Cover not available
Part of
Why Gesture?: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating
Edited by Ruth Breckinridge Church, Martha W. Alibali and Spencer D. Kelly
[Gesture Studies 7] 2017
► pp. 285–316

Chapter 13
Making and breaking common ground

How teachers use gesture to foster learning in the classroom

Teachers regularly use gesture as part of multimodal instruction to both break and make common ground. Teachers break common ground when they introduce new ideas and new mathematical practices. Teachers make common ground by connecting new ideas to students’ prior knowledge and to current disciplinary practices. Our findings show the importance of linking gestures, a highly regulated aspect of pedagogical communication, which is used to foster connection building, while reducing the cognitive demands for learners. A focus on the function of pedagogical gesture for managing common ground provides an account of classroom learning that resolves the Learning Paradox by examining the establishment, maintenance and disruption of common ground.

Article outline
  • Common ground and learning
  • Gesture and common ground
    • Past research: Gesture and common ground in conversational contexts
    • Past research: Gesture and common ground in the classroom
  • The tension between making and breaking common ground
  • Case 1.Breaking and making common ground when introducing algebraic expressions
  • Case 2.Breaking and making common ground when introducing polynomial multiplication
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7.14nat
References

References

Alibali, Martha W., & Nathan, Mitchell J.
2007 “Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson.” In Video Research in the Learning Sciences, Ricki Goldman, Roy Pea, Brigid Barron, & Sharon J. Derry (eds) 349–365. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Nathan, Mitchell J., & Fujimori, Yuka
2011 “Gestures in the mathematics classroom: What's the point?” In Developmental Cognitive Science Goes To School, Nancy L. Stein & Stephen W. Raudenbush (eds) 219–234. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Nathan, Mitchell J., Church, R. Breckinridge, Wolfgram, Matthew S., Kim, Suyeon, & Knuth, Eric J.
2013 “Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: forging common ground by resolving trouble spots.” ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education 45(3): 425–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Nathan, Mitchell J., Wolfgram, Matthew S., Church, R. Breckinridge, Jacobs, Steven A., Johnson Martinez, Chelsea, & Knuth, Eric J.
2014 “How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis.” Cognition and Instruction 32 (1): 65–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, Carl
1985 “Toward a solution of the learning paradox.” Review of Educational Research 55 (2): 201–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bem, Jolanta, Jacobs, Steven A., Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Levine, Susan C., Alibali, Martha W. & Nathan, Mitchell
2012 “Gesture’s benefit for instruction: Attention coordination or embodied cognition?” Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Caglayan, Günhan
2013 “Prospective mathematics teachers’ sense making of polynomial multiplication and factorization modeled with algebra tiles.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 16 (5): 349–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, R. Breckinridge, Garber, Philip, & Rogalski, Kathryn
2007 “The role of gesture in memory and social communication.” Gesture 7: 137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., & Marshall, C. R.
1981 “Definite reference and mutual knowledge.” In Elements of Discourse Understanding, Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie Webber, & Ivan Sag (eds) 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Schaefer, E. F.
1989 “Contributing to discourse.” Cognitive Science 13: 259–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Paul
1989 “Experiential, cognitive, and anthropological perspectives in mathematics education.” For the Learning of Mathematics 9 (2): 32–42.Google Scholar
1995 “Cultural tools and mathematical learning: A case study.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26: 362–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Susan W., Duffy, Ryan G., & Fenn, Kimberly M.
2013 “Consolidation and transfer of learning after observing hand gesture.” Child Development 84 (6): 1863–1871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio
2003 “The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358: 517–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerwing, Jennifer, & Bavelas, Janet B.
2004 “Linguistic influences on gesture’s form.” Gesture 4 (2): 157–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Kim, San, & Singer, Melissa
1999 “What the teachers’ hands tell the students’ minds about math.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 720–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holler, Judith, & Stevens, Rachel
2007 “The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (1): 4–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holler, Judith, & Wilkin, Katie
2009 “Communicating common ground: How mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task.” Language and Cognitive Processes 24 (2): 267–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holler, Judith, Tutton, Mark, & Wilkin, Katie
