The effect of figurative thought on basic level categorization
How categories come to be formed and named
The definition for basic level categories relies on perceptual attributes, mostly on the perception of particular shape characteristics (Rosch, 1978). However, as is well known, there are cross-linguistic differences in basic level categorization with regard to the scope of the categories designated by the respective terms. Since word meanings do not directly correspond to perceptually definable basic level categories, these words do not designate the same range of referents, even though the attributes themselves do not necessarily differ cross-culturally. The same objects may belong to totally different linguistic categories, or even be assigned to levels above or below the perceptually basic one of the category system in different languages. The present theoretical study will explore why objects exhibiting similar perceptual characteristics come to be assigned to different linguistic categories. I suggest that the diversity originates in the figurative construals and ensuing conceptualizations underlying the lexicalization processes of these categories.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The role of figuration and perception in the formation of basic level categories in language
- 3.The conceptualization of basic level categories and the influence of figuration
- 3.1Levels of categorization, the scope of categories, and the effect of figurative thought
- 3.2Figuration in the conceptualization and lexicalization of categories
- 4.Conclusion
-
References