Cover not available
Part of
Modeling Irony: A cognitive-pragmatic account
Inés Lozano-Palacio and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Figurative Thought and Language 12] 2022
► pp. 155–169

References

Abel, L. (2003). Tragedy and metatheatre: Essays on dramatic form. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
Al-Hindawi, F. H. H., & Kadhim, B. J. (2017). A pragmatic study of irony in political electoral speeches. In F. H. H. Al-Hindawi, & W. R. Al-Juwaid (Eds.), Pragmatic analysis of political data (pp. 260–309). Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, L. (1995). Verbal irony and the Maxims of Grice’s cooperative principle. Revista alicantina de estudios ingleses, 8, 25–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Functions and strategies of ironic discourse: an analysis. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense.Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, L., & Attardo, S. (2014). The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In G. Thomson, & L. Alba Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in context. (pp. 93–116). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. C. (2004). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2000). Irony as a Game of Implicitness: Acoustic Profiles of Ironic Communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(3), 275–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristophanes. (1982). Lysistrata. Oxford: Oxford University Press (unknown first publication date).Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, A. (2017a). Cultural conceptualisations of IRONY in Greek. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 111–124). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Irony has a metonymic basis. In A. Athanasiadou, & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 201–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000a). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask – International Journal of Language and Communication, 12(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
(2000b). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Humour and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, L. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Studies in new technologies and practice in communication. Say not to say: new perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. HUMOUR, 16, 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor, 16(2), 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atwood, M. (2005). The Penelopiad. Edinburgh: Cannongate.Google Scholar
Austen, J. (2012). Pride and Prejudice. London: Penguin Classics (first published in 1813).Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1955). How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University. Oxford: Clarendon Press (first published in 1962).Google Scholar
Baicchi, A. (2015). Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(1), 106–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1993). Rabelais and his world. (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press (first published in 1941).Google Scholar
Baldick, C. (1996). The concise Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banksy. Madonna con Pistola. Graffiti. (unknown). Public street. Naples.
Barbe, K. (1993). Irony in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. (2017). Irony, pretence and fictively-elaborating hyperbole. In H. Colston, & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), Irony in Language Use and Communication (pp.145–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. (1959). Littérature et méta-langage. Essais critiques, 106–108. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Becker, I., & Giora, R. (2018). The Defaultness Hypothesis: A quantitative corpus-based study of non/default sarcasm and literalness production. Journal of Pragmatics, 138, 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benwell, B. (2004). Ironic discourse: Evasive masculinity in men’s lifestyle magazines. Men and masculinities, 7(1), 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertucelli, M. (2018). Irony as a complex attitude. Lingue e Linguaggi, 26, 59–80.Google Scholar
Bisztray, G. (1988). Romantic irony in Scandinavian literature. In F. Garber (Ed.), Romantic Irony (pp. 178–187). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2005). From theory to practice: Frame Semantics and the design of FrameNet. In S. Langer, & D. Schnorbusch (Eds.). Semantik im lexicon (pp. 129–160). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1974). A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Botha, C. F. (2008). From destruktion to deconstruction: A response to Moran. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(1), 52–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2007). When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Or, Some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 125–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M. (2011) What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Bryant, G. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, S. C. (2009). Criteria of adequacy in functional linguistics. Folia Linguistica, 43(1), 1–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, S. C., & F. Gonzálvez-García. (2014). Exploring functional-cognitive space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byron. (1996). Don Juan. London: Penguin (first published in 1819).Google Scholar
Calvino, I. (1998). If on a winter’s night a traveler. New York: Vintage (first published in 1979).Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, pretence and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs, 46, 587–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2015). Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cervantes, M. de. (2005). Don Quijote de la Mancha. Madrid: Cátedra Letras Hispánicas (first published in 1605).Google Scholar
Chaucer, G. (2005). The Canterbury Tales. London: Penguin Classics (first published in 1476).Google Scholar
Chevalier, H. (1932). The ironic temper. Anatole France and his time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chiaro, D. (1992). The language of jokes: Analysing verbal play. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chopin, K. (2000). Story of an Hour. New York: Harper Perennial Classics (first published in 1894).Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & R. J. Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2004). Irony: The New Critical Idiom. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H., & Gibbs, R. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 57–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You’ll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. E. (2000). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(11), 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson, & B. Lewandowska-Tomasczyk (Eds.), The Literal and the Nonliteral in Language and Thought (pp. 129–144). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curcó, C. (2000). Irony: Negation, echo and metarepresentation. Lingua, 110(4), 257–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, G. (2006). Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (Ed.), The Architecture of Imagination (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dane, J. A. (1991). The critical mythology of irony. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
De Man, P. (1996). The concept of irony. Aesthetic Ideology, 65, 163–184.Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C. (1997). The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dill, H. J. (1989). Romantic irony in the works of Robert Schumann. Musical Quarterly, 73, 172–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimic, M. V. (1988). Romantic irony and the southern Slavs. In F. Garber (Ed.), Romantic Irony (pp. 250–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R. (1993). Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conceptualisation. Leuvense Bijdragen, 8(2), 1–25.Google Scholar
Dubs, H. H. (1927). The Socratic Problem. The Philosophical Review, 36(4), 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupriez, B. (1991). A dictionary of literary devices, gradus A-Z, (A. W. Halsall, Trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, M. (2013). Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 403–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. International Journal of Humour Research, 27(4), 619–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Postmodernism, irony and the enjoyable. In B. Nicol (Ed.), Postmodernism and the contemporary novel, (pp. 110–112). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Elleström, L. (2002). Divine madness: On interpreting literature, music and the visual arts. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2008). Socratic irony as pretence. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 1–33.Google Scholar
