References (32)
References
Berber Sardinha, Tony. (2008). Metaphor probabilities in corpora. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 127–147). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T. (2012). An assessment of metaphor retrieval methods. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García, & A. M. Piquer Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 21–50). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (3): 149–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2015). Using Figurative Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and the space structuring model. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4): 295–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (2001). The lexicon. In M. Aronoff, & J. Rees-Millier (Eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics (pp. 238–264). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E. (2016). Cascades in metaphor and grammar: A case study of metaphors in the gun debate. Constructions and Frames, 8(2): 214–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, E., Hong, J., & Stickles, E. (2015). MetaNet: Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP 2015. Denver, Colorado, USA, 5 June 2015: 40–49.Google Scholar
Gabrilovich, E., & Markovitch, S. (2007). Computing semantic relatedness using wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1606–1611.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handl, S. (2011). The Conventionality of figurative language: A usage-based study. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). The scope of metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (79–92). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2015). Two ways of studying emotion metaphors in cognitive linguistics. Paper presented at the workshop Emotion Concepts in Use , June 25–26, 2015, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf.
Leong, C., Beigman Klebanov, B. and Shutova, E. (2018). A Report on the 2018 VUA Metaphor Detection Shared Task. Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Li, H., Zhu, K. Q., & Wang, H. (2013). Data-driven metaphor recognition and explanation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 379–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markert, K., & Nissim, M. (2006). Metonymic proper names: A corpus-based account. In A. Stefanowitsch, & S.Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 152–174). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nissim, M., & Markert, K. (2003). Syntactic features and word similarity for supervised metonymy resolution. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL2003).Google Scholar
Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Krishnan, R. (2004). Marketing research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y. (2006). What’s in a name? The automatic recognition of metonymical location names. Proceedings of the EACL-2006 Workshop on Making Sense of Sense: Bringing Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics Together (pp. 25–32). Trento: ACL.Google Scholar
Shutova, E. (2009). Sense-based interpretation of logical metonymy using a statistical method. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Student Research Workshop, Singapore, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shutova, E., Kaplan, J., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A. (2013). A computational model of logical metonymy. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 10(3), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shutova, E., & Sun, L. (2013). Unsupervised metaphor identification using hierarchical graph factorization clustering. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 2013, 978–988.Google Scholar
Shutova, E., Sun, L. & Korhonen, A. (2010). Metaphor Identification Using Verb and Noun Clustering. In Proceedings of COLING 2010, Beijing: China.Google Scholar
Shutova, E., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Statistical metaphor processing. Computational Linguistics, 39(2), 301–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). happiness in English and German: A metaphorical-pattern analysis. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 137–149). Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch, & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallington, A. M., Barnden, J. A., Barnden, M. A., Ferguson, F. J., & Glaseby, S. R. (2003). Metaphoricity signals: A corpus-based investigation. Birmingham: School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, U.K.Google Scholar
Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. (1987). A taxonomy of part–whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 417–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Brglez, Mojca, Omnia Zayed & Paul Buitelaar
2024. TCMeta: a multilingual dataset of COVID tweets for relation-level metaphor analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation DOI logo
Broccias, Cristiano
2022. A Cognitive Grammar approach to ‘metonymy’. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16],  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Farkhani, Sadaf, Søren Kelstrup Skovsen, Mads Dyrmann, Rasmus Nyholm Jørgensen & Henrik Karstoft
2021. Weed Classification Using Explainable Multi-Resolution Slot Attention. Sensors 21:20  pp. 6705 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.