We introduce a three-dimensional model for irony research, which is an extension of Steen’s (2008, 2011) three-dimensional model of metaphor and similarly argues that the study of irony requires three distinct dimensions: (1) language, (2) thought and (3) communication. Irony in language requires the study of irony’s linguistic structure. Irony in thought focuses on the obligatory reversal of evaluation between the propositional and intended meaning of an ironic utterance. Irony in communication, finally, focuses on whether the literal meaning serves as a distinct referent in the meaning of the ironic utterance. Our model brings together contemporary research on irony and metaphor within one framework and can guide and inspire both theoretical and empirical research.
Akimoto, Y., Miyazawa, S., & Muramoto, T. (2012). Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context, and allocentric theory of mind. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 217–242.
Arendt, F. (2013). Dose‐dependent media priming effects of stereotypic newspaper articles on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 830–851.
Attardo, S. (2000a). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask, 12(1), 3–20.
Attardo, S. (2000b). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826.
Barbe, K. (1995). Irony in Context. Amsterdam (Netherlands): John Benjamins Publishing.
Beukeboom, C. J., Finkenauer, C., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 978–992.
Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2008). Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 583–607.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216.
Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566.
Burgers, C., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2016). Stereotype transmission and maintenance through interpersonal communication: The Irony Bias. Communication Research, 43(3), 414–441.
Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., Kelder, M., & Peeters, M. M. (2015). How sports fans forge intergroup competition through language: The case of verbal irony. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 435–457.
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative Framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430.
Burgers, C., & van Mulken, M. (2017). Humor markers. In S. Attardo (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (pp. 385–399). New York: Routledge.
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 186–205.
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2012a). Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(3), 231–242.
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2012b). Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(3), 290–310.
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the Pretense Theory of Irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126.
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513.
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretense. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretense, Possibility, and Fiction (pp. 111–133). Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press.
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1579–1599.
Fein, O., Yeari, M., & Giora, R. (2015). On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of sarcastic irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1), 1–32.
Fraenkel, T., & Schul, Y. (2008). The meaning of negated adjectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4), 517–540.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2012). Are ironic acts deliberate?. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 104–115.
Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
Giora, R., Balaban, N., Fein, O., & Alkabets, I. (2005). Negation as positivity in disguise. In H. L. Colston and A. N. Katz (Eds.). Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 233–258). Hillsdale, NJ (USA): Erlbaum.
Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 241–257.
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T. (1998). Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–102.
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313.
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O. (2017). The role of defaultness in affecting pleasure: The Optimal Innovation Hypothesis revisited. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(1), 1–18.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.
Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 447–463.
Kapogianni, E. (2016). The ironic operation: Revisiting the components of ironic meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 16–28.
Kovaz, D., Kreuz, R. J., & Riordan, M. A. (2013). Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging. Discourse Processes, 50(8), 598–615.
Kreuz, R. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and Applications (pp. 23–38). Mahwah, NJ (USA): Erlbaum.
Kreuz, R. J., Kassler, M. A., Coppenrath, L., & Allen, B. M. (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1685–1700.
Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127–143.
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 21–31.
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3–21.
Kunneman, F., Liebrecht, C., van Mulken, M., & van den Bosch, A. (2015). Signaling sarcasm: From hyperbole to hashtag. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 500–509.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL (USA): University of Chicago Press.
McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438.
Mialon, H. M., & Mialon, S. H. (2013). Go figure: The strategy of nonliteral speech. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 186–212.
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 95–104.
Partington, A. (2007). Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1547–1569.
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Quintilian (1959). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian: With an English Translation by H. E. Butler, MA (Vol. 3). London: William Heinemann (Original work published around AD 95).
Roncero, C., de Almeida, R. G., Martin, D. C., & de Caro, M. (2016). Aptness predicts metaphor preference in the lab and on the Internet. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(1), 31–46.
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 47–61.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the Use – Mention Distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York, NY (USA): Academic Press.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from non-irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806.
Williams, L. E., & Poehlman, T. A. (2017). Conceptualizing consciousness in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 231–251.
Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1), 53–76.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 249–287.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Ahrens, Kathleen, Christian Burgers & Yin Zhong
2024. Making the Unseen Seen: The Role of Signaling and Novelty in Rating Metaphors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 53:3
O’Dowd, Niamh A
2024. The potential of creative uses of metonymy for climate protest. Discourse & Society 35:3 ► pp. 360 ff.
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.