Cover not available
Review published In:
Gesture
Vol. 4:1 (2004) ► pp.101–107
Book review

Scott K. Liddell. Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press, (2003).

Reviewed by
Published online: 10 June 2004
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.08sch
References (15)
References
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Wendy Sandler (2003). Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Cogill-Koez, Dorothea (2000). Signed language classifier predicates: Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign language and linguistics, 3(2), 153–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen & Melissa Herzig (2003). Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth (2003). How composite is a fall? Adults’ and children’s descriptions of different types of falls in Danish Sign Language. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1996). When intuitions fail. In Lisa McNair, Kora Singer, Lise M. Dolbrin, & Michelle M. Aucon (Eds.). Papers from the Parasession on Theory and Data in Linguistics. Chicago Linguistic Society, 321, 77–106.Google Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav (2000). Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (Ed.) (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan, & Robert G. Lee (2000). The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Okrent, Arika (2002). A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Richard P. Meier & Kearsy Cormier (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam (2001). Issues in the analysis of polycomponential verbs in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Singleton, Jenny L., Jill P. Morford, & Susan Goldin-Meadow (1993). Once is not enough: Standards of well-formednes in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language, 69(4), 683–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the communication systems of the American deaf. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.