The present study investigates deliberate and spontaneous temporal gestures in
Mandarin speakers. The results of our analysis show that when asked to gesture
about past and future events deliberately (Study 1), Mandarin speakers tend to
mimic space-time mappings in their spoken metaphors or graphic conventions for
time in Chinese culture, including sagittal mappings (front/past, back/future),
vertical mappings (up/past, down/future), and lateral mappings (left/past,
right/future). However, in their spontaneous co-speech gestures about time
(Study 2), more congruent gestures were produced on the lateral axis than on the
vertical axis. This suggests that although Mandarin speakers could think about
time vertically, they still showed a horizontal bias in their conceptions of
time. Speakers were also more likely to gesture according to future-in-front
mappings despite more past-in-front mappings found in spoken Chinese, suggesting
a dissociation of temporal language and temporal thought. These results
demonstrate that gesture is useful for revealing the spatial conceptualization
of time.
Ahrens, Kathleen & Chu-Ren Huang (2002). Time passing is motion. Language & Linguistics, 31, 491–519.
Alverson, Hoyt (1994). Semantics and experience: Universal metaphor of time in English,
Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bergen, Benjamin & Ting Ting Chan Lau (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto
time. Frontiers in psychology, 31, 109.
Boroditsky, Lera (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’
conceptions of time. Cognitive psychology, 43 (1), 1–22.
Casasanto, Daniel (2016). Temporal language and temporal thinking may not go hand in
hand. In (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English
speakers. Cognitive Linguistics, 231, 643–674.
Chen, Jenn-Yeu (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently?
Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 1041, 427–436.
Chen, Jenn-Yeu & Padraig O’Seaghdha (2013). Do Mandarin and English speakers think about time differently?
Review of existing evidence and some new data. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 411, 338–358.
Cienki, Alan (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal
metaphorical expressions. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Clark, Herbert (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Timothy E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Cooperrider, Kensy, Rafael Núñez, & Eve Sweetser (2014). Temporal gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Jana Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication (Vol. 21, pp. 1781–1788). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
de la Fuente, Juanma, Julio Santiago, Antony Román, Cristina Dumitrache, & Daniel Casasanto (2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How
culture shapes spatial conceptions of Time. Psychological Science, 251, 1682–1690.
de Sousa, Hilário (2012). Generational differences in the orientation of time in
Cantonese. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 255.
Duffy, Sarah (2014). The role of cultural artifacts in the interpretation of
metaphorical expressions about time. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 (2), 94–112.
Gu, Yan, Lisette Mol, Marieke Hoetjes, & Marc Swerts (2013). What can Chinese speakers’ temporal gestures reveal about their
thinking about time? In Proceedings of the Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting (TiGeR
2013) (The combined meeting of the 10th international Gesture Workshop (GW)
and the 3rd Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN) conference. Unknown
Publisher).
Gu, Yan, Lisette Mol, Marieke Hoetjes, & Marc Swerts (2014). Does language shape the production and perception of
gestures? In Paul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane, & Brian Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive science
Society (pp. 547–552). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Gullberg, Marianne, Henriëtte Hendriks, & Maya Hickmann (2008). Learning to talk and gesture about motion in
French. First Language, 281, 200–236.
Haspelmath, Martin (1997). From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s
languages. Munich: Lincom.
January, David & Edward Kako (2007). Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to
Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 1041, 417–426.
Kendon, Adam (1993). Space, time and gesture. Degres, 741, 3b–16b.
Kita, Sotaro & Aslı Özyürek (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of
speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of
spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (1), 16–32.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, & Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western
thought. New York: Basic Books.
Le Guen, Olivier, Pool Balam, & Lorena Ildefonsa (2012). No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec
Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 1–15.
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, David (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meier, Brian & Michael Robinson (2005). The metaphorical representation of affect. Metaphor and Symbol, 201, 239–257.
Moore, Kevin Ezra (2006). Space to time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 171, 199–244.
Núñez, Rafael, Vicente Neumann, & Manuel Mamani (1997). Los mapeos conceptuales de la concepción del tiempo
en la lengua Aymara del Norte de Chile [Conceptual mappings in the conceptualization of time
in northern Chile’s Aymara]. Boletín de Educación de la Universidad Católica del Norte, 281, 47–55.
Núñez, Rafael & Eve Sweetser (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara
language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals
of time. Cognitive Science, 301, 401–450.
Núñez, Rafael & Kensy Cooperrider (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17 (5), 220–229.
Özyürek, Aslı & Sotaro Kita (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in
speech, gesture, and conceptualisation. In Martín Hahn & Scott Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Conference of the Cognitive
Science Society (pp. 507–512). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Radden, Günter (2011). Spatial time in the West and the East. In Mario Brdar, Marija Omazic, Visnja Pavicic Takac, Tanja Gradecak-Erdeljic, & Gabrijela Buljan (Eds.), Space and time in language (pp. 1–40). Frankfurt-Main et al.: Peter Lang.
Sanvido, Guilherme, Julio de Rose, & Jenn-Yeu Chen (2011). Chinese speakers do not think about time differently than Portuguese speakers. Poster presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, USA, November 3–6.
Sullivan, Karen & Linh Thuy Bui (2016). With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that time
approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (2), 205–233.
Talmy, Leonard (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical
forms. In Timothy Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 31, pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tse, Chi-Shing & Jeanette Altarriba (2008). Evidence against linguistic relativity in Chinese and English: A
case study of spatial and temporal metaphors. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8 (3), 335–357.
Walker, Esther & Kensy Cooperrider (2016). The continuity of metaphor: evidence from temporal
gestures. Cognitive Science, 401, 481–495.
Walker, Esther & Núñez Rafael (2016). Speaking, gesturing, reasoning. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time (pp. 43–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yu, Ning (2012). The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 441, 1335–1354.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Athanasopoulos, Panos & Rui Su
2024. The Effect of COVID‐Related Quarantine and Attitudes on Time Conceptualization: Evidence From Temporal Focus and Implicit Space‐Time Mappings. Language Learning 74:S1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Feist, Michele I. & Sarah E. Duffy
2023. Cognitive Science: Piecing Together the Puzzle. Cognitive Science 47:7
Feist, Michele I. & Sarah E. Duffy
2023. To each their own: a review of individual differences and metaphorical perspectives on time. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Li, Heng
2023. Personality in your hands: How extraversion traits influence preference for pointing in Chinese people. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
2022. Metonymic event-based time interval concepts in Mandarin Chinese—Evidence from time interval words. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Sun, Juan & Qiang Zhang
2021. How do Mandarin speakers conceptualize time? Beyond the horizontal and vertical dimensions. Cognitive Processing 22:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Callizo-Romero, Carmen, Slavica Tutnjević, Maja Pandza, Marc Ouellet, Alexander Kranjec, Sladjana Ilić, Yan Gu, Tilbe Göksun, Sobh Chahboun, Daniel Casasanto & Julio Santiago
2020. Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27:6 ► pp. 1247 ff.
Gawne, Lauren, Chelsea Krajcik, Helene N. Andreassen, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Barbara F. Kelly
2018. Karma or Immortality: Can Religion Influence Space‐Time Mappings?. Cognitive Science 42:3 ► pp. 1041 ff.
LI, Heng & Yu CAO
2018. 时间焦点对前后方向上内隐时空映射的影响——来自汉族和羌族的证据. Acta Psychologica Sinica 50:10 ► pp. 1083 ff.
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
2018. Time will tell: Temporal landmarks influence metaphorical associations between space and time. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 677 ff.
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
2019. Planning for the future: The relationship between conscientiousness, temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences 141 ► pp. 111 ff.
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
2022. Time for politics: The relationship between political attitude and implicit space-time mappings. Current Psychology 41:3 ► pp. 1184 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.