Chapter published in:
Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectivesEdited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett
[Figurative Thought and Language 10] 2020
► pp. 85–104
Metaphor production and metaphor interpretation
Andreas Musolff | University of East Anglia
Metaphor production and interpretation are
intricately connected: the former has the latter as its ostensive
target; however, interpretation processes can trigger new metaphor
formulations which were unforeseen by the original speaker and would
have to count as new productions. This paper looks at corpus- and
survey-based evidence of innovative interpretative metaphor use that
changes the default meanings of established figurative
constructions. Specifically, we look at interpretation-induced
changes in the meaning of corporeal metaphors, on the basis of a (1)
corpus of British political discourse and (2) a questionnaire survey
of more than 1000 respondents from 31 linguistic backgrounds in 10
countries.The corpus-based evidence presented in the first part consists of
metaphor-production data that show how situational variation in
metaphor use can over time create a semantic-pragmatic drift that
changes the dominant meaning of a conventional metaphor expression,
thus illustrating diachronic variation. The questionnaire survey,
which forms the material for the second part reveals four distinct
models for body-focused readings (i.e. nation as
geobody, as hierarchical functional whole, as part of speaker’s
body, as part of larger body), plus further
person-focused readings. These data show synchronic
variation.By highlighting significant variation, both data sets put in question
the standard theory model of ‘automatic’ metaphor processing and
extension. Instead, they indicate a strong production element in
metaphor interpretation – and of interpretive aspects in metaphor
production.
Keywords: creativity, corpus, discourse history, interpretation, metaphor production, metaphor reception, nation as body/ person, questionnaire survey, variation
Published online: 17 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.10.04mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.10.04mus
References
References
Barnden, J. A.
Callahan, W. A.
Clayton, C. H.
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G.
Culpeper, J.
de
Baecque, A.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
Gibbs, R. W.
Giora, R.
Guldin, R.
Hansard
(1991) House
of commons debate on the European Council in Maastricht 11
December 1991 (Hansard vol. 200,
cc. 859–78). http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1991/dec/11/european-council-maastricht (accessed 22 September
2017).
Idström, A., & Piirainen, E.
Kantorowicz, E. H.
(2003) Metaphor
and war, again. http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15414 (accessed 21/09/2017)
(2013) Obama
reframes Syria: Metaphor and war
revisited. The Huffington
Post, 6 September
2013. http://georgelakoff.com/2013/09/06/obama-reframes-syria-metaphor-and-war-revisited/ (accessed 21/09/2017)
Littlemore, J.
Littlemore, J., Chen, P., Koester, A., & Barnden, J.
Müller, C.
Musolff, A.
Musolff, A., MacArthur, F., & Pagani, G.
Niemeier, S.
Piquer-Píriz, A.
Philip, G.
Shorter Oxford
English
Dictionary
Sperber, D.
Steen, G.
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. W.
Trim, R.
Weinreich, H.
Xinhua
(2007) Ode
to the motherland. http://english.cpc.people.com.cn/66485/66548/66551/6202008.html (accessed 20 December
2017)