Cover not available
Part of
Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 307–338

Psycholinguistic approaches to figuration

| University of Birmingham
Figurative language provides a testing bed for language processing in general, since it requires speakers to utilize a sophisticated range of linguistic, pragmatic and cognitive skills to derive an appropriate interpretation. The toolkit of psycholinguistics, where precise measurements of behavioural responses help to build a model of underlying cognitive processes, can enrich our understanding of this complex topic. Two techniques that have been fruitfully applied to the study of figurative language are cross-modal priming and eye-tracking. Drawing on a range of example studies from the literature, this chapter will demonstrate how figurative language research can benefit from the application of psycholinguistic techniques. It concludes with a consideration of how experimental results can be interpreted against existing theories and models.
Keywords: psycholinguistics, experimental methods, reaction times, cross-modal priming, eye-tracking, visual world paradigm, figurative language, idioms, metaphors, metonymy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Meaning activation and cross-modal priming
    • 2.1Investigating figurative processing using cross-modal priming
    • 2.2Interacting variables in idiom processing
    • 2.3Cross-modal priming and metaphor processing
    • 2.4Other approaches to priming in the study of figurative language
  • 3.Resolving meaning in context: The use of eye-tracking
    • 3.1Eye-tracking and the ‘idiom superiority effect’
    • 3.2Figurative vs. literal meaning in idiom processing
    • 3.3Eye-tracking and the processing of metaphor and metonymy
    • 3.4Individual differences in the processing of figurative language
    • 3.5The importance of familiarity and conventionalization in figurative processing
    • 3.6Eye-tracking in other contexts
  • 4.Conclusions
    • 4.1Implications for theories of figurative processing
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.10car
References (90)
References
Al-Azary, H., & Buchanan, L. (2017). Novel metaphor comprehension: semantic neighbourhood density interacts with concreteness. Memory & Cognition, 45, 296–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altarriba, J., Kroll, J., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 477–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., Roncero, C., de Almeida, R. G., & Agauas, S. J. (2018). The early processing of metaphors and similes: evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 161–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: the journey from features to meaning (A travel update). In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd edition, pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blasko, D., & Briihl, D. (1997). Reading and recall of metaphorical sentences: effects of familiarity and context. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 261–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blasko, D., & Connine, C. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(2), 295–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 668–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C., Corradini, P., & Ferlazzo, F. (2018). Cognitive and personality components underlying spoken idiom comprehension in context. An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C., Padovani, R., & Corradini, P. (2007). Exploring the relationship between individuals’ speed of processing and their comprehension of spoken idioms. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 417–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., & Butcher, K. (2007). Processing of idiomatic expressions: evidence for a new hybrid view. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 79–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., & Declerq, C. (2011). Kill the song – steal the show: what does distinguish predicative metaphors from decomposable idioms? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40(3), 205–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2017). Cross language priming extends to formulaic units: evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea “has legs”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 299–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63(1), 95–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2020). Resolving figurative expressions during reading: the role of familiarity, transparency, and context. Discourse Processes, 57(7), 609–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., Conklin, K., & Gyllstad, H. (2016). Found in translation: the influence of l1 on the processing of idioms in L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 403–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., Littlemore, J., & Dowens, M. G. (2018). Of false friends and familiar foes: comparing native and non-native understanding of figurative phrases. Lingua, 204, 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research, 22(2), 115–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B., & Heredia, R. R. (2017). How to save your skin when processing L2 idioms: an eye movement analysis of idiom transparency and cross-language similarity among bilinguals. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 81–107.Google Scholar
Cieślicka, A. B., Heredia, R. R., & Olivares, M. (2014). It’s all in the eyes: how language dominance, salience, and context affect eye movements during idiomatic language processing. In M. Pawlak, & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism (pp. 21–41). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Citron, F., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(1), 2585–2595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Columbus, G., Sheikh, N. A., Cote-Lecaldare, M., Hauser, K., Baum, S. R., & Titone, D. (2015). Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1057. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018). Eye-tracking: A guide for Applied Linguistics research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: a new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., Davenport, T., Knoeferle, P., & Creel, S. (2015). Time course of metaphor comprehension in the visual world. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2015) (pp. 465–470). Austin, TX, USA.Google Scholar
Fanari, R., Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (2010). The role of idiom length and context in spoken idiom comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(30), 321–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116(3), 421–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Brightman, E., Gathercole, C., & Leuthold, H. (2017). The emotional impact of verbal irony: eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 193–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Wallington, K., & Page, J. (2014). Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 40(3), 811–828. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Findlay, H., & Carrol, G. (2019). Contributions of semantic richness to the processing of idioms. The Mental Lexicon, 13(3), 311–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: support for underspecification. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4), 149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraert, K., Baayen, R. H., & Newman, J. (2017). Understanding idiomatic variation. Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2017), Valencia, Spain, April 4th, 2017. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genovesi, C., & Vertolli, M. (2016). An eye for figurative meaning. Proceedings of the 38th Cognitive Science Society Conference (CogSci 2016), Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 10th-13th 2016.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M., & Robertson, R. (1999). The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1619–1630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8, 149–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986). Skating on thin ice: literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes, 9(1), 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: salience, context and figurative language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: volume 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, J., & Gibbs, R. (1999). Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heredia, R. R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (2016). Metaphoric reference: an eye movement analysis of Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilingual readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing idioms: syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56(3), 373–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huette, S., & Matlock, T. (2016). Figurative language processing: fictive motion and the visual world. In P. Knoeferle, P. Pyykkönen-Klauck, & M. W. Crocker (Eds.), Visually situated language comprehension (pp. 185–203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 612–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A., Lima, S., & Carroll, P. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory and Cognition, 12(6), 558–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kessler, R., Weber, A., & Friedrich, C. (2020). Activation of literal word meanings in idioms: evidence from eye-tracking and ERP experiments. Language and Speech, published online July 27th 2020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 22(2), 154–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyriacou, M., Conklin, K., & Thompson, D. (2020). Passivizability of idioms: has the wrong tree been barked up? Language and Speech, 63(2), 404–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, M., & Titone, D. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. J. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd edition, pp. 581–611). London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milburn, E., & Warren, T. (2019). Idioms show effects of meaning relatedness and dominance similar to those seen for ambiguous words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 591–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N. (2010). Online fictive motion understanding: an eye-movement study with Hindi. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), 144–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 433–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paterson, K., Liversedge, S., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 717–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Frisson, S. (2001). Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27(2), 556–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. C., & Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: an eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102, 129–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 83–111). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: an eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. (2011). Seeing a phrase ‘time and again’ matters: the role of phrasal Frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Rabanus, S., & Rösler, F. (2007). Processing verbs in German idioms: evidence against the configuration hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(3), 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S. (2015). Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(03), 419–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, S., Levelt, W., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 327–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 523–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D. A., Onifer, W., Prather, P., & Hirshkowitz, M. (1979). Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences. Memory & Cognition, 7(3), 159–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabossi, P., & Zardon, F. (1993). The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: processing, structure and interpretation (pp. 145–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1995). The activation of idiomatic meaning. In M. Everaert, E. van den Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 273–282), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2005). Spoken idiom recognition: meaning retrieval and word expectancy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 465–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory and Cognition, 37(4), 529–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistics information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titone, D., & Connine, C. (1994). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20(5), 1126–1138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655–1674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titone, D., Lovseth, K., Kasparian, K., & Tiv, M. (2019). Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 73(4), 216–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Țurcan, A., & Filik, R. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1867–1893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Ginkel, W., & Dijkstra, T. (2020). The tug of war between an idiom’s figurative and literal meanings: evidence from native and bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainio, S., & Nenonen, M. (2007). Reading idioms in Finnish: an eye-tracking study. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: papers from the first Nordic conference on syntactic freezes (pp. 363–377). Studies in Languages 41, University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Vilkaite, L. (2016). Are nonadjacent collocations processed faster? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 42(10), 1632–1642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, M. J., & Seow, C. S. (2014). The influence of emotion on lexical processing: insights from RT distributional analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 526–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Senaldi, Marco S. G. & Debra Titone
2024. Idiom meaning selection following a prior context: eye movement evidence of L1 direct retrieval and L2 compositional assembly. Discourse Processes 61:1-2 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Carrol, Gareth & Katrien Segaert
2023. As easy as cake or a piece of pie? Processing idiom variation and the contribution of individual cognitive differences. Memory & Cognition DOI logo
Alkhammash, Reem
2022. Processing figurative language: Evidence from native and non-native speakers of English. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Senaldi, Marco S. G., Junyan Wei, Jason W. Gullifer & Debra Titone
2022. Scratching your tête over language-switched idioms: Evidence from eye-movement measures of reading. Memory & Cognition 50:6 ► pp. 1230 ff. DOI logo
Kyriacou, Marianna, Kathy Conklin & Dominic Thompson
2021. When the Idiom Advantage Comes Up Short: Eye-Tracking Canonical and Modified Idioms. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.