Article published In:
FORUMVol. 11:2 (2013) ► pp.175–199
Translation Process as a Conceptual Metaphor
Text (ST) – Process (is) – Text (TT)
References (24)
Ahrenberg, L., & Tarvi, L. (2013). Natural language processing for the translation class. Proceedings of the second workshop on NLP for computer-assisted language learning at NODALIDA 2013 (May 22, Oslo) NEALT Proceedings Series 17/Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 861: 1–10. [URL].
Boyd, B. (2009). On the Origin of Stories. Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Cambridge, Massachusetts – London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 
Chesterman, A. (1996). On Similarity. Target, 8 (1) 1996, 159–164.
(1997). Memes of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(2008). Translation Data Problems. In J. Lindstead et al. (Eds.) Festshrift in Honour of Professor Arto Mustajoki on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, 17–26. Helsinki: Slavica Helsingiensia 35.
Halverson, S. (1998). Concepts and Categories in Translation Studies. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Hofstadter, D. (1998). To Seek Whence Cometh a Sequence. In Douglas Hofstadter (ed.) Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, 13–87. New York: Penguin Books.
Holmes, J. S. (1988). Translated! Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Honkela, T. et al. (2010). GIGA: Grounded Intersubjective Concept Analysis: A Method for Enhancing Mutual Understanding and Participation. Espoo: Aalto University School of Science and Technology.
Jakobson, R. (1990). On Language L. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 2003 [1980]. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Milic, L. T. (1971). Rhetorical Choice and Stylistic Option: the Conscious and he Unconscious Poles. In S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: a Symposium, 77–94. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Panther, K-U. & Padden, G. (1999). Introduction. In K-U. Panther & G. Pädden (eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought (papers presented at a workshop held June 23-24, 1996, Hamburg University), 1–16. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pierini, P. (2007). Simile in English: from description to translation. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Communicacíon (clac) ([URL]) 291, 21–43.
Pym, A. (1998). Method in Translation History. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
Sovran, T. (1992). Between Similarity and Sameness. Journal of Pragmatics 18:4, 329–344.
Tarvi, L. (2004). Comparative Translation assessment: Quantifying Quality. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
(2010). From ‘Haute Couture’ To ‘Prêt-à-Porter’, Or How Theory Can Be ‘Vulgarized”. In Garant, M. (ed.) Helsinki Department of Translation Studies Publications III, “Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Translation Studies, 133–159.
Tymoczko, M. (1998). “Computerized Corpora and the Future of Translation Studies.” Meta 43 (4), 652–659.
Vinay, J-P. & Darbelnet, J. 1995 [1958]) Comparative Stylistics of French and English. A Methodology for Translation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilson. E. O. (1998). Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
Wolff, Michael 2010. Ringside at the Web Fight. Vanity Fair, No 542, March 2010, 108–110.