Analogical Modeling

An exemplar-based approach to language

Editors
Royal Skousen | Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Deryle Lonsdale | Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Dilworth B. Parkinson | Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027223623 (Eur) | EUR 125.00
ISBN 9781588113023 (USA) | USD 188.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027296948 | EUR 125.00 | USD 188.00
 
Google Play logo
Analogical Modeling (AM) is an exemplar-based general theory of description that uses both neighbors and non-neighbors (under certain well-defined conditions of homogeneity) to predict language behavior. This book provides a basic introduction to AM, compares the theory with nearest-neighbor approaches, and discusses the most recent advances in the theory, including psycholinguistic evidence, applications to specific languages, the problem of categorization, and how AM relates to alternative approaches of language description (such as instance families, neural nets, connectionism, and optimality theory). The book closes with a thorough examination of the problem of the exponential explosion, an inherent difficulty in AM (and in fact all theories of language description). Quantum computing (based on quantum mechanics with its inherent simultaneity and reversibility) provides a precise and natural solution to the exponential explosion in AM. Finally, an extensive appendix provides three tutorials for running the AM computer program (available online).
[Human Cognitive Processing, 10]  2002.  x, 416 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“It used to be a cliche that language users produce and understand new utterances on the basis of analogies they construct with previous linguistic experiences. A formal articulation of the notion of analogy was, however, lacking for a long time. Skousen's explicit formulation of analogy has triggered a resurgence of interest in analogy-based language processing. This book does a wonderful job of combining a tutorial on analogical modeling with a state-of-the-art overview of the field. It should be read by all who are interested in the interface between language, cognition, and computation.”
“Analogy — one of the most intuitive but elusive processes in language learning and change is here confronted directly, given a formal implementation and shown to be the force behind rule-like
behavior.”
“The latest word on analogical modeling. This volume clearly distinguishes AM from both connectionism and symbolic rule systems.”
“This book succeeds extremely well in providing the reader with a tutorial on analogical modeling (AM) and the state-of-the art of the field, and is especially interesting for computational linguists.”
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

No author info given
2008. Book Review. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 15:2  pp. 212 ff. DOI logo
No author info given
2013. Taxonomies. In Computational Paralinguistics,  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
No author info given
2020. Chapter 4. On the disappearance of August Schleicher in the writings of the Neogrammarians. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128],  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
ARNDT-LAPPE, SABINE
2011. Towards an exemplar-based model of stress in English noun–noun compounds. Journal of Linguistics 47:3  pp. 549 ff. DOI logo
ARNDT-LAPPE, SABINE
2014. Analogy in suffix rivalry: the case of English -ityand -ness. English Language and Linguistics 18:3  pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
Benjamin, D. Paul, Deryle Lonsdale & Damian Lyons
2007. . In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction,  pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Divjak, Dagmar, Petar Milin, Adnane Ez-zizi, Jarosław Józefowski & Christian Adam
2021. What is learned from exposure: an error-driven approach to productivity in language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:1  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Farhy, Yael
2020. Morphological generalization of Hebrew verb classes. The Mental Lexicon 15:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías
2020. Analogy, complexity and predictability in the Russian nominal inflection system. Morphology 30:3  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Heitmeier, Maria, Yu-Ying Chuang & R. Harald Baayen
2021. Modeling Morphology With Linear Discriminative Learning: Considerations and Design Choices. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Johnsen, Lars G. & Christer Johansson
2005. Efficient Modeling of Analogy. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3406],  pp. 694 ff. DOI logo
Milin, Petar, Emmanuel Keuleers & Dušica Đurđević
2011. Allomorphic responses in Serbian pseudo-nouns as a result of analogical learning. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 58:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova
2014. Testing the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4:2  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Nikolaeva, Irina
2020. Constructional analogy and reanalysis in possessive applicatives. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Plag, Ingo
2020. Productivity. In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
Rys, Kathy, Emmanuel Keuleers, Walter Daelemans & Steven Gillis
2017. Chapter 10. Acquisition of phonological variables of a Flemish dialect by children raised in Standard Dutch. In Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation [Studies in Language Variation, 20],  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Rácz, Péter, Viktória Papp & Jennifer Hay
2016. Frequency and Corpora. In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology,  pp. 685 ff. DOI logo
Rácz, Péter, Janet B. Pierrehumbert, Jennifer B. Hay & Viktória Papp
2015. Morphological Emergence. In The Handbook of Language Emergence,  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Räsänen, Sanna H. M., Ben Ambridge & Julian M. Pine
2016. An Elicited‐Production Study of Inflectional Verb Morphology in Child Finnish. Cognitive Science 40:7  pp. 1704 ff. DOI logo
Sandra, Dominiek
2010. Psycholinguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
SIMS-WILLIAMS, HELEN
2022. Token frequency as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics 58:3  pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Skousen, Royal
2012. Analogical Models. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning,  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Strik, Oscar
2014. Explaining tense marking changes in Swedish verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4:2  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
SÓSKUTHY, MÁRTON
2013. Analogy in the emergence of intrusive-rin English. English Language and Linguistics 17:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Tummers, Jose, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts
2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1:2 DOI logo
UCHIHARA, HIROTO & GREGORIO TIBURCIO CANO
2020. A phonological account of Tlapanec (Mè’phàà) tonal alternation. Journal of Linguistics 56:4  pp. 807 ff. DOI logo
van den Bosch, Antal & Walter Daelemans
2013. Implicit Schemata and Categories in Memory-based Language Processing. Language and Speech 56:3  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Versloot, Arjen P. & Eric Hoekstra
2019. Blocking as a Function of the Nature of Linguistic Representations: Where Psycholinguistics and Morphology Meet. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation [Studies in Morphology, 5],  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2002028283 | Marc record