Richard W. Byrne | School of Psychology, University of St Andrews
Any study of communicative gesture must identify which movements are purposeful (intentionality) and which examples of movements should be grouped into a single gesture (granularity). Where researchers studying human gesture are aided by linguistic context, researchers studying non-human primates must rely on their subjects’ movements alone to address these questions. We propose an approach to intentionality and granularity in non-human primate gesture based first on the possibility that only some, but not all individuals that use particular movements do so as intentional gestures, and second on the premise that gestures found to have specific meanings reflect real-world distinctions made by the animals. We apply this approach to the behavior of 28 captive orangutans and identify 64 distinct gestures, 29 of which have specific, predictable meanings.
2020. Is Conceptual Diversity an Advantage for Scientific Inquiry? A Case Study on the Concept of ‘Gesture’ in Comparative Psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 54:4 ► pp. 805 ff.
Molesti, Sandra, Adrien Meguerditchian & Marie Bourjade
2020. Gestural communication in olive baboons (Papio anubis): repertoire and intentionality. Animal Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Byrne, R. W., E. Cartmill, E. Genty, K. E. Graham, C. Hobaiter & J. Tanner
2017. Great ape gestures: intentional communication with a rich set of innate signals. Animal Cognition 20:4 ► pp. 755 ff.
Cartmill, Erica A. & Richard W. Byrne
2010. Semantics of primate gestures: intentional meanings of orangutan gestures. Animal Cognition 13:6 ► pp. 793 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.