Cover not available
Part of
Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 41–74

Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes

| Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University | Centre for Language Evolution, Nicolaus Copernicus University
| Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University
| Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University
Metaphor research has increasingly diversified, leading to extensive disagreements. A set of desiderata for any contemporary theory of metaphor are (i) to account for both communication and cognition, (ii) to explain both universal and culture-specific aspects, (iii) to achieve a balance between stable structures and contextual processes, (iv) to apply not only to different languages, but to other semiotic systems such as gesture, (v) to provide clear theoretical and operational definitions. We argue that a recent cognitive-semiotic theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) is capable of fulfilling these desiderata. To evaluate predictions from the theoretical model we compare motion-emotion metaphoremes, such as my heart jumped, in six differentially related European languages – English, Swedish, Spanish, Bulgarian, Finnish and Estonian.
Keywords: metaphoricity, semiotic systems, motion, emotion, cognitive semiotics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Five desiderata for a contemporary theory of metaphor
    • 2.1Combining communication and cognition
    • 2.2Combining the universal and the culture-specific
    • 2.3Combining stable and dynamic aspects
    • 2.4Metaphors across semiotic systems
    • 2.5Explicit theoretical and operational definitions
    • 2.6Summary
  • 3.Metaphor within the Motivation & Sedimentation Model
  • 4.Comparing motion-emotion metaphoremes across languages
    • 4.1General considerations
    • 4.2Methodology
    • 4.3Results
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.02zla
References (82)
References
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1987). The Poetics of Aristotle. Translation and Commentary S. Halliwell. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2012). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J. (2014). Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Lund University: Lund.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. (2020). Metalinguistic relativity: Does one’s ontology determine one’s view on linguistic relativity? Language & Communication, 76, 35–46.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., van den Heerik, R., & van den Berg, E. (2018). VisMet 1.0: An online corpus of visual metaphors. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1985). Linguistic competence: what is it really? The Modern Language Review, xxv–xxxv. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). The principles of linguistics as a cultural science. Transylvanian Review (Cluj), IX, 1, 108–115.Google Scholar
Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. Amserdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devylder, S. (2018). Diagrammatic iconicity explains assymetries in possessive conctructions: Evidence from Paamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(2), 313–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Review of Barbara Dancygier, ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (2017). English Text Construction, 12(1), 144–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J. (2020). Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the Motivation & Sedimentation Model. In A. Baicchi, & G. Radden (Eds.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 253–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3), 546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Foolen, A. (2012). The relevance of emotion for language and linguistics. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 349–369). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U. M., Racine, T. P., & Zlatev, J. (2012). Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2017). Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Styles of Communication, 9(2), 26–41.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2014). Deliteralization and the birth of emotion. In M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (pp. 50–67). London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In J. E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language (pp. 15–28). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger. Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor, & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Green, J. (2014). Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in Central Australian sand stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008a). The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 279–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(6), 15–33.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, G. (2015). Motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. BA thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, G., & Zlatev, J. (2016). Comparando metáforas de movimento-emoção em Inglês, Sueco e Espanhol. In S. M. S. Cavalcante & J. A. Militão (Eds.), Emoções: desafios para estudos da linguagem e cognição (pp. 73–101). Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Metaphor and cognition. In S. Gallagher, & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive sciences (pp. 401–414). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, N. (2017). No is not enough: Defeating the new shock politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kolter, A., Ladewig, S. H., Summa, M., Müller, C., Koch, S. C., & Fuchs, T. (2012). Body memory and the emergence of metaphor in movement and speech. In S. C. Koch, T. Fuchs, M. Summa, & C. Müller (Eds.), Body memory, metaphor and movement (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T. (2006). Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. In N. -L. Johannesson, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). The neural theory of metaphor. Available at SSRN [URL] or DOI logo
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2017). Entrenchment in cognitive grammar. In H. -J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, (pp. 39–56). Berlin: De Gruyter.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, F. (2015). On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 124–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Taylor and Francis. e-Library, 2005. ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
(1964). The primacy of perception. Evanstone, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2016). Why mixed metaphors make sense. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Kappelhoff, H. (2018). Cinematic metaphor: Experience–affectivity–temporality. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S., & Blomberg, J. (2018). Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(2), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paju, L. (2016). Motion-emotion metaphors in Estonian: A cross-linguistic comparison with Finnish, English and Swedish. MA thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz (2007). MIP: A method for finding metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saeed, J. I. (2009). Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sobrino, P. P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M. (2019). Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J. (2019). A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torstensson, B. (2019). Metaphors and their making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations. MA Thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S. -A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). How specifically are action verbs represented in the neural motor system: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 53(4), 1318–1325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, J. (2007). Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 445–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2005). What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–343). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning. Public Journal of Semiotics, 4, 2–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cognitive semiotics. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1043–1067). Springer: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 559–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Mimesis theory, learning and polysemiotic communication In M. Peters (Ed.), Encylcopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C. (2010). Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans (Ed.) Space in language and cognition: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 389–418). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U. (2012). Metaphors and subjective experience: motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consiousness, and language (pp. 423–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2019). Norms of language: What kinds and where from? Insights from phenomenology. In A. Mäkilähde, V. Leppänen & E. Itkonen (Eds.) Normativity in language and linguistics (pp. 69–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Zywiczynski, P., & Wacewicz, S. (2020). Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution, 5(2), 156–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Akkaraca Kose, Melike & Ruth Breeze
2024. Displays of anger in Turkish political discourse: a hard choice between cultural norms and political performance of anger. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Oakley, Todd & Jordan Zlatev
2024. Origins of money: a Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) analysis. Semiotica 2024:257 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard
2024. The Ambiguity of Metaphor: How Polysemy Affords Multivalent Metaphor Use and Explains the Paradox of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 39:4 ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard J.
2023. Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan
2023. The Intertwining of Bodily Experience and Language: The Continued Relevance of Merleau-Ponty. Histoire Épistémologie Langage :45-1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Bagasheva, Alexandra, Bozhil Hristov & Nelly Tincheva
2022. Introduction. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan & Kalina Moskaluk
2022. Translation validity in metaphor theories. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.