Cover not available
Article published In:
Ideology and Cross-Cultural Encounters - Research and Methodology in Translation and Interpreting / Idéologie et les rencontres des cultures - recherche et méthodologie en traduction et interprétation
[FORUM 7:1] 2009
► pp. 1–37

UIn at the Deep End. Objectivity, Overinterpretation and Ideology Patterns in Translation

| University of Salamanca, Senior Lecture
L’intégration croissante des approches sociales et linguistiques en traductologie s’accompagne de nombreuses études portant sur l’idéologie. Cependant le terme “idéologie” n’est pas pris dans le même sens par tous et les études qui lui sont consacrées ne se rejoignent pas nécessairement. Le présent article examine certaines des questions soulevées par l’étude de l’idéologie en traduction au cours de la dernière décennie et des tendances connexes.
Keywords: Ideology, critical discourse analysis, objectivity, hermeneutics, overinterpretation
Published online: 1 April 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.7.1.01cor
References (56)
Audi, R. (1998) [2003]. Epistemology. A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge. London and New York: Routledge, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2006). Translation and Conflict. A Narrative Account. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calzada Pérez, M. (ed.) (2003). A Propos of Ideology. Translation Studies on Ideology - Ideologies in Translation Studies. Manchester: St. JeromeGoogle Scholar
(2007a). Transitivity in Translating. The interdependence of texture and context. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2007b). “Translators and Translation Studies. Translators as Inocultators of Resistance”. The Translator 13, 2, 243–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1974). “Evolutionary Epistemology”, in P. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, I1, Lasalle 413-63.Google Scholar
Cheung, M. P. Y. (2002). “Power and Ideology in Translation Research in Twentieth-Century China. An Analysis of Three Seminal Works”. In Hermans, T. (ed.), Crosscultural Transgressions. Research Models in Translation Studies II. Historical and Ideological Issues. Manchester: St Jerome, 143–164.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2009). “We cannot live by scepticism alone”, Nature 4581, 30-1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. (1992). “In Defence of Overinterpretation”, in Eco, Umberto, Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 109–126.Google Scholar
Cunico, S. & Munday, J. (eds.) (2007). Translation and Ideology: Encounters and Clashes. Special issue of The Translator (Volume 13/21, 2007). Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Experiences in Translation. Toronto / Buffalo / London: University of Toronto Press. Translated by Alastair McEwen.Google Scholar
Fawcett, P. (1998). ‘Ideology and Translation’, in Baker (ed.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies, first edition, 106–7.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1987). “Ciencia: ¿grupo de presión política o instrumento de investigación?”, in Adiós a la razón. Madrid: Tecnos, 103–122.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1996). ‘On Critical Linguistics’, in Caldas-Coulthard, A.R. & Coulthard, M. (eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in critical discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2–14.Google Scholar
Gentzler, E. (1993). Contemporary Translation Theories. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gil Bardají, A. (in press, 2009). Traducir al-Andalus. El discurso del Otro en el arabismo español (de Conde a García Gómez). Ceredigion: The Erwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1986 [1974]). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Forms of Talk, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gorlée, D. L. (1994). Semiotics and the Problem of Translation,with Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Amsterdam / Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Halliday, F. (1993). “‘Orientalism’ and Its Critics”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20 (2), 145–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, K. (2003). ‘“Events” and “Horizons”: Reading Ideology in the “Bindings” of Translations’, in Maria Calzada Perez (ed.) Apropos of Ideology — Translation Studies on Ideology- Ideologies in Translation Studies, Manchester: St Jerome Publishing, pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1997). The Translator as Communicator. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irwin, R. (1999). “Oriental discourses in Orientalism”, Middle Eastern Lectures 31, 87–110.Google Scholar
(2007). For Lust of Knowing. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Jäger, S. (2001) [2003]. “Discurso y conocimiento: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos de la crítica del discurso y del análisis de dispositivos”, in Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa. Spanish translation Tomás Fernández Aúz and Beatriz Eguíbar. (originally published as Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, 2001), 61–100.Google Scholar
Kovala, U. (1996). “Translations, Paratextual Mediation, and Ideological Closure”, Target 8(1): 119–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (1996). “Representational Resources and the Production of Subjectivity. Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society” in Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen-Rosa; Coulthard, Malcolm (eds.). Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 15–31.Google Scholar
Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame, London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Mason, I. (1995). “Ideology in Translation” in Robert de Beaugrande; Abdulla Shunnaq and Mohammed H. Heliel (eds.). Language, Discourse and Translation in the West and Middle East. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 23–34.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. (2001) [2003]. “Entre la teoría, el método y la política: la ubicación de los enfoques relacionados con el ACD”, in Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.), Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa. Spanish translation Tomás Fernández Aúz and Beatriz Eguíbar. (originally published as Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, 2001), 35–60.Google Scholar
Munday, J. (2007). “Translation and Ideology: A Textual Approach”, The Translator 13 (2), 195–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacho, J. “Cultura como crisis. Una interpretación del falsacionismo popperiano”, in Perona, Ángeles J. (ed.) (2008). Contrastando a Popper. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 151–196.Google Scholar
Popper 1972 [2001]. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. Spanish translation Carlos Solís Santos, Conocimiento objetivo: un enfoque evolucionista. Madrid: Tecnos, 1974 (fourth revised edition 2001).Google Scholar
Potter, J. & Edwards, D. (1990). “Nigel Lawson's Tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 201, 24–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. (1996a). Representing Reality. London: Sage.Google Scholar
(1996b). “Discourse Analysis and Constructionist Approaches: Theoretical background”, in John T.E. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Leicester; BPS Books.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1992). “The Pragmatist’s Progress”, in Eco, U., Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 89–108.Google Scholar
Sardar, Z. (1999). Concepts in Social Sciences: Orientalism. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Seguinot, C. (1988). ‘Translating the Ideology of Science: The Example of the Work of Alfred Tomatis’, TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Redaction 1(1): 103–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (ed) (2003). Controversies in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Somers, M. R. & Gibson, G. D. (1994). ‘Reclaiming the Epistemological “Other”: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity’, in Craig Calhoun (ed.) Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, Oxford and Cambridge MA: Blackwell, 37–99.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1997). “Whorf’s Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)”, in Ryan, A. and Wray, A. (eds.), Evolving Models of Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 100–116.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (ed.) (1993). Framing in Discourse, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Truzzi, M. (1983) [1989]. “Sherlock Holmes: experto en psicología social aplicada”, in Umberto Eco and Thomas A. Sebeok, The Sign of Three. Indiana University Press; Sp. translation Esther Busquets, El signo de los tres, Barcelona: Lumen, 82–115.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, M. (1999), “Post-colonial writing and literary translation”, in Bassnett, S.; Trivedi, H., Postcolonial Translation: Theory and Practice. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2003). “Ideology and the Position of the Translator: In What Sense is a Translator ‘In Between’?”, in Maria Calzada Perez (ed) Apropos of Ideology: Translation Studies on Ideology - Ideologies in Translation Studies, Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
(2007), Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage.Google Scholar
(2003). Ideología y discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
van Nieuwenhujze, C. A. O. (1979). “Palestinian Politician-Scholar Hits Back Hard” Bibliotheca Oricntalis, xxxvi, no. 1/2 (Januari-Maart 1979), 10–26.Google Scholar
Venuti, L. (ed.) (1992). Rethinking Translation: Discourse, subjectivity, ideology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vidal Claramonte, Ma C. Á. (2005). En los límites de la traducción. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
Widdowson. H. G. (2003). “Discourse Analysis: A critical view”, in Seidlhofer, Barbara, Controversies in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OUP, 132–145.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2007), Discourse Analysis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001) [2003]. “El enfoque histórico del discurso”, in Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.), Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa. Spanish translation Tomás Fernández Aúz and Beatriz Eguíbar. (originally published as Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, 2001), 101–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Manoel, Liliana, Ana Cristina Costa & Pedro Cabral
2022. Voter Turnout in Portugal: A Geographical Perspective. Papers in Applied Geography 8:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Ozen, Ilhan Can & Kerem Ozan Kalkan
2017. Spatial analysis of contemporary Turkish elections: a comprehensive approach. Turkish Studies 18:2 ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Bishop, Bradford H.
2014. Focusing Events and Public Opinion: Evidence from the Deepwater Horizon Disaster. Political Behavior 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.