2011 “Co-speech gestures in the process of meaning coordination.” Proceedings of the 2nd Gesture and Speech in Interaction Conference, Bielefeld, Germany.Google Scholar
Kelly, Spencer D., Byrne, Kelly, & Holler, Judith
2011 “Raising the ante of communication: Evidence for enhanced gesture use in high stakes situations.” Information 2: 579–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, Timothy, LeBaron, Curtis, Goodwin, Charles, & Feltovich, Paul
2001 “Dissecting common ground: Examining an instance of reference repair.” In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 516–521. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Núñez, Rafael
2001 Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Elise, Yeo, Amelia, Crooks, Noelle M., Nathan, Mitchell J., & Alibali, Martha W.
2014 “Teaching about confidence intervals: How instructors connect ideas using speech and gesture.” In Learning and Becoming in Practice: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences, William Penuel, Susan A. Jurow, & Kevin O'Connor (eds). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
1985 “So you think gestures are nonverbal?” Psychological Review 92: 350–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David, & Duncan, Susan
2000 “Growth points in thinking-for-speaking.” In Language and gesture, David McNeill (ed) 141–161. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979 Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Mitchell J., & Alibali, Martha W.
2011 “How gesture use enables intersubjectivity in the classroom.” In Integrating Gestures: The Interdisciplinary Nature of Gesture Gale Stam & Mika Ishino (eds) 257–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Mitchell J., & Kim, Suyeon
2009 “Regulation of teacher elicitations in the mathematics classroom.” Cognition and Instruction 27 (2): 91–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Mitchell J., Eilam, Billie, & Kim, Sueyon
2007 “To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 16 (4): 525–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Leone, Juan
1976 “A view of cognition from a formalist's perspective.” In The developing individual in a changing world: Vol. 1. Historical and cultural issues, K. F. Riegel & J. A. Meacham (eds). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael
2001 “Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning.” Review of Educational Research 71: 365–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1992 “Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srisurichan, Rachaya, Boncoddo, Rebecca, Ledesma, Iasmine, Pier, Elizabeth, Nathan, Mitchell J., & Alibali, Martha W.
2012 “Addressee gesture as a means to foster common ground in the classroom.” Paper presented at the Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies, Lund, Sweden.
Steffe, Leslie P., & Thompson, Patrick W.
2000 “Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31: 191–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S.
1986 Thought and Language. (Alex Kozulin, Translator). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Abrahamson, Dor, Mitchell J. Nathan, Caro Williams-Pierce, Candace Walkington, Erin R. Ottmar, Hortensia Soto & Martha W. Alibali
2020. The Future of Embodied Design for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Frontiers in Education 5 DOI logo
Alibali, Martha W., Mitchell J. Nathan, Rebecca Boncoddo & Elizabeth Pier
2019. Managing common ground in the classroom: teachers use gestures to support students’ contributions to classroom discourse. ZDM 51:2 ► pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Gerofsky, Susan & Kim T Zebehazy
2022. Enhancing mathematical noticing of graphs through movement, voice, and metaphor: An intervention with two students with visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment 40:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Koren, Leon & Tomislav Stipancic
2021. Multimodal Emotion Analysis Based on Acoustic and Linguistic Features of the Voice. In Social Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12774], ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Nathan, Mitchell J. & Martha W. Alibali
2021. An Embodied Theory of Transfer of Mathematical Learning. In Transfer of Learning [Research in Mathematics Education, ], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Nathan, Mitchell J., Amelia Yeo, Rebecca Boncoddo, Autumn B. Hostetter & Martha W. Alibali
2019. Teachers’ attitudes about gesture for learning and instruction. Gesture 18:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Robutti, Ornella, Cristina Sabena, Christina Krause, Carlotta Soldano & Ferdinando Arzarello
2022. Gestures in Mathematics Thinking and Learning. In Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Robutti, Ornella, Cristina Sabena, Christina Krause, Carlotta Soldano & Ferdinando Arzarello
2022. Gestures in Mathematics Thinking and Learning. In Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics, ► pp. 685 ff. DOI logo
Stipancic, Tomislav, Leon Koren, Dinko Korade & Duska Rosenberg
2021. PLEA. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 15 ► pp. 183449092110370 ff. DOI logo
Walkington, Candace, Mitchell J. Nathan, Min Wang & Kelsey Schenck
2022. The Effect of Cognitive Relevance of Directed Actions on Mathematical Reasoning. Cognitive Science 46:9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.