 2 and 3. MALS Journal 1.2:1–15, 2.1: 43–68, 2.2: 36–68. (Reprinted 1981 as Some proposals for systemic syntax. Pontypridd: Polytechnic of Wales.)Google Scholar
(1980) Cognitive linguistics and social interaction: Towards an integrated model of a systemic functional grammar and the other components of a communicating mind. Heidelberg: Julius Groos & Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar
(1996) A Systemic Functional approachto complementation in English. In M. Berry, C. S. Butler, R. P. Fawcett and G. Huang (eds.) Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations. (Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 3. Advances in discourse processes, LVII.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 297–366.Google Scholar
(2000a) In place of Halliday’s ‘verbal group’, Part 1: Evidence from the problems of Halliday’s representations and the relative simplicity of the proposed alternative. Word 51.2: 157–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000b) In place of Halliday’s ‘verbal group’, Part 2: Evidence from generation, semantics, and interruptability. Word 51.3: 327–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press) Functional syntax handbook: Analyzing English at the level of form: London: Continuum.
forthcoming) Functional semantics handbook: Analyzing English at the level of meaning: London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1961) Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 171: 241–292. (Reprinted in part in Kress (ed.), 52–72.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1966) Some notes on “deep” grammar. Journal of Linguistics 21: 57–67. (Reprinted in part in Kress (ed.), 88–98.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1973) Explorations in the functions of language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
(1977) Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In T. Van Dijk and J. S. Petöfi (eds.) Grammars and descriptions. Berlin: de Gruyter. 176–225. (Abridged version reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday (1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold. 128–151.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994a) Introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
(1994b) Systemic theory. In R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.) The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. 4505–4508.Google Scholar
(1996) On grammar and grammatics. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran and D. Butt (eds.) Functional descriptions: Theory in practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
(1999) Construing language through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. and M. J. Pérez Quintero
(2001) Descriptive adequacy in Functional Grammar. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 421: 103–117.Google Scholar
Kress, G.
(ed.) (1976) Halliday: System and function in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and J. A. Bateman
(1991) Text generation and systemic-functional linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
McGregor, W. B.
(1997) Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., Jr.
(1990) Layered syntax in Role and Reference Grammar. In J. Nuyts, A. M. Bolkestein and C. Vet (eds.) Layers and levels of representation in language theory. (Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series, 131.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. and R. J. LaPolla
(1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
(1997) The use of grammar, the grammar of use. Functions of Language 4.2: 145–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schulz, Anke & Lise Fontaine
2019. The Cardiff Model of Functional Syntax. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 230 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.