Part of
Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in PragmaticsEdited by Agnieszka Piskorska
[Figurative Thought and Language 8] 2020
► pp. 309–326
Edited by Agnieszka Piskorska
[Figurative Thought and Language 8] 2020
► pp. 309–326
Chapter 11Echoic irony in Philip Larkin’s poetry and its preservation in Polish translations
This chapter deals with the implications that the relevance-theoretic account of irony might have
for the interpretation of Philip Larkin’s poetry, acknowledged to be ironic by many literary critics. This is
exemplified by poems Church Going and Water. In reference to the latter, the
chapter also considers the impact of adopting this model on assessing translations. To illustrate this point,
two Polish translations of this poem are discussed. It is argued that incorporating an analysis of echoic
irony into the critique of the translations can shed light on the issue of their faithfulness to the
original.
Keywords: echoic irony, meaning reversal, Philip Larkin, translation, comparative study
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Relevance theory on irony
- 3.Philip Larkin’s echoes
- 4.Larkin’s irony in translation
- 4.1Larkin’s irony in translation. Conclusion
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes -
Acknowledgements -
References
References (21)
Clark H. H.,
&
Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On
the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 113(1), 121–126. 
Curco, C. (2000). Irony:
Negation, echo and
metarepresentation. Lingua 110, 257–280.
Diedrick, J. (n.d.) Martin
Amis on Philip Larkin. [URL]
Jarniewicz, J. (1994). The
uses of the commonplace in contemporary British poetry: Larkin, Dunn and
Raine. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
(2006). Larkin.
Odsłuchiwanie wierszy [Larkin: Listening to the
poems]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Larkin, P. (1990) Collected poems. London & Boston: Faber and Faber.
(1991). 44
wiersze [44
Poems]. Translated by S. Barańczak. Kraków: ARKA.
(2008). Zebrane.
Mniej oszukani, wesela w Zielone Świątki i wysokie okna [Collected: The less deceived, Whitsun weddings and high
windows]. Translated by Jacek Dehnel. Wrocław: Biuro Literackie.
Lodge, D. (1991). The
modes of modern writing. Great Britain: Edward Arnold.
Motion, A. (1993). Philip
Larkin. A writer’s
life. England: Faber and Faber.
Piskorska, A. (2016). Echo
and inadequacy in ironic utterances. Journal of
Pragmatics, 101, 54–65.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance.
Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
(1998). Irony
and relevance: A reply to Drs Seto, Hamamoto and
Yamanashi. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance
theory: Applications and
implications (pp. 283–293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Swarbrick, A. (1995). Out
of Reach. The Poetry of Philip
Larkin. Malaysia: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Szymańska, K. (2012). Larkina
portret zwielokrotniony. O dwóch polskich przekładach brytyjskiego
poety [Larkin’s portrait enlarged. On two Polish
translations of the British
Poet]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Wilson, D. (2000). Metarepresentations
in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (Ed.), Metarepresentations (pp. 411–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2006). The
pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or
pretence?. Lingua, 116, 1722–1743.
Wilson, D & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining
irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning
and
relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winiarski, J. (2010) Ten
stary szelma, Larkin (Rozmowa z Jackiem Dehnelem i Jerzym Jarniewiczem). [URL]
Yus, F. (2000). On
reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of
Communication, 10(1–2), 27–78.
(2016). Relevance
theory and contextual sources-centred analysis of irony. Current research and
compatibility. In M. Padilla Cruz (Ed.), Relevance
theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future
directions (pp. 147–171). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.