Cover not available
Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp.148–163

Morphological shift of hyperbolic patterns in the Quran, with reference to English translation

| Arab Open University
| Sohar University
| Palestine Ahliya University
This study addresses the use of hyperbole in the Quran at the word level and its English translation. It investigates the morphological shift of hyperbolic patterns such as ‘Fa’uul (فعول), Fa’eel (فعيل) and Fa’aal’ (فعال) and their corresponding English translations. We attempt to determine the implications underlying the translation strategies for the translation quality of the data under study. Under this circumstance, the translator applied a series of translation strategies, such as literal translation, paraphrase, transposition, and morphological strategies, with transposition being the most employed strategy. Such strategies were in some cases a problem for the functions of the Quranic hyperboles. As such, the translation quality was occasionally poor.
Keywords: hyperbole, morphological shift, quality, Quran, strategy, translation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The language of the Quran
  • 3.An overview of hyperbole
  • 4.Hyperbole in Arabic
    • 4.1The active participle (Ismu al-Fa’el/اسم الفاعل)
    • 4.2Morphological shift of hyperbolic patterns in the Quran
    • 4.3How to derive hyperbolic patterns
  • 5.Method
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Fa’uul-Fa’aal
    • 6.2Fa’uul-Fa’eel
    • 6.3Fa’aal-Fa’uul
    • 6.4Fa’aal- Fa’eel
    • 6.5Fa’aal-Fa’uul
    • 6.6Fa’eel-Fa’uul
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 19 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.21010.naj
References (36)
References
Abdel Haleem, Muhammad. 2010. Understanding the Quran: Themes and style. I.B. TAURIS.Google Scholar
Abdel-Wali, Mohammad. 2007. “The Loss in the Translation of the Qur`an.” Translation Journal, 11(2), 120–125. [URL]
Ali, Ahmed. 2001. Al- Quran ’n: A Contemporary Translation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Andalusi, Jamal Al-Din Muhammad Ibn Abdullah. 1990. Sharh Al-Tashil Li-Ibn Malik. Cairo: Hajar for Publication.Google Scholar
Al-Askari, Abu Hilal. 1998. As-Sina’atin: al-Kitabah wa As-Shi’r. Beirut: al-Maktaba al-Asriyah.Google Scholar
Al-Hamlawi, Ahmad. 1982. Shatha al-Urfi Fi Fan al-Sarfi. Daru al-Fikr.Google Scholar
Al-Hashemi, Al-Sayed Ahmad. 2000. Al-Qawa’id Al-Asasiyyah Li-Lughah Al-Arabiya. Beirut: Muasasat Al-Ma’arif.Google Scholar
Al-Qazwini, Muhammad. 2003. Al-Idah fi ulum al-Balagah. Beirut: Daru al-kutub al-ilmiyah.Google Scholar
Al-Sakkaki, Yusuf. 1987. Miftah Al-Ulum. 2nd ed. Beirut: Daru al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.Google Scholar
Ar-Rumani, Ali. 1976. An-Nukat fi I’gaz al-Quran al-Karim. Cairo: Daru-al-Ma’arif.Google Scholar
Assamirra’i, Fadhil. 1981. Ma’ani AL-Abniyah Fi Al-Arabiyah. 1st ed. Amman: Dar Ammar for Printing & Publishing.Google Scholar
Burgers, Christina., Brugman, Britta C., Lavalette, Kiki Y., and Steen, Gerard J. 2016. “HIP: A Method for Linguistic Hyperbole Identification in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol, 31(3): 163–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn., and Wearing, Catherine. 2015. “Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony.” Journal of Pragmatics (79) 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2010. “ Hyperbole in English: a corpus-based study of exaggeration .” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, C. 2011. Hyperbole in English. A corpus-based study of exaggeration. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, William L. 1986. The problems of miracles: A historical and philosophical perspective. Edited by David Wenham, and Craig Blomberg. VI1, Sheffield: JSOT Press.Google Scholar
Dung, Tran T. 2011. A Study on syntactic, semantic and pragmatic features of exaggeration in English and Vietnamese. M.A. Thesis, University of Danang.
El-Zeiny, Iman. 2009. “The Translation of the Qur`anic ambiguity: A linguistic contrastive study.” Saudi Association of Languages & Translation, (pp. 33–57).Google Scholar
Hassan, Abbas. 1980. Al-Nahw Al-Wafi. Dar al-Ma’arif.Google Scholar
Ibn-Al-Muataz, Abdullah. 1982. Al-Badi’. 3rd ed. Cairo: Dar al-Masirah.Google Scholar
Ibn Hisham, Abdullah. 1965. Sharh Shuthur al-Thahab fi Ma’rifat kalam l-Arab. Dar Egypt: Ihiya’a al-Turath al-Arabi.Google Scholar
Ibn Jâfar, Qudama. 1963. Naqd as-Shi’r. Cairo: Maktabat ?al-KhƗnžƯ.Google Scholar
Ibn Jinni, Othman. 1985. Sirr-u Sina’at al-Ai’raab. Damascus: Dar Al-Qalam.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michal., and Carter, Ronald. 2004. Theres millions of them: hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (2): 149–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mora, Laura. (2009). "All or nothing: a semantic analysis of hyperbole." Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 41, 25-35.Google Scholar
Naher, Hadi. 1998. Assarf Al-Wafi Dirasa Wasfiyyah Tatbiqeyah. Irbid: Dar Al-Amal for Printing & Publishing.Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter. 1998. A textbook of translation. New York: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Radwan, S. 1987. Al-Wadih fi Al-Nahw. Dar Al-Kutub.Google Scholar
Saleh, Kamal (2005): Siyaʁ AL-Mubalaʁa Wa Taraʔiqaha Fi Al Quran AL-Kareem: dirasah Ihsaeyyah Sarfiyya Dilaliyyah. Al-Najah National University.Google Scholar
Sibawayh, Amr. 1999. Al-Kitab. Dar Al-Kutub Beirut: al-Ilmiyah.Google Scholar
Stern, Josef. 2000. Metaphor in Context. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thackston, Wheeler M. 1984. An Introduction to Koranic Arabic. Cambridge: Mass: Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations.Google Scholar
Yacoub, Emile Bade’. 1996. Dictionary of Arabic Meters. Al-Riad: A’alam Al-Kutub.Google Scholar
Yang, Cheng-hu. 2002. “Reclassification of Figures of Speech in the Light of Metaphorical Study.” Journal of Sichuan International Studies University 1(18): 90–92.Google Scholar
Yusuf Ali, Abdullah. 2006. The Meaning of the Nobel Quran. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ma, Fei & Jiguo Yu
2022. Application of Convolutional Neural Network Based on Deep Learning in College English Translation Teaching Management. Mobile Information Systems 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Song, Bo & Yanyi Rao
2022. English Language Intelligent Translation System Based on 3D Visualization Technology. Mobile Information Systems 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Lijuan & Zhao kaifa
2022. [Retracted] A Novel English Translation Model in Complex Environments Using Two‐Stream Convolutional Neural Networks. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2022:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.