There is growing momentum towards a theory of languaging that acknowledges the
diverse semiotic repertoires people use with each other. This paper contributes
to this goal by providing further evidence from signed language discourse. In
particular, we examine iconic signs from Norwegian Sign Language, which can be
interpreted as both “regular” lexical signs and token depictions. This dual
potential is manipulated by signers in context. We analyze these signs as
descriptions and depictions, two different
modes of representation. Then we compare these signs to some of the description
and depiction that occurs in spoken language discourse. In this way we aim to
present some of the advantages of using description and depiction in analyses of
communication and interaction. By doing this, we also forge links between the
languaging of speakers and the languaging of signers.
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Wendy Sandler
(2003) Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign
languages. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 53–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bergman, Brita & Östen Dahl
(1994) Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the
tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Carl Bache, Hans Basbøll, & Carl-Erik Lindberg (Eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to
language typology (pp. 397–422). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Blyth, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, & Jenny Wang
(1990) I’m like, “Say what?!”: A new quotative in American oral
narrative. American Speech, 65 (3), 215–227.
(2017) Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of
ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 70 (2), 119–141.
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita
(2016) An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical
integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special
reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, First view, 1–32.
(2011) The body in scene depictions. In Cynthia Roy (Ed.), Discourse in signed languages (pp. 3–45). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
(2002) Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language
research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Emmorey, Karen & Brenda Falgier
(1999) Talking about space with space: Describing environments in
ASL. In Elizabeth Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 3–26). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Enfield, Nick J.
(2009) The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite
utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2012) The grammar of depiction: Exploring gesture and language in
Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Ph.D. Dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Trevor Johnston
(2014) Elaborating who’s what: A study of constructed action and clause
structure in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34 (2), 193–215.
Ferrara, Kathleen & Barbara Bell
(1995) Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed
dialogue introducers: The case of BE+LIKE. American Speech, 70 (3), 265–290.
Fox, Barbara A. & Jessica Robles
(2010) It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like. Discourse Studies, 12 (6), 715–738.
(2014) Gradient and categorically: Handshape’s two semiotic dimensions
in Israeli Sign Language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 207–225.
(1968) Languages of art: An approach to the theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
(2000) Action and embodiment within situated human
interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522.
(2012) Tre diskursmarkører i norsk tegnspråk: en studie av
blunk, blikkendring og nikk i åtte fortellinger [Three discourse markers in Norwegian Sign Language: A
study of blinking, eyegaze, and nodding in eight narratives]. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway.
(2002) Demonstrative suffering: The gestural (re)embodiment of
symptoms. Journal of Communication, 521, 597–616.
Hodge, Gabrielle & Lindsay Ferrara
(2014) Showing the story: Enactment as performance in Auslan
narratives. In Lauren Gawne & Jill Vaughan (Eds.), Selected papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic
Society 2013 (pp. 372–397). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne. Retrieved from [URL]
(2000) Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported
speech. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 33 (4), 425–454.
(2012) Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign Languages: An international handbook (pp. 816–481). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
(1992) The realization of the linguistic metafunctions in a sign
language. Language Sciences, 14 (4), 317–353.
(2007) Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language
linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
(2010) Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed
languages. Langage et societé, 1311 (March), 19–35.
(1972) Some relationships between body motion and speech: An analysis of
an example. In Aron Wolfe Siegman & Benjamin Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). New York: Pergamon Press.
(1980) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of
utterance. In Mary Ritchie Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2013) Exploring the utterance roles of visible bodily action: A
personal account. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication (Vol. 11, pp. 7–28). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2014) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of
‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 3691, 20130293.
(2015) Gesture and sign: Utterance uses of visible bodily
action. In Keith Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 33–46). London & New York: Routledge.
(2001) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (2), 143–188.
Liddell, Scott K.
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liddell, Scott K. & Melanie Metzger
(1998) Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 657–697.
Mather, Sue & Elizabeth Winston
(1998) Spatial mapping and involvement in ASL
storytelling. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Pinky extension and eye gaze: Language use in deaf communities (pp. 183–210). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Mathis, Terrie & George Yule
(1994) Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes, 18 (1), 63–76.
(1969) Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.
(1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1995) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign
Language. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 255–271). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
(2007) Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives:
The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua, 117 (7), 1315–1338.
(2007) Can constructed action be considered obligatory. Lingua, 117 (7), 1285–1314.
Quinto-Pozos, David & Sarika Mehta
(2010) Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed
language. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (3), 557–584.
(2010) Quoting the unspoken: An analysis of quotations in spoken
discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 3147–3160.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
(2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones, & Denis Burnham
(2005) Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion:
Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and
nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (3), 272–290.
(2006) Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in
reenactments. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39 (4), 377–409.
(2003) Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier
predicates. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 249–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
(2001) Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign
Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tervoort, Bernard Th
(1973) Could there be a human sign language?Semiotica, 91, 347–382.
(1981) Sign language in its social context. Annual Review of Anthropology, 101, 237–252.
(2004a) Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in
signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (2), 119–147.
(2007) Routes from gesture to language. In Elena Pizzuto, Paola Pietrandrea, & Raffaele Simone (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and
methodologies (pp. 107–131). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2003) ‘Classificatory’ constructions in Indo-Pakistani Sign Language:
Grammaticalization and lexicalization processes. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 113–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Cited by 19 other publications
Beukeleers, Inez & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
2022. Signed Languages: A Triangular Semiotic Dimension. Frontiers in Psychology 12
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.