Chapter published in:
Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 127142
Abrams, M. J.
(1971) A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase & Fable
(1999) Ed. A. Room. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Burgers, C. & Steen, G. J.
this volume). Introducing a three-dimensional model of verbal irony: Irony in language, in thought, and in communication.
Clark, H. & Gerrig, R.
(1984) On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 121–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. & Gibbs, R.
(2002) Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol 17, 57–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
(2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, E. W.
(2007) Experimental tests of figurative meaning construction. In G. Radden, K. -M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.) Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 19–32). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. & Colston, H.
(2012) Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(1995) On Irony and Negation. Discourse Processes 19(2), 239–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) On our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O., & Mendelson, I.
(2015a) Default Sarcastic Interpretations: On the Priority of Nonsalient Interpretations. Discourse Processes 52(3), 173–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S. & Fein, O.
(2015b) Defaultness Reigns: The Case of Sarcasm. Metaphor & Symbol 30, 290–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Meytes, D., Tamir, A. Givoni, S. Heruti, V. & Fein, O.
this volume). Defaultness shines while affirmation pales: On idioms, sarcasm, and pleasure.
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and Conversation. In: P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.): Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) House of Commons Debate on the European Council in Maastricht 11 December 1991 (Hansard vol. 200, cc. 859–78). http://​hansard​.millbanksystems​.com​/commons​/1991​/dec​/11​/european​-council​-maastricht (accessed 22 January 2015).
Jorgensen, J., Miller, G., & Sperber, D.
(1984) Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 112–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. N., & Pexman, P. M.
(1997) Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 19–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M.
(1995) How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124, 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Major, J.
(2000) The Autobiography. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2004a) Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) The Heart of the European Body Politic. British and German Perspectives on Europe’s Central Organ . Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25 (5 & 6), 437–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The heart of Europe: Synchronic variation and historical trajectories of a Political Metaphor. In K. Fløttum (Ed.), Speaking of Europe: Approaches to complexity in European political discourse (pp. 135–150). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, S.
(2000) Straight from the heart – metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 195–213). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N.
(2000) Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 201–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F.
(2004) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roget’s International Thesaurus
(1996) Ed. R. L. Chapman. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
(2002) Eds. W. R. Trumble & A. Stevenson Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1981) Irony and the use – mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2011) What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World 1(1), 53–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D.
(2000) Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication. In D. Sperber (Ed.), Metaprepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective. (pp. 411–448). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D.
(1992) On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Explaining irony. In: Meaning and Relevance. (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. The multimodal recycling machine: toward a cognitive-pragmatic theory of the text/image production. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics 12:3  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Barnden, John
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Barnden, John A.
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],  pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo
Katamadze, Mariya Olegovna
2021. Irony and Humour as Tool of Realising Persuasive Strategies in Parliamentary Debates (by the Material of Debates in the German Bundestag). Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki :3  pp. 796 ff. Crossref logo
Livnat, Zohar
2020.  In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316],  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.