Chapter published in:
Irony in Language Use and Communication
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Herbert L. Colston
[Figurative Thought and Language 1] 2017
► pp. 255276
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. D. & Katz, A. N.
(2012) Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes, 49, 459–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curcó, C.
(2000) Irony: negation, echo and metarepresentation. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. and H. L. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 260–293). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Filik, R.
(2008) Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 106, 1038–1046. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J.
(2014) Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 811–828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R. & Moxey, L. M.
(2010) The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116, 421–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(1986) On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(1995) On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T.
(1998) Irony: graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13, 83–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., & Fein, O.
(1999) Irony: context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 241–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R., & Shaham, R.
(2007) Expecting irony: context versus salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 119–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In: J. Morgan and P. Cole (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J.
(2014) Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51, 287–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kowatch, K., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M.
(2013) Irony comprehension in action: A new test of processing for verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 50, 301–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S.
(1989) How to be sarcastic: the echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 374–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peleg, O., Giora, R., & Fein, O.
(2001) Salience and context effects: two are better than one. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M.
(2008) It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 286–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://​www​.R​-project​.org/.
Sperber, D., Wilson, D.
(1981) Irony and the use-mention distinction. In: Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York. (Reprinted in Davis, S. (Ed.) 1991 Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 550–563.).Google Scholar
Spotorno, N. & Noveck, I. A.
(2014) When is irony effortful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1649–1665. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Țurcan, A. & Filik, R.
(2016) An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Written Sarcasm Comprehension: The Roles of Familiarity and Context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1867–1893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Barzy, Mahsa, Ruth Filik, David Williams & Heather J. Ferguson
2020. Emotional Processing of Ironic Versus Literal Criticism in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: Evidence From Eye‐Tracking. Autism Research 13:4  pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo
Colston, Herbert L.
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Filik, Ruth, Hannah Howman, Christina Ralph-Nearman & Rachel Giora
2018. The role of defaultness and personality factors in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor and Symbol 33:3  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Howman, Hannah Elizabeth & Ruth Filik
2020. The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:11  pp. 1729 ff. Crossref logo
Pickering, Bethany, Dominic Thompson & Ruth Filik
2018. Examining the emotional impact of sarcasm using a virtual environment. Metaphor and Symbol 33:3  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.