Fielding, H. (1991). Tom Jones. London: Everyman (first published in 1749).Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing (pp. 55–81). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
(1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
(1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–255.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. (2003). Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finlay, M. (1988). The Romantic irony of semiotics: Friedrich Schlegel and the crisis of representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firchow, P. (1971). Introduction. Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the Fragments. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–39.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. H. (2003). Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a cognitive theory of literature. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metonymy and Metaphor at the Crossroads, (pp. 253–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2005). Demosthenes. Speeches 18 and 19. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Garmendia, J. (2018). Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J., & Steen, G. (Eds.). (2003). Cognitive Poetics in practice. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerson, D. (Writer) & Docter, P. (Director.) (2002). Monsters Inc. [Film]. Pixar Studios.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, J., Jackendorf, R., Rosen, N., & Russell, K. (2004). Contrastive Focus Reduplication in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(2), 307–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Processes and products in making sense of tropes. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 252–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Speaking and thinking with metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 61–76). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Embodiment in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Are ironic acts deliberate? Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 104–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Embodied metaphor. In J. Littlemore, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 167–184). London: Blooomsbury.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 133–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(6), 523–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Sammermit, P. (2017). How does irony arise in experience? In H. Colston, & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 43–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (Ed.) (2011). Cicero: Against Verres. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Gillespie, G. (1988). Romantic irony in modern anti-theater. In F. Garber (Ed.), Romantic Irony (pp.343–357). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Irony and its discontent. In D. Shram, & G. Steen (Eds). Utretch publications in general and comparative literature. The psychology and sociology of literature: in Honour of Elrud Isch, vol. 35 (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: Context and Salience, Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 241–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Alkeslassy Levi, N., & Sabah, H. (2005). On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes, 39, 81–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kaufman, R., Eisenberg, D., & Erez, S. (2009). Does an “ironic situation” favor an ironic interpretation? In G. Brone, & J. Vandaele (Eds.) Cognitive Poetics. Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 383–399). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Bio-Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21(3), 360–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), 327–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, F., & C. S. Butler. (2018). Situating Valency Theory in functional-cognitive space. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2),348–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66, 377–88; reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words (1989). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, J., & Grimm, W. (1972). The complete Grimm’s fairy tales. New York: Pantheon House.Google Scholar
Groupe Mu. (1970). Rhétorique générale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp. 140–165). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiesen, M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Hamamoto, H. (1998). Irony from a cognitive perspective. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory (pp. 257–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, E., & Huntington, C. (Eds.). (2005). Plato: the collected dialogues including the letters. Princeton: Princeton University Press (first published in 1963).Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. (1990). The Book of Genesis. Chapters 1–17. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hardy, T. (1978). Tess of the D’Urbervilles. London: Penguin Classics (first published in 1891).Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. (1990). A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrero, F. J. (2009). Understanding tropes. At the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Pieterlen: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (2001). Toward a politics of mockery in Greece. In J. W. Fernandez, & M. T. Huber. (Eds.), Irony in action: Anthropology, practice, and the moral imagination (pp. 63–83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, R., & Iglesias Recuero, S. (2009). Humor e ironía: una relación compleja. In L. Ruiz-Gurillo, & X. Padilla-García (Eds.), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: una aproximación pragmática a la ironía (pp. 423–455). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Highet, G. (1962). Anatomy of satire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holdcroft, D. (1983). Irony as a trope, and irony as discourse. Poetics today, 4(3), 493–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, H. V. (Ed.) (1989). The concept of irony with continual reference to Socrates, by Soren Kierkegaard. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 11–42). Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Neo-Gricean pragmatics: A Manichean manifesto. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 158–183). Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988). Pragmatic theory. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. (Volume 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hussein, P. A. (2015). Linguistics and literary criticism: Shall the Twain never meet? International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 15(2), 473–481.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. (1988). A Poetics of postmodernism. Abingdon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
(1994). Irony’s edge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iza, A. (2015). Complementary alternation discourse constructions in English: A preliminary study. International Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 71–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iza, E. A. (2021). Discourse constructions in English: Meaning, form, and hierarchies. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1963). Essais de linguistique genérale. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. (2010). Post-Gricean pragmatics. In L. Cummings (Ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia (pp. 362–364). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception. (T. Bahti, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jobert, M., & Sorlin, S. (Eds.). (2018). The pragmatics of irony and banter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, J., Miller, G. A., & Sperber, D. (1984). Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 112–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juvenal. (2004). Complete works of Juvenal. (G. G. Ramsay, Trans.). Hastings: Delphi Classics (first published in 1928).Google Scholar
Kapogianni, E. (2009, April 23–25). Strategies for the derivation of ironic meaning: the case of non-cancellable irony. [conference paper]. Paper delivered at I-Mean (Meaning and Interaction) Conference, Bristol (UK). (United Kingdom), 23–25 April, 2009.
