Cover not available
Part of
Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Figurative Thought and Language 7] 2020
► pp. 153–173

Chapter 7
Metaphorical creativity in political cartoons

The migrant crisis in Europe

| Universidad Complutense de Madrid
This paper aims to explore the discursive construction of political meaning in cartoons on the present migrant crisis in Europe, and the potential of cartoon discourse for creativity in the use of metaphor and blending. Metaphors, blends and cultural models interact in the representation of events and social actors in cartoons, and the resulting synergistic effect may create meanings which both reflect and reinforce or reshape public opinion (Bergen, 2004; Marín-Arrese, 2008; Forceville, 2009; Schilperoord & Maes, 2009). From a Cognitive Linguistic approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (Charteris-Black, 2006; Hart, 2010; Musolff 2012a), the paper focuses on the use of metaphors and other cognitive mechanisms, and the ways in which political cartoons provide the ideal site for metaphorical creativity as recontextualization (Hidalgo Downing & Kraljevic Mujic, 2013).
Keywords: metaphor, blending, cultural models, creativity, recontextualization, political cartoons
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor and creativity in political cartooning
    • 2.1Humor in political cartooning
    • 2.2Cognitive mechanisms in cartoons
    • 2.3Creativity in political cartooning
  • 3.The migrant crisis in Europe: Some facts
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Case studies: Data sources and data collection
    • 4.2Hypotheses and research objectives
    • 4.3Research design: Procedure
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Metaphor in cartoons and in the language of politics and the media
    • 5.2Creativity in cartoons
  • 6.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 29 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.7.07mar
References (43)
References
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor, 10, 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. (2004). To awaken a sleeping giant. Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp. 23–35). Standford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. & Binsted, K. (2004). The cognitive linguistics of scalar humor. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp. 79–92). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brône, G., & Feyaerts, K. (2003). The cognitive linguistics of incongruity resolution: Marked reference-point structures in humor. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño, 20–25 July 2003. (Preprint n. 205). University of Leuven: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17 (5), 563–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak, & P. Chilton (Eds), A new research agenda in critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 19–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, S.T. (1817) Biographia literaria. Chapter XIV. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor. (pp. 19–42). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1905/1976). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ginman, M. & von Ungern-Sternberg, S. (2003). Cartoons as information. Journal of Information Science, 29, 69–77.Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (3), 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2002). Framing and temporality in political cartoons: A critical analysis of visual news discourse. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 39 (2), 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruner, C. R. (1997). The game of humour. A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, L. & Kraljevic Mujic, B. (2013). Introduction: Special issue on metaphorical creativity across modes. Metaphor and the Social World, 3 (2), 133–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, L., Kraljevic Mujic, B., & Núñez Perucha, B. (2013). Metaphorical creativity and recontextualisation in multimodal advertisements on e-business across time. Metaphor in the Social World, 13(2), 199–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koestler, A. ([1964] 1989). The act of creation. [London: Hutchinson] London: Arkana, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 663–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyratzis, S. (2003). Laughing metaphorically: Metaphor and humour in discourse. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 20–25 July 2003. Logroño: Universidad de La Rioja.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2005). Humour as subversion in political cartooning. In M. Labarta Postigo (Ed.), Approaches to critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–22). Valencia: Universitat de València, Servei de Publicacions. CD.Google Scholar
(2008). Cognition and culture in political cartoons. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5 (1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Political cartoon discourse. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction. Boston: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGraw, P. & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21, 1141–1149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. (1978). Most of all, they taught me happiness. New York: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2012a). The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (3), 301–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b). Immigrants and parasites: The history of a bio-social metaphor. In M. Messer, R. Schroeder, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives, (pp. 249–258). Vienna: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (1), 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, D. L. F., & Nilsen, A. P. (Eds.) (1983). The language of humour and the humour oflanguage. Proceedings of the 1982 WHIM Conference. 1983 WHIMSY, Western Humor and Irony Membership Serial Yearbook. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona State University Press.
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Boston, MA: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J. & Maes, A. (2009). Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, (pp. 213–240). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J. (2013). Metaphor, genre and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (1), 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein, & P. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 81–100). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism. Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2015). Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies, (3rd ed., pp. 2–22). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Assimakopoulos, Stavros & Anna Piata
2024. Chapter 5. Liquid racism, metaphor and the visual modality. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.