Article published In:
GestureVol. 18:1 (2019) ► pp.83–109
Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture
Data is central to scholarly research, but the nature and location of data used is often under-reported in research
publications. Greater transparency and citation of data have positive effects for the culture of research. This article presents the results
of a survey of data citation in six years of articles published in the journal Gesture (12.1–17.2). Gesture researchers
draw on a broad range of data types, but the source and location of data are often not disclosed in publications. There is also still a
strong research focus on only a small range of the world’s languages and their linguistic diversity. Published papers rarely cite back to
the primary data, unless it is already published. We discuss both the implications of these findings and the ways that scholars in the field
of gesture studies can build a positive culture around open data.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background
- Survey of data citation in Gesture
- Source of data
- Location of data
- Data types
- Languages included
- Data citation conventions
- Results
- Source of data
- Location of data
- Data types
- Languages included
- Data citation conventions
- Discussion
- Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (84)
References
Alibali, Martha W., Andrew G. Young, Noelle M. Crooks, Amelia Yeo, Matthew S. Wolfgram, Iasmine M. Ledesma, Mitchell J. Nathan, Ruth Breckinridge Church, & Eric J. Knuth (2013). Students learn more when their teacher has learned to gesture effectively. Gesture, 13 (2), 210–233.
Andreassen, Helene N., Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Lauren Collister, Philipp Conzett, Christopher Cox, Koenraad De Smedt, Bradley McDonnell, and the Research Data Alliance Linguistic Data Interest Group (2019). Tromsø recommendations for citation of research data in linguistics (Version 1). Research Data Alliance.
Ball, Alex & Monica Duke (2015). How to cite datasets and link to publications. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: [URL]
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Lauren Gawne, Barbara F. Kelly, & Tyler Heston (2017). A survey of current reproducibility practices in linguistics journals, 2003–2012. [URL]
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Helene N. Andreassen, Lauren Gawne, Gary Holton, Susan Smythe Kung, Peter Pulsifer, & Lauren B. Collister, The Data Citation and Attribution in Linguistics Group, & the Linguistics Data Interest Group (2018). The Austin Principles of Data Citation in Linguistics. Version 1.0. [URL] (accessed Nov 23, 2018).
Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L., Lauren Gawne, Susan Smythe Kung, Barbara F. Kelly, Tyler Heston, Gary Holton, Peter Pulsifer, David I. Beaver, Shobhana Chelliah, Stanley Dubinsky, Richard P. Meier, Nicholas Thieberger, Karen Rice, & Anthony C. Woodbury (2018). Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field. Linguistics, 56 (1), 1–18.
Buckheit, Jonathan B. & David Donoho (1995). WaveLab and reproducible research. In A. Antoniadis & G. Oppenheim (Eds.), Wavelets and statistics (pp. 55–81). New York: Springer.
Chambers, Chris (2017). The seven deadly sins of psychology: A manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chui, Kawai & Huei-ling Lai (2008). The NCCU Corpus of Spoken Chinese: Mandarin, Hakka, and Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 6 (2), 119–144.
Corpus of English for academic and professional purposes. (2014). Corpus of videos and accompanying transcripts from educational contexts. Unpublished raw data. [URL]
de Jorio, Andrea (1832). La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano. Naples: Stamperia e cartiera del Fibreno.
de Leeuw, Jan (2001). Reproducible research: The bottom line. UCLA Department of Statistics papers. [URL] (accessed October 9, 2018).
Donoho, David L. (2010). An invitation to reproducible computational research. Biostatistics, 111, 385–388.
Gawne, Lauren (collector) (2009). Kagate (Nepal) (SUY1), Digital collection managed by PARADISEC. [Open Access].
Gawne, Lauren, Barbara F. Kelly, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, & Tyler Heston (2017). Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions. Language Documentation & Conservation, 111, 157–189. 10125/24731
Gawne, Lauren & Suzy J. Styles. (still in press). Situating linguistics in the social science data movement. In Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Bradley McDonnell, & Eve Koller (Eds.), The open handbook of linguistic data management. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press Open.
Gezelter, Dan (2009). Being scientific: Falsifiability, verifiability, empirical tests, and reproducibility. The OpenScience project. Online: [URL] (accessed Nov 23, 2018).
Green, Jennifer, Gail Woods & Ben Foley (2011). Looking at language: Appropriate design for sign language resources in remote Australian Indigenous communities. In Nicholas Thieberger, Linda Barwick, Rosey Billington, & Jill Vaughan (Eds.), Sustainable data from digital research: Humanities perspectives on digital scholarship (pp. 66–89). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Harris, Richard (2017). Rigor mortis: how sloppy science creates worthless cures, crushes hope, and wastes billions. New York: Basic Books.
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Maria Michaelis (2014). Annotated corpora of small languages as refereed publications: A vision. Diversity Linguistics Comment. Online: [URL] (accessed Nov 23, 2018).
Ioannidis, John P. A. (2012). Why science isn’t necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7 (6): 645–654.
Jasny, Barbara R., Gilbert Chin, Lisa Chong, & Sacha Vignieri (2011). Introduction to special issue: Again, and again, and again. Science, 334 (6060), 1225.
John, Leslie K., George Loewenstein, & Drazen Prelec (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23 (5), 524–532.
Jones, Sarah (2011). How to develop and data management and sharing plan. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: [URL]
Kung, Susan Smythe. (still in press). Developing a data management plan. In Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Bradley McDonnell, & Eve Koller, The open handbook of linguistic data management. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press Open.
Lücking, Andy, Kirsten Bergman, Florian Hahn, Stefan Kopp, & Hannes Rieser (2013). Data-based analysis of speech and gesture: The Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment Corpus (SaGA) and its applications. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 7 (1/2), 5–18.
MacWhinney, Brian (2007). The TalkBank project. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, & Hermann L. Moisl (Eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora: Synchronic databases (Vol. 11, pp. 163–180). Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Morris, Desmond, Peter Collett, Peter Marsh, & Marie O’Shaughnessay (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London: Cape.
Nelson, Leif D., Joseph Simmons, & Uri Simonsohn (2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 691, 511–534.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251), aac4716.
Skubisz, Joanna (2017). A systematic review of the methods reported in the journal GESTURE. iGesto. Porto: February 2–3.
Thieberger, Nicholas, Anna Margetts, Stephen Morey, & Simon Musgrave (2016). Assessing annotated corpora as research output. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36 (1), 1–21.
Vines, Timothy H., Arianne Y. K. Albert, Rose L. Andrew, Florence Débarre, Dan G. Bock, Michelle T. Franklin, Kimberly J. Gilbert, Jean-Sébastien Moore, Sébastien Renaut, & Diana J. Rennison (2014). The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Current Biology, 24 (1), 94–97.
Whyte, Angus (2015). Where to keep research data: DCC checklist for evaluating data repositories. V.1.1. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Owoyele, Babajide, James Trujillo, Gerard de Melo & Wim Pouw
2022.
Masked-Piper: Masking personal identities in visual recordings while preserving multimodal information.
SoftwareX 20
► pp. 101236 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.