Katz, A. (2017). The standard experimental approach to the study of irony. Let us not be hasty in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. In H. Colston, & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 237–254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufer, D. (1977). Irony and rhetorical strategy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 19(2), 90–110.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The ‘What’s X doing Y’ construction. Language, 75, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1980). L’énonciation de la subjectivité dans le langage. Malakoff: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Knox, D. (1961). The work irony and its context, 1500–1755. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
(1989). Ironia: Medieval and Renaissance ideas on irony. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering the role of context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 21–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of the pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz (Eds.) (1991). Master metaphor list. Cognitive Linguistics Group. University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lane, M. (2006). The evolution of eironeia in classical Greek texts: Why Socratic eironeia is not Socratic irony. In D. Sedley (Ed.) Oxford studies in ancient philosophy XXXI (pp. 49–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Reconsidering Socratic Irony. In D. R. Morrison (Ed.). The Cambridge companion to Socrates (pp. 237–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (2011). A case for irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, H. (1982). To kill a mockingbird. New York: Grand Central Publishing (first published in 1960).Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1983). Principles of pragmatics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
(2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leggitt, J. S., & Gibbs, R. (2000). Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leite, N. (1994). Master metonymy list. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Levinson, R. (Writer), & Frawley, J. (Director). (1989). Sex and the married detective (S8 E3) [TV series episode]. In P. Saltzman (Executive Producer), Columbo. NBC.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). Minimization and conversational inference. In J. Verschueren, & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 61–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Three levels of meaning. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Grammar and meaning. Essays in honour of Sir John Lyons (pp. 90–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippitt, J. (2000). Humour and irony in Kierkegaard’s thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D. (1965). The British Museum is falling down. London: McGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
Longyear, R. M. (1970). Beethoven and Romantic irony. Musical Quarterly, 56, 647–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, I. (2019). Irony in linguistics and literary theory: towards a synthetic approach. Miscelánea, 59, 95–115.Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 129–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Mind, culture, person: Elements in a cultural psychology. Human Development, 38(1), 2–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucariello, J., & Mindolovich, C. (1995). The development of complex metarepresentational reasoning: The case of situational irony. Cognitive Development, 10(4), 551–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, N. (2017). Karl Popper, science and Enlightenment. London: UCL Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellado, C. (2015). Antiphrasis-based comparative constructional idioms in Spanish. Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 111–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1993). Images, similes and metaphors. In A. Artony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 357–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. R. (Ed.) (2011). The Cambridge companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. (1999). The Bluest Eye. New York: Vintage (first published in 1970).Google Scholar
Muecke, D. C. (1969). The compass of irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
(1970). Irony and the ironic: The critical idiom. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 95–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A., MacArthur, F., & Pagani, G. (2014). Metaphor and intercultural communication. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Myers, A. (1977). Toward a definition of irony. In R. W. Fasold, & R. W. Shuy (Eds.). Studies in language variation: semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics, social situations, ethnographic approaches (pp. 171–185). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization: A cognitive perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orwell, G. (2008). Animal farm: A fairy story. London: Penguin Books (first published in 1945).Google Scholar
Palinkas, I. (2014). Metaphor, irony, and blending. Argumentum, 10, 611–630.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. (2005). The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 353–386). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2014). Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 168–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). The role of inferencing in two expressive speech act constructions. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, P. Pérez-Sobrino, & A. Luzondo-Oyón (Eds.), Constructing families of constructions (pp. 109–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy? In A. Barcelona, O. Blanco-Carrión, & R. Pannain (Eds.), The ubiquity of conceptual metonymy: From morpheme to discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peña, S. (2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6), 1041–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Cognitive mechanisms underlying fake reflexive resultatives. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36(4), 502–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). For better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health: A cognitive-linguistic study of/approach to merism. Metaphor & Symbol (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Peña, S., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017). Construing and constructing hyperbole. In A. Athanasiadou (Ed.), Studies in figurative thought and language (pp. 41–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, L. (2016). The role of mitigation and strengthening cognitive operations in brand names design: a case study of Spanish and American wine brands. Social Semiotics, 26(2), 128–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). XL burgers, shiny pizzas, and ascending drinks: primary metaphors and conceptual interaction in fast food printed advertising. Cognitive Linguistics, 30 (3), 531–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, L. (1996). L’ironie mise en trope: Du sense des enoncés hyperboliques et ironiques. Paris: Éditions Kimé.Google Scholar
