Cover not available
Part of
Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Figurative Thought and Language 7] 2020
► pp. 43–69

Chapter 3
Music, metaphor, and creativity

| University of Chicago, Department of Music
This chapter explores the resources for meaning construction provided by music and how musical communication exemplifies creativity. Using two short passages from Haydn’s The Creation as examples, the chapter investigates how musical sounds are correlated with nonmusical phenomena through analogy, a cognitive process related to but distinct from metaphor. The relationship between analogy and metaphor is considered in some detail and connected to explanations of musical meaning construction that draw on semiotics and conceptual metaphor theory. This explanatory framework is extended to musical metonymy, illustrated by an example from Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony. The chapter proposes that nonlinguistic forms of communication like music provide important insights into analogy, metaphor, and metonymy, and thus into the study of human creativity.
Keywords: music, analogy, Haydn, nonlinguistic communication, meaning construction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1A musical bestiary
    • 1.2Sine-wave speech and words about music
    • 1.3Metaphor, analogy, and metonymy
    • 1.4Music, metaphor, and creativity
  • 2.Analogical thought and musical understanding
    • 2.1Another animal in the bestiary
    • 2.2Research on analogy
    • 2.3Analogical thought and tone painting
  • 3.From musical analogy to musical metaphor
    • 3.1Analogy and metaphor
    • 3.2Musical topics and musical meaning
    • 3.3Conceptual metaphor theory and music
      • 3.3.1The metaphor of the pastoral
      • 3.3.2Music and conceptual metaphors
      • 3.3.3Summary
  • 4.Music and Metonymy
  • 5.Creativity in and around musical utterances
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.03zbi
References (49)
References
Agawu, V. K. (1991). Playing with signs: A semiotic interpretation of classical music. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Music as discourse: Semiotic adventures in romantic music. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Reasoning and thinking in nonhuman primates. In K. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 607–632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chuck, G. (2004). Musical meaning and cognitive operations of the embodied mind. Ph. D. Dissertation. The University of Rochester, Eastman School of Music.Google Scholar
Clayton, M. (2005). Communication in Indian raga performance. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D. J. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 361–381). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubos, A. (1748). Critical reflections on poetry, painting and music: With an inquiry into the rise and progress of the theatrical entertainments of the ancients. (T. Nugent, Trans.). (5th ed., revised, corrected and enlarged) (Vol. 1). London: Printed for J. Nourse.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J. (2006, July-August). Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 609–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997, January). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983, April-June). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195–235). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godøy, R. I. (2010). Gestural affordances of musical sound. In R. I. Godøy, & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 103–125). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Essays in developmental psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2001). Analogical reasoning in children. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 437–470). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hatten, R. S. (1994). Musical meaning in Beethoven: Markedness, correlation, and interpretation. Advances in semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Interpreting musical gestures, topics, and tropes: Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert. Musical meaning and interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haydn, J. (1959). The collected correspondence and London notebooks of Joseph Haydn (H. R. Landon, Ed.). London: Barrie and Rockliff.Google Scholar
Herman, L. M. (2002). Exploring the cognitive world of the bottlenosed dolphin. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, & G. M. Burghardt (Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition (pp. 275–283). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In K. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234–259). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. W. (1995). Beethoven, Pastoral symphony. Cambridge music handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, H. (1980). Die Pastorale: Studien zur Geschichte eines musikalischen Topos. Neue Heidelberger Studien zur Musikwissenschaft, vol. 9. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Kemler, D. (2001). Music and embodied imagining: Metaphor and metonymy in Western art music. Ph. D. Dissertation, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998, February). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 33–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. E. (2007). Sung birds: Music, nature, and poetry in the later Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leman, M. (2008). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Margulis, E. H. (2014). On repeat: How music plays the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100(2), 254–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirka, D. (Ed). (2014). The Oxford handbook of topic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014). Introduction. In D. Mirka (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of topic theory (pp. 1–57). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monelle, R. (1992). Linguistics and semiotics in music. Contemporary music studies. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
(2000). The sense of music: Semiotic essays. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). The musical topic: Hunt, military and pastoral. Musical meaning and interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Oden, D. L., Thompson, R. K. R., & Premack, D. (2001). Can an ape reason analogically?: Comprehension and production of analogical problems by Sarah, a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 471–497). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ratner, L. G. (1980). Classic music: Expression, form, and style. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell, T. D. (1981, May 22). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212(4497), 947–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2006). Why don’t apes point? In N. J. Enfield, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 506–524). New York, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
(2008). Origins of human communication. The Jean Nicod lectures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veale, T., Feyaerts, K., & Forceville, C. J. (2013). Creativity and the agile mind. In T. Veale, K. Feyaerts, & C. J. Forceville (Eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon (Vol. 21, pp. 15–36). Applications of cognitive linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Will, R. (2002). The characteristic symphony in the age of Haydn and Beethoven. New perspectives in music history and criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. AMS Studies in Music. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Metaphor and music. In R. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 502–524). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 355–377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010, March-October). Music, emotion, analysis. Music Analysis, 29(i–iii), 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Foundations of musical grammar. Oxford Studies in Music Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Nijs, Luc & Bahareh Behzadaval
2024. Laying the Foundation for Augmented Reality in Music Education. IEEE Access 12 ► pp. 100628 ff. DOI logo
Naliwajek, Katarzyna
2022. Światło a muzyka. In Światło. Przyczynek do badań interdyscyplinarnych, DOI logo
Stevanovic, Melisa
2021. Monitoring and evaluating body knowledge: metaphors and metonymies of body position in children’s music instrument instruction. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.