In this paper, we analyze single-handed hold gestures that convey either the height or the shape of an object. The analyses include (1) differentiating which parts of the hands are profiled in each gesture, (2) considering whether these parts are occluded by other fingers, and (3) deriving predictions from (1) and (2) with regard to what hand shape characteristics favor height or shape gestures. In a production experiment, we asked participants to indicate either the height of a small ball or its shape, using only the index finger and the thumb. As predicted, the middle, ring and little finger were more curled in for height gestures. For shape gestures, those three fingers were more raised. In two perception experiments, participants viewed virtual hands from a computer-generated continuum of hand-shape stimuli. We found that if the middle, ring and little finger were more curled in, participants were more likely to interpret a gesture as indicating height. Our results pose new questions with regard to the relation between the physical form of a gesture and the inferred imaginary forms that are involved in deriving meaning from a gesture.
(2011) Social science for pennies. Science, 334, 307.
(2013) A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (vol. 11, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
(1990) The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
(2005) Image schemas and gesture. In Beate Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–442). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Emmorey, Karen & Melissa Herzig
(2003) Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages (pp. 222–246). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gamer, Matthias, Jim Lemon, & Puspendra Singh
(2012) irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84.
Gentleman, Robert & Duncan Temple Lang
(2007) Statistical analyses and reproducible research. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 161, 1–23.
(2016) Towards a theory of gesture form analysis. Imaginary forms as part of gesture conceptualisation, with empirical support from motion-capture data. Doctoral thesis, RWTH Aachen University.
Hassemer, Julius, Gina Joue, Klaus Willmes, & Irene Mittelberg
(2011) Dimensions and mechanisms of form constitution: Towards a formal description of gestures. In
Proceedings of Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN) 2011
(2009) Do iconic hand gestures really contribute to the communication of semantic information in a face-to-face context?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33 (2), 73–88.
(1890) The principles of psychology, Vol. 21. New York: Henry Holt.
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kita, Sotaro, Ingeborg van Gijn, & Harry van der Hulst
(1998) Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Ipke Wachsmuth & Martin Fröhlich (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the international gesture workshop, september 17–19, 1997. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 13711, pp. 23–35). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
Landis, J. Richard & Gary G. Koch
(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159–174.
(2010) Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.
Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh
(2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2014) Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (vol. 21, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Parker, Ellen M., Randy L. Diehl, & Keith R. Kluender
(1986) Trading relations in speech and nonspeech. Perception & Psychophysics, 39(2), 129–142.
Peng, Roger D
(2011) Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 3341, 1226–1227.
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Repp, Bruno H
(1982) Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92 (1), 81–110.
(2006) Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in shape descriptions. Doctoral thesis, University of Bielefeld.
(2011) A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods, 431, 155–167.
Stokoe, William C
(2005/1960) Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (1), 3–37.
2022. Interaction between grasping and articulation: How vowel and consonant pronunciation influences precision and power grip responses. PLOS ONE 17:3 ► pp. e0265651 ff.
Woodin, Greg, Bodo Winter, Marcus Perlman, Jeannette Littlemore, Teenie Matlock & Dennis Tay
2020. 'Tiny numbers' are actually tiny: Evidence from gestures in the TV News Archive. PLOS ONE 15:11 ► pp. e0242142 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.