Pexman, J., Zdrazilova, L., Deater, K., & McConnachie, D. (2009). “That was smooth, mom”: Children’s production of verbal and gestural irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 237–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plautus. (1989). Comedias I. (J. Román, Trans.) Cátedra – Letras Universales (unknown first publication date).Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2014). Pretence and echo: Towards an integrated account of verbal irony. International Review of Pragmatics, 6(1), 127–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
(1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press (first published in 1928). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (1989). The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4, 295–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Récanati, F. (2007). Indexicality, context and pretense: A speech-act theory account. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Advances in pragmatics (pp.213–229). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reich, A. & Cohen, T. (Writers) & Bright, K. (Director.). (1997). The One with the Hypnosis Tape (S3 E18) [TV series episode]. In J. Burrows & S. Scott (Executive Producers), Friends. Bright/Kaufmann/Crane Productions.Google Scholar
Reyes, A., & Rosso, P. (2014). On the difficulty of automatically detecting irony: beyond a simple case of negation. Knowledge and Information Systems, 40(3), 595–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Buscaldi, D. (2012). From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. Data & Knowlwedge Engineering, 74, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Veale, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(1), 239–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2005). Frame-shifting in Humour and Irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(4), 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romano, M. (2015). Are similes and metaphors interchangeable? A case study in opinion discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roochnik, D. (1995). Socratic ignorance as complex irony. Arechs, 28, 39–52.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 259–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2013). Meaning construction, meaning interpretation, and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (pp. 231–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a). On the nature and scope of metonymy in linguistic description and explanation: towards settling some controversies. In J. Littlemore, & J. Taylor (Eds.). The Bloomsbury companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 143–166). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
(2014b). Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 187–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a). Cognitive modeling and irony. In H. Colston, & A. Athanasiadou (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication (pp. 179–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2020a). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language and Communication, 71, 16–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). Figurative language: relations and constraints. In J. Barnden, & A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives (pp. 469–510 (pp. 469–510). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Ten lectures on cognitive modeling: Between grammar and language-based inferencing. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2013). La construcción reduplicativa de base léxica en español para estudiantes de español como L2. In S. De Knop, F. Mollica, & J. Kuhn, (Eds.) Konstrcuktionsgrammatik in der romanischen Sprachen (pp. 205–225). Pieterlen: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Barreras-Gómez, M. A. (2015). Time and cognition in Marvell’s “To His Coy Mistress”. Cognitive Semantics, 1, 241–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Díez, O. (2002). Metonymic motivation in anaphoric reference. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 294–320). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). The metonymic exploitation of descriptive, attitudinal, and regulatory scenarios in making meaning. In A. Baicchi (Ed.) Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 284–307). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Gómez, M. A. (2014). Constructing discourse and discourse constructions. In M. A. Gómez, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. Gonzálvez-García, & A. Downing (Eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space (295–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Lozano, I. (2019a). Unraveling irony: From linguistics to literary criticism and back. Cognitive Semantics, 5, 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Complexity in Irony: Dissecting the Ironic Echo. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). On verbal and situational irony: towards a unified approach. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative language – Intersubjectivity and usage (pp. 213–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Peña, S. (2005). Conceptual interaction, cognitive operations and projection spaces. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 254–280). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, L., & Alvarado-Ortega, B. (Eds.). (2013). Irony and Humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. J. (1999). The trickster shift: Humour and irony in contemporary native art. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1979). Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedgewick, G. G. (1935). Of irony, especially in drama. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Seery, J. E. (2019). Political Returns: Irony in politics and theory from Plato to the Antinuclear Movement. New York: Routledge (first published in 1990). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J. (Eds.). (2002). Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seto, K. (1998). On non-echoic irony. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory (pp. 239–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1994). Othello. Abingdon: Routledge (first published in 1604).Google Scholar
(1997). Julius Caesar. Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd. (first published in 1599).Google Scholar
