Research on manual gesture has been preoccupied with unconventionalized and conventionalized extremes. Homesigns developed spontaneously by deaf children unexposed to standardized sign languages have been used as a window onto more general socio-cognitive processes of semiotic systemization. Spontaneous, idiosyncratic gesticulation has been contrasted with shared, highly regimented “emblematic” or “quotable” gestures to reveal a cline of conventionalization. I direct attention here to the vast and relatively understudied middle ground in which manual gesture shows evidence of only partial conventionalization. Using a corpus of televised political debate data from a US presidential campaign cycle, I note, first, that there is nothing as coherent and systematized as a “register” of political gesture here. Focusing on gesture variation in precision-grip and index-finger-extended gestures of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, I identify form-functional “pragmatic affinities” among gestures that have not crystallized into stable types or classes. Dwelling on the specificities of gesture variation, with its mercurial forms and incomplete conventionalization, may allow us to appreciate the processual complexities of gestural enregisterment in social and historical life.
Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, John (1962). How to do things with words. Edited by J. O. Urmson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bate, Bernard (2009). Tamil oratory and the Dravidian aesthetic: Democratic practice in South India. New York: Columbia University Press.
Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark (2002). The proper treatments of focus sensitivity. In Line Mikkelsen & Chris Potts (Eds.), WCCFL 21 Proceedings (pp. 15–28). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Borges, Jorge Luis (1962). Funes, the memorious. In Jorge Luis Borges, Labyrinths: Selected stories & other writings (pp. 65–71). New York: New Directions.
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni, & Susan Goldin-Meadow (2012). When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Nat Lang Linguist Theory, 30 (1), 1–31.
Enfield, Nick J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, Luke, & Michael Lempert (2014). Poetics and performativity. In Nick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, & Jack Sidnell (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 485–515). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, James J. (1974). Our ancestors spoke in pairs. In Richard Bauman & Joel Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 65–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fromkin, Victoria (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. San Francisco: Academic Press.
Goffman, Erving (1956). The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 581, 472–502.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan (2014). Homesign: When gesture is called upon to be language. In Cornelia Müller, Alan J. Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Vol. 21 (pp. 113–125). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Heidi Feldman (1977). The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science, 197 (4301), 401–403.
Goodman, Nelson (1972). Seven strictures on similarity. In Nelson Goodman (Ed.), Problems and projects (pp. 437–446). New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Goodwin, Charles (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Gundel, Jeanette K. (1999). On different kinds of focus. In Peter Bosch & Rob A. van der Sandt (Ed.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 293–305). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gundel, Jeanette K. & Thorstein Fretheim (2006). Topic and focus. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory L. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 175–196). Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, & Ron Zacharski (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69 (2), 274–307.
Kendon, Adam (1988). How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto: Hogrefe.
Kendon, Adam (1990). Gesticulation, quotable gestures, and signs. In Michael Moerman and Masaichi Nomura (Eds.), Culture embodied (pp. 53–78). Osaka, Japan: National Museum of Ethnology.
Kendon, Adam (1992). Some recent work from Italy on ʻquotable gestures’ (ʻemblems’). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 21, 92–108.
Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lempert, Michael (2012a). Discipline and debate: The language of violence in a Tibetan Buddhist monastery. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lempert, Michael (2012b). Where the action isn’t: Review article on Nick Enfield’sThe anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Language in Society, 41 (2), 259–266.
Lempert, Michael (2014). Imitation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 431, 379–395.
Lempert, Michael & Michael Silverstein (2012). Creatures of politics: Media, message, and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola-Gilbert (2016). Multifunctionality of hand gestures and material conduct during closing argument. Gesture, 15 (1), 79–114.
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, David (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morris, Desmond (1977). Manwatching: a field guide to human behaviour. London: Cape.
Newkirk, Don, Edward S. Klima, Carlene Canady Pendersen, & Ursula Bellugi (1980). Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In Victoria Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 165–197). San Francisco: Academic Press.
Parmentier, Richard J. (1994a). Naturalization of convention. In Richard J. Parmentier (Ed.), Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology (pp. 175–190). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Parmentier, Richard J. (1994b). The semiotic regimentation of social life. In Richard J. Parmentier (Ed.), Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology (pp. 125–155). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Prince, Ellen F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press.
Rains, Charleen (1992). “You die for life”: On the use of poetic devices in argumentation. Language in Society, 211, 253–276.
Sapir, Edward (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: A Harvest/HBJ Book.
Schuler, Edgar A. (1944). V for victory: a study in symbolic social control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 191, 283–299.
Senghas, Ann (2003). Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development, 18 (4), 511–531.
Senghas, Ann & Marie Coppola (2001). Children creating language: How Nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12 (4), 323–328.
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23 (3/4), 193–229.
Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford, & Susan Goldin-Meadow (1993). Once is not enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language, 69 (4), 683–715.
Streeck, Jürgen (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41 (2), 154–186.
Tannen, Deborah (2007). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teßendorf, Sedinha (2014). Emblems, quotable gestures, or conventionalized body movements. In Cornelia Müller, Alan J. Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill, & Sedinha Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Vol. 21 (pp. 82–100). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
2024. What’s the point of Donald Trump? Deictic gestures in the service of right-wing populism. Social Semiotics► pp. 1 ff.
Ladewig, Silva H.
2024. Recurrent Gestures: Cultural, Individual, and Linguistic Dimensions of Meaning-Making. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 32 ff.
Yang, Min & Min Wang
2024. Recurrent gestures and embodied stance-taking in courtroom opening statements. Text & Talk
Zhang, Icy (Yunyi), Tina Izad & Erica A. Cartmill
2024. Embodying Similarity and Difference: The Effect of Listing and Contrasting Gestures During U.S. Political Speech. Cognitive Science 48:3
2018. This is not a course in trial practice : Multimodal participation in objections. Journal of Pragmatics 129 ► pp. 199 ff.
Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola Gilbert
2018. Multimodal Conduct in the Law,
[no author supplied]
2018. Motives and Accusations. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 109 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Exhibits, Tapes, and Inconsistency. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 153 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Rhythmic Gestures and Semanticity. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 213 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Index. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 244 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Preface. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Multimodal Conduct. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 7 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. The Transformation of Evidence into Precedent. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 60 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Nailing Down an Answer. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 125 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Material Mediated Gestures. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 181 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Conclusion. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 228 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Introduction. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Co-Constructing Expert Identity. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 27 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Negotiating Intertextuality. In Multimodal Conduct in the Law, ► pp. 82 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.