Part of
New Directions in Cognitive LinguisticsEdited by Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel
[Human Cognitive Processing 24] 2009
► pp. 161–181
Edited by Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel
[Human Cognitive Processing 24] 2009
► pp. 161–181
Genitives and proper names in constructional blends
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Golubeva, Tatiana
2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political
discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff. 
Kang, Ji-in & Iksoo Kwon
2023. The COVID-19 pandemic and changing meanings of flatten the curve
. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Yue, Ming & Yi Zhang
2023. Semantic Integration in It-Clefts: A Multifactorial Exploration of Agreement Variability in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4 ► pp. 375 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2022. Experiential viewpoint, simile and dynamicity in discourse. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 205 ff.
van Dongen, Noah, Matteo Colombo, Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger
2021. Intuitions About the Reference of Proper Names: a Meta-Analysis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12:4 ► pp. 745 ff.
Fontaine, Lise
2020. A textual perspective on referential metonymy. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :70 ► pp. 199 ff.
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.