(2015). Romeo and Juliet. London: Penguin Classics (first published in 1595).Google Scholar
Shelley, C. (2001). The bicoherence theory of situational irony. Cognitive Science, 25(5), 775–818.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shilikhina, K. (2013). Multiple voices in ironic discourse. Language and Dialogue 3(2), 186–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, A. (2016). The persuasive (and manipulative) power of metaphor in ‘austerity’ discourse. In M. Romano, & M. D. Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in social and cognitive interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 79–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sophocles. (2006). Three Theban Plays: Antigone, Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus. London: Penguin Classics. Unknown date of first publication.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Jiang, W. (2003). Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10–11), 1633–1650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 130–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Ement, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language, 25, 359–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1985/1986). Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 86, 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1998). Irony and relevance. A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and implications (pp. 283–93). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spiegelman, A. (1996). The Complete Maus. New York: Pantheon (first published 1971–1991).Google Scholar
Sterne, L. (1996). The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. London: Wordsworth (first published in 1759).Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1988). Discourse communities, genres and English as an international language. World Englishes, 7(2), 211–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swearingen, C. J. (1991). Rhetoric and irony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swift, J. (1996). A Modest Proposal. Mineola: Dover (first published in 1729).Google Scholar
Szegedy-Maszák, M. (1988). Romantic irony in nineteenth-century Hungarian literature. In F. Garber (Ed.), Romantic Irony, (pp. 202–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. R. (1948). The anatomy of drama. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 6(3), 281–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. A. K. (2003). Irony: An historical introduction. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Thorlby, A. (1988). Imagination and Irony in English Romantic Poetry. In F. Garber (Ed.), Romantic Irony (pp.131–155). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobin, V., & Israel, M. (2012). Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In B. Dancygier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language (pp. 24–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R. (2008). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Twain, M. (2003). The adventures of Huckleberry Finn. London: Penguin Classics (first published in 1884).Google Scholar
Vasiliou, I. (2013). Socratic Irony. In N. Smith, & J. Bussanich (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates (pp. 20–34). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2012). Exploding the creativity myth: The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Veale, T., & Hao, Y. (2010, August 16–20). Detecting ironic intent in creative comparisons [conference paper]. Paper delivered at 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Lisbon (Portugal), 16–20 August, 2010.
Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voltaire. (1995). Candide, ou l’optimisme. Paris: Hachette (first published in 1759).Google Scholar
Walaszewska, E. (2013). Like in similes. A relevance-theoretic view. Research in Language, 11(3), 323–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog theory for critical argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, L. (2013). Towards Redefining Socratic Irony. Akroterion, 58, 1–17.Google Scholar
Watson, W. G. E. (1986). Classical Hebrew poetry: A guide to its techniques. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, M. (2006). Are all conversational implicatures cancellable? Analysis, 66, 127–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1990). Cross-cultural pragmatics and different values. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 43–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1981). On verbal irony. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1995). Is there a maxim of truthfulness? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7.Google Scholar
(2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111(443), 583–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116, 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 183–226.Google Scholar
(2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Explaining irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winterson, J. (2012). The daylight gate. London: Hammer.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2007). The irony of Socrates. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(2), 175–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Worcester, D. (1940). The art of satire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. (Writer & Director.). (2016). Nosedive (S3 E1) [TV series episode]. In C. Brooker (Executive producer). Black Mirror. Netflix.Google Scholar
Wyler, W. (Director.) (1954). Roman holiday. [Film]. Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
Yamanashi, M. (1998). Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory (pp. 271–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, F. (2000). On reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 27–78.Google Scholar
(2009). Saturación contextual en la comprensión de la ironía. In L. Ruiz-Gurillo, & X. Padilla-García. (Eds.), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía (pp. 309–331). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015, July 26–31). Contextual sources, mutually manifest assumptions and epistemic vigilance in ironic communication [conference paper]. Paper delivered at the 14th International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp (Belgium), 26–31 July, 2015.
(2016a). Humour and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 23(1), 92–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016c). Relevance theory and contextual sources-centred analysis of irony. Current research and compatibility. In M. Padilla-Cruz (Ed.) Relevance Theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions (pp. 147–171). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar