Gesture and language
Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages
Sherman Wilcox | University of New Mexico
In this paper I explore the role of gesture in the development of signed languages. Using data from American Sign Language, Catalan Sign Language, French Sign Language, and Italian Sign Language, as well as historical sources describing gesture in the Mediterranean region, I demonstrate that gesture enters the linguistic system via two distinct routes. In one, gesture serves as a source of lexical and grammatical morphemes in signed languages. In the second, elements become directly incorporated into signed language morphology, bypassing the lexical stage. Finally, I propose a unifying framework for understanding the gesture-language interface in signed and spoken languages.
Published online: 10 June 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.04wil
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
No author info given
2006.
In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics [ACL], ],
No author info given
2014.
In Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47],
No author info given
2021.
In Grammatical and Sociolinguistic aspects of Ethiopian Languages [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 48],
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
2016.
In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,
Beaupoil-Hourdel, Pauline & Camille Debras
2017. Developing communicative postures.
Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Brentari, Diane
2019.
In Sign Language Phonology,
Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig & Cornelia Müller
2018.
In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247],
► pp. 223 ff.
Cabeza-Pereiro, Carmen
2013. Modality and linguistic change in Spanish Sign Language (LSE).
CogniTextes :10
Cooperrider, Kensy, Natasha Abner & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2018. The Palm-Up Puzzle: Meanings and Origins of a Widespread Form in Gesture and Sign.
Frontiers in Communication 3
Corina, David P. & Michael Grosvald
2012. Exploring perceptual processing of ASL and human actions: Effects of inversion and repetition priming.
Cognition 122:3 ► pp. 330 ff.
de Vos, Connie
2015. The Kata Kolok Pointing System: Morphemization and Syntactic Integration.
Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1 ► pp. 150 ff.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
2020. Markers of epistemic modality and their origins.
Studies in Language ► pp. 1 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Rolf Piene Halvorsen
2017. Depicting and describing meanings with iconic signs in Norwegian Sign
Language.
Gesture 16:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
Fuks, Orit
2016. Intensifier actions in Israeli Sign Language (ISL) discourse.
Gesture 15:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Grosvald, Michael, Eva Gutierrez, Sarah Hafer & David Corina
2012. Dissociating linguistic and non-linguistic gesture processing: Electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.
Brain and Language 121:1 ► pp. 12 ff.
Haviland, John B.
2015. Hey!.
Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1 ► pp. 124 ff.
Haviland, John B.
2019.
In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348],
► pp. 520 ff.
Hohenberger, Annette
2008. The word in sign language: empirical evidence and theoretical controversies.
Linguistics 46:2
Johnston, Trevor
2018. A corpus-based study of the role of headshaking in negation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language): Implications for signed language typology.
Linguistic Typology 22:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Johnston, Trevor, Jane van Roekel & Adam Schembri
2016. On the Conventionalization of Mouth Actions in Australian Sign Language.
Language and Speech 59:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lakhfif, Abdelaziz & Mohamed Tayeb Laskri
2016. A frame-based approach for capturing semantics from Arabic text for text-to-sign language MT.
International Journal of Speech Technology 19:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Mesh, Kate & Lynn Hou
2018. Negation in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language.
Gesture 17:3 ► pp. 330 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Embodied frames and scenes.
Gesture 16:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns.
Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
Mittelberg, Irene
2019. Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
Nolan, Brian & Lorraine Leeson
2011.
In Handbook of Research on E-Learning Standards and Interoperability,
► pp. 482 ff.
Nolan, Brian & Lorraine Leeson
2012.
In Virtual Learning Environments,
► pp. 786 ff.
Pfau, Roland
2015.
In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],
► pp. 9 ff.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2015.
In Signs and Structures [Benjamins Current Topics, 71],
► pp. 71 ff.
Quinto-Pozos, David & Fey Parrill
2015. Signers and Co-speech Gesturers Adopt Similar Strategies for Portraying Viewpoint in Narratives.
Topics in Cognitive Science 7:1 ► pp. 12 ff.
Tomasuolo, Elena, Chiara Bonsignori, Pasquale Rinaldi & Virginia Volterra
2020. The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS).
Cognitive Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
WILBUR, RONNIE B. & EVGUENIA MALAIA
2008. CONTRIBUTIONS OF SIGN LANGUAGE RESEARCH TO GESTURE UNDERSTANDING: WHAT CAN MULTIMODAL COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS LEARN FROM SIGN LANGUAGE RESEARCH.
International Journal of Semantic Computing 02:01 ► pp. 5 ff.
Wilcox, Sherman
2010. Review of Streeck, Grothues & Villanueva (2009): Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of Meaning.
Sign Language & Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino
2016. Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages.
Cognitive Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.