Review article published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 9:1 (2002) ► pp.87–102
Review article
Frederick J. Newmeyer’s Language Form and Language Function
Reviewer
References (45)
Arnold, J., T. Wasow, A. Losongco and R. Ginstrom. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 761: 28–55. 
Barlow, M. and S. Kemmer (eds.) (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.
Batistella, E. (2000). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Journal of Linguistics 361: 431–439.
Bresnan, J. and J. Aissen. (2002). Optimality and functionality: Objections and refutations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201: 81–95.
Bybee, J. and P. Hopper (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginning of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Contini-Morava, E. (1995) Introduction: On linguistic sign theory. In E. Contini-Morava and B. Sussman Goldberg (eds.) Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory. Berlin: Mouton. 1–39.
Copeland, J. E. (2000) Introduction. In D. G. Lockwood, P. H. Fries and J. E. Copeland (eds.) Functional approaches to language, culture and cognition: Papers in honor of Sydney M. Lamb. Amsterdam: Benjamins. xiii–xxiii.
Croft, W. (1995). Autonomy and functional linguistics. Language 711: 490–532.
Cureton, R. D. (2001). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Journal of English Linguistics 291: 72–78.
Darnell, M., E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan and K. Wheatley (eds.) (1999). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dik, S. (1986). On the notion “Functional explanation”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11–52. (Special issue on ‘Functional explanations in linguistics’)
Francis, E. J. (2002). Form and function in syntactic theory: a reaction to Newmeyer. Language Sciences 241: 29–56.
Harder, P. (1999) Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics. In Th. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton. 195–222.
Harris, R. A. (1993). The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181: 180–205.
(2000). Why can’t we talk to each other? Lingua 1101: 235–255.
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). Why are categories adjacent? Journal of Linguistics 371: 1–34.
Huck, G. J. and J. A. Goldsmith. (1995). Ideology and linguistic theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debate. London: Routledge.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirby, S. (1999). Function, selection and innateness: The emergence oflanguage universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuno, S. and Ken-ichi Takami. (1997) Structural or functional accounts? In A. Kamio (ed.) Directions in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 221–249Academic Press
Langacker, R. (1999) Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Th. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton. 13–93.
(2000). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.
Moravcsik, E. (2000). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Language 761: 168–170.
Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newmeyer, F. J. (1980). Linguistic theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press.
(1983). Grammatical theory: Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(1986). Linguistic theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press. (Second, revised edition of Newmeyer. (1980))
(1996). Generative linguistics: A historical perspective. London: Routledge.
(1999a). Adaptation, optimality and functional explanation: Two serious problems. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181:235–237. (peer comment on Haspelmath. 1999).
(1999b) Review of M. Tomasello (ed.) (1998). Journal of Linguistics 351: 651–655.
(2000a) The discrete nature of syntactic categories. Against a prototype-based account. In R. Borsley (ed.) The nature and function of syntactic categories. (Syntax and Semantics, 321.). San Diego: Academic Press. 221–250.
(2000b). Three book-length studies of language evolution. Review article on Carstairs-McCarthy. (1999), Kirby. (1999) and Nettle. (1999). Journal of Linguistics 361: 383–395.
(2001a). The Prague School and North American functionalist approaches to syntax. Journal of Linguistics 371: 101–126.
(2001b). Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 231:187–229. .
. (2002). Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally-based optimality-theoretic syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201: 43–80.
(to appear) Where is Functional Explanation? CLS 371.
Saussure, F. de. (1968 [1916]) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Seuren, P. A. M. (1996). Semantic syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stassen, L. (1985). Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tallerman, M. (2000). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Studies in Language 241: 423–439.
Tomasello, M. (ed.) (1998). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, Vol. I1. Prague, 1929.