Chapter published in:
Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi
[Figurative Thought and Language 9] 2020
► pp. 108127
References

References

Barcelona, A.
(2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View (pp. 7–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, J.
(2012) Resultative Constructions. In R. I. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp. 908–933). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
(2013) Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Broccias, C.
(2003) The English Change Network: Forcing Changes into Schemas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Tying events tight: a reply to Iwata (2006). Language Sciences, 38, 32–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Tight metaphors vs. deadly metonymies: a further rebuttal of Iwata’s bipartite adjectival resultatives. Language Sciences, 44, 40–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & M. Turner
(2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1991) It can’t go up the chimney down: paths and the English resultative. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 368–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iwata, S.
(2014a) “Tight links” make convenient metaphors but loose explanations: replying to a reply. Language Sciences, 42, 15–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Going further and further astray: why a loose explanation never becomes tight. Language Sciences, 45, 135–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1990) Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemmens, M.
(1998) Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity: Causative Constructions in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B.
(1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
(2013) Constraints on the co-occurrence of spatial and non-spatial paths in English: A closer look. Ms., Kobe University.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
available at www​.oed​.com).
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar