Chapter published in:
Figurative Thought and Language in Action
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Figurative Thought and Language 16] 2022
► pp. 1936
References
Burgers, C., Brugman, B., Renardel de Lavalette, K., & Steen, G.
(2016) HIP: A method for linguistic hyperbole identification in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 31, 163–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardillo, E., Schmidt, G., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A.
(2010) Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 651–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, A., & Chiang, W-y.
(2016) Behold, I am coming soon! A study of the conceptualization of sexual orgasm in 27 languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 31, 131–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(2015) Using figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csordas, Th. J.
(Ed.) (1994) Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2013) Functional constraints, usage, and mental grammars: A study of speakers’ intuitions about questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 633–665. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Words that go together: Measuring individual differences in native speakers’ knowledge of collocations. The Mental Lexicon, 9, 401–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D., Dąbrowska, E., & Arppe, A.
(2016) Machine meets man: Evaluating the psychological reality of corpus-based probabilistic models. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. 
(2014) The role of cultural artifacts in the interpretation of metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor and Symbol, 29, 94–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. & Feist, M.
(2014) Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 29–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(1980) Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8, 149–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes, 7, 17–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) The allegorical impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 121–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 363–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Metaphoric cognition as social activity: Dissolving the divide between metaphor in thought and communication. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 54–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Cameron, L.
(2007) Social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 64–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Santa Cruz, M.
(2012) Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphoric experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 27, 299–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Tendahl, M., & Okonski, L.
(2011) Inferring pragmatic messages from metaphor. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 7, 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kok, K., & Cienki, A.
(2017) Taking simulation semantics out of the laboratory: Towards an interactive and multimodal reappraisal of embodied language comprehension. Language & Cognition, 7, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okonski, L., & Gibbs, R.
(2019) Diving into the wreck: Can people resist allegorical meaning? Journal of Pragmatics, 141, 28–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–40.
Reijnierse, G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G.
(2018) DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 129–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffman, H.
(2011) Sensation and perception: An integrative approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Semino, E.
(2010) Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 205–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, J., & D’Espisito, M.
(2016) The segregation and integration of distinct brain networks and their relations to cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 12083–12094. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2018) Visual metaphor: Structure and process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., Pasma, T.
(2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2011) Constructional preemption by contextual mismatch: A corpus-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 107–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R.
(2008) Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P., & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar