Cover not available
Part of
Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 1–16

Introduction
Figurative language

Intersubjectivity and usage

| Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Article outline
  • 1.Figurative language, intersubjectivity and usage
  • 2.Social and empirical turn in figurativity research
  • 3.Overview of the sections and contributions
    • 3.1Part one. Intersubjectivity and interaction
    • 3.2Part two. Mechanisms and processes
    • 3.3Part three. Usage and variation
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.int
References (53)
References
Allan, K. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy. A diachronic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, E. (2008a). El lenguaje como cultura. Una crítica del discurso sobre el lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
(2008b). Collective cognition and individual activity: Variation, language and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 137–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Brône, G., & Oben, B. (Eds.) (2018). Eye-tracking in interaction. Studies on the role of eye gaze in dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2007). Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2019). Eye-tracking and the role of context in figurative understanding. Paper presented as part of the Theme session on Eye-tracking for figurative language research: methods, best practices & challenges at the 7th Specialised RaAM seminar, University of Liège, Belgium, 16–17th May 2019.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (177–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Vera, J. E. (Ed.) (2015). Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures. Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse? In Soares da Silva, A., Martins, C., Magalhães, L., & Gonçalves, M. (Eds.), Comunicação, cognição e media (pp. 41–60). Braga: Axioma, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2016). The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 527–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor, & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (Eds.) (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Pres. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. (2018). Usage-based cognitive models: Behavioural profiles and quantifying context effects on conceptual metaphors. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Figurative Thought and Language, Braga, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 23–26 October.
Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.) (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gola, E., & Ervas, F. (Eds.) (2016). Metaphor and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). A usage-based model. In R. W. Langacker. Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar (pp. 261–288). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (Eds.) (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rakova, M. (2002). The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay? Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 215–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). The extent of the literal. Metaphor, polysemy, and theories of concepts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2017). Advances in cultural linguistics. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015). Grammar and cooperative communication. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 232–252). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winters, M. E., Tissari, H., & Allan, K. (Eds.) (2010). Historical Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.) (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar