Genitives and proper names in constructional blends

Cited by 8 other publications

Dancygier, Barbara

2022. Experiential viewpoint, simile and dynamicity in discourse. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 205 ff.

Fontaine, Lise

2020. A textual perspective on referential metonymy. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :70 ► pp. 199 ff.

Golubeva, Tatiana

2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff.

Kang, Ji-in & Iksoo Kwon

2023. The COVID-19 pandemic and changing meanings of flatten the curve . Review of Cognitive Linguistics

Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther

2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff.

van Dongen, Noah, Matteo Colombo, Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger

2021. Intuitions About the Reference of Proper Names: a Meta-Analysis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12:4 ► pp. 745 ff.

Yue, Ming & Yi Zhang

2023. Semantic Integration in It-Clefts: A Multifactorial Exploration of Agreement Variability in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4 ► pp. 375 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Semantic Plurality [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 349],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.