Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 11:2 (2013) ► pp.7593
References (19)
References
Bassnett, S., & Lefevere, A. (1990). Translation, history and culture London, England: Pinter.Google Scholar
Bateni, M. R. (Ed.) (2007). (3rd ed.). Tehran: Farhang Moaser.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London, England: Longman.Google Scholar
(1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Farahzad, F. (2008). Translation as an intertextual practice. Perspectives, 16(3), 125–131.Google Scholar
(2009). Translation criticism: A CDA approach. Translation Studies, 6(24), 39–47.Google Scholar
Fazeli, M. (2009). Theoretical insights on the sociology of translation [Bineshhaye nazari dar bareye jameeshenasiye tarjome]. Translation Studies, 7(25), 29–46.Google Scholar
Haghshenas, A. M. (Ed.) (2001). Farhang moaser English-Persian millennium dictionary. Tehran, Iran: Farahang Moaser Publishing.Google Scholar
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1997). The translator as communicator. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hermans, T. (1985). The manipulation of literature: Studies in literary translation. London, England: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newmark, P. (1981). Approaches to translation. Oxford, England: Pergamon.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
(2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Retrieved May 01, 2008, from [URL]
Venuti, L. (1995). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about - A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar