Review article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 9:1 (2002) ► pp. 87102
Arnold, J., T. Wasow, A. Losongco and R. Ginstrom
(2000) Heaviness vs. newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 761: 28–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M. and S. Kemmer
(eds.) (2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Batistella, E.
(2000) Review of Newmeyer (1998). Journal of Linguistics 361: 431–439.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. and J. Aissen
(2002) Optimality and functionality: Objections and refutations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201: 81–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. and P. Hopper
(eds.) (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A.
(1999) The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginning of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, E.
(1995) Introduction: On linguistic sign theory. In E. Contini-Morava and B. Sussman Goldberg (eds.) Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory. Berlin: Mouton. 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, J. E.
(2000) Introduction. In D. G. Lockwood, P. H. Fries and J. E. Copeland (eds.) Functional approaches to language, culture and cognition: Papers in honor of Sydney M. Lamb. Amsterdam: Benjamins. xiii–xxiii. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(1995) Autonomy and functional linguistics. Language 711: 490–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cureton, R. D.
(2001) Review of Newmeyer (1998). Journal of English Linguistics 291: 72–78. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, M., E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan and K. Wheatley
(eds.) (1999) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dik, S.
(1986) On the notion “Functional explanation”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11–52. (Special issue on ‘Functional explanations in linguistics’) Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis, E. J.
(2002) Form and function in syntactic theory: a reaction to Newmeyer. Language Sciences 241: 29–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harder, P.
(1999) Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics. In Th. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton. 195–222. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. A.
(1993) The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(1999) Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181: 180–205.Google Scholar
(2000) Why can’t we talk to each other? Lingua 1101: 235–255. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A.
(1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Why are categories adjacent? Journal of Linguistics 371: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huck, G. J. and J. A. Goldsmith
(1995) Ideology and linguistic theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.
(1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, S.
(1999) Function, selection and innateness: The emergence oflanguage universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. and Ken-ichi Takami
(1997) Structural or functional accounts? In A. Kamio (ed.) Directions in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 221–249Academic Press Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1999) Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Th. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton. 13–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E.
(2000) Review of Newmeyer (1998). Language 761: 168–170.Google Scholar
Nettle, D.
(1999) Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(1980) Linguistic theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1983) Grammatical theory: Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Linguistic theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press. (Second, revised edition of Newmeyer (1980))Google Scholar
(1996) Generative linguistics: A historical perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1999a) Adaptation, optimality and functional explanation: Two serious problems. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181:235–237. (peer comment on Haspelmath 1999) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999b) Review of M. Tomasello (ed.) (1998) Journal of Linguistics 351: 651–655. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) The discrete nature of syntactic categories. Against a prototype-based account. In R. Borsley (ed.) The nature and function of syntactic categories. (Syntax and Semantics, 321.). San Diego: Academic Press. 221–250. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Three book-length studies of language evolution. Review article on Carstairs-McCarthy (1999), Kirby (1999) and Nettle (1999) Journal of Linguistics 361: 383–395. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) The Prague School and North American functionalist approaches to syntax. Journal of Linguistics 371: 101–126. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 231:187–229. Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally-based optimality-theoretic syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201: 43–80. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
to appear) Where is Functional Explanation? CLS 371.
Saussure, F. de
(1968 [1916]) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M.
(1996) Semantic syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stassen, L.
(1985) Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M.
(2000) Review of Newmeyer (1998). Studies in Language 241: 423–439. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(ed.) (1998) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague
, Vol. I1. Prague 1929.Google Scholar