Chapter published in:
Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 4174
References

References

Abram, D.
(1996) The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Aristotle
(1987) The Poetics of Aristotle. Translation and Commentary S. Halliwell. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(2012) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J.
(2014) Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Lund University: Lund.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J.
(2020) Metalinguistic relativity: Does one’s ontology determine one’s view on linguistic relativity? Language & Communication, 76 , 35–46.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., van den Heerik, R., & van den Berg, E.
(2018) VisMet 1.0: An online corpus of visual metaphors. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112 (1), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
(2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 671–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A.
(2008) Why study metaphor and gesture. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, E.
(1985) Linguistic competence: what is it really? The Modern Language Review, xxv–xxxv. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) The principles of linguistics as a cultural science. Transylvanian Review (Cluj), IX , 1 , 108–115.Google Scholar
Cowley, S. J.
(2011) Distributed language. Amserdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devylder, S.
(2018) Diagrammatic iconicity explains assymetries in possessive conctructions: Evidence from Paamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 29 (2), 313–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Review of Barbara Dancygier, ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (2017). English Text Construction, 12 (1), 144–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J.
(2020) Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the Motivation & Sedimentation Model. In A. Baicchi, & G. Radden (Eds.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 253–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donald, M.
(2001) A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M.
(1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D.
(2000) In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76 (3), 546–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2008) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Foolen, A.
(2012) The relevance of emotion for language and linguistics. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 349–369). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U. M., Racine, T. P., & Zlatev, J.
(2012) Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2017) Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Styles of Communication, 9 (2), 26–41.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C.
(2014) Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Frontiers in psychology, 5 , 508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S.
(2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3–4), 455–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B.
(2008) Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2014) Deliteralization and the birth of emotion. In M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (pp. 50–67). London: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In J. E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language (pp. 15–28). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S.
(1995) Looking back at anger. Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor, & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2017) Metaphor wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. E.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Green, J.
(2014) Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in Central Australian sand stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P.
(2015) The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141 (4), 901. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E.
(2005) Analogy as structure and process: Approaches in linguistics, cognitive psychology and philosophy of science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008a) The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 279–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15 (6), 15–33.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, G.
(2015) Motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. BA thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, G., & Zlatev, J.
(2016) Comparando metáforas de movimento-emoção em Inglês, Sueco e Espanhol. In S. M. S. Cavalcante & J. A. Militão (Eds.), Emoções: desafios para estudos da linguagem e cognição (pp. 73–101). Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor and cognition. In S. Gallagher, & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive sciences (pp. 401–414). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N.
(2017) No is not enough: Defeating the new shock politics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kolter, A., Ladewig, S. H., Summa, M., Müller, C., Koch, S. C., & Fuchs, T.
(2012) Body memory and the emergence of metaphor in movement and speech. In S. C. Koch, T. Fuchs, M. Summa, & C. Müller (Eds.), Body memory, metaphor and movement (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T.
(2006) Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor identification. In N. -L. Johannesson, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kress, G.
(2009) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (1), 39–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The neural theory of metaphor. Available at SSRN https://​ssrn​.com​/abstract​=1437794 or Crossref
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2017) Entrenchment in cognitive grammar. In H. -J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, (pp. 39–56). Berlin: De Gruyter.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, F.
(2015) On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (1), 124–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1962) Phenomenology of perception (Taylor and Francis. e-Library 2005 ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
(1964) The primacy of perception. Evanstone, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C.
(2016) Why mixed metaphors make sense. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Kappelhoff, H.
(2018) Cinematic metaphor: Experience–affectivity–temporality. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S., & Blomberg, J.
(2018) Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics, 11 (2), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paju, L.
(2016) Motion-emotion metaphors in Estonian: A cross-linguistic comparison with Finnish, English and Swedish. MA thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz
(2007) MIP: A method for finding metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 , 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saeed, J. I.
(2009) Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sobrino, P. P.
(2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M.
(2019) Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J.
(2019) A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12 (1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14 (1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torstensson, B.
(2019) Metaphors and their making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations. MA Thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S. -A., & Bekkering, H.
(2010) How specifically are action verbs represented in the neural motor system: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 53 (4), 1318–1325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, J.
(2007) Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18 , 445–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J.
(2005) What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–343). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning. Public Journal of Semiotics, 4 , 2–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Cognitive semiotics. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1043–1067). Springer: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 559–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics, 11 (1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Mimesis theory, learning and polysemiotic communication In M. Peters (Ed.), Encylcopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C.
(2010) Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans (Ed.) Space in language and cognition: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 389–418). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U.
(2012) Metaphors and subjective experience: motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consiousness, and language (pp. 423–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J.
(2019) Norms of language: What kinds and where from? Insights from phenomenology. In A. Mäkilähde, V. Leppänen & E. Itkonen (Eds.) Normativity in language and linguistics (pp. 69–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Zywiczynski, P., & Wacewicz, S.
(2020) Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution, 5 (2), 156–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar