Part of
Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real WorldEdited by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan and Lynne Cameron
[Human Cognitive Processing 26] 2010
► pp. 165–184
Edited by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan and Lynne Cameron
[Human Cognitive Processing 26] 2010
► pp. 165–184
9. Pragglejaz in practice
Finding metaphorically used words in natural discourse
This paper aims to present the application of a new method for metaphor identification in discourse, the Pragglejaz Metaphor Identification Procedure, in two corpus-linguistic projects. It provides background information to the method and then demonstrates its basic workings by means of three examples. Then some major issues with the method are discussed in more detail: the nature of units of metaphor analysis, the identification of contextual and basic meanings of words in lexical units in discourse, the role of etymology in determining basic meanings, and the role of distinctness as well as similarity required for metaphorical word meaning.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Fromberg, Emma H. E., Conny A. Bakker & David Peck
2024. Conceptualising a Circular Economy—an Enquiry into Circular Economy Conceptual Metaphors. Circular Economy and Sustainability 4:2 ► pp. 827 ff. 
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun & Christian Burgers
2023. MSDIP: A Method for Coding Source Domains in Metaphor Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 38:4 ► pp. 295 ff.
Lancaster, Mason D.
2021. Metaphor Research and the Hebrew Bible. Currents in Biblical Research 19:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Yu, Yating
2021. Metaphorical representations of “leftover women”: between traditional patriarchy and modern egalitarianism. Social Semiotics 31:2 ► pp. 248 ff.
Bogetić, Ksenija, Andrijana Broćić & Katarina Rasulic
2019. Chapter 10. Linguistic metaphor identification in Serbian. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 204 ff.
Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Chapter 1. MIPVU in multiple languages. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 2 ff.
Pasma, Tryntje
2019. Chapter 5. Linguistic metaphor identification in Dutch. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 92 ff.
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun
2019. Chapter 4. Linguistic metaphor identification in French. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 70 ff.
DAVID, OANA & TEENIE MATLOCK
2018. Cross-linguistic automated detection of metaphors for poverty and cancer. Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 467 ff.
Shitikov, Pyotr M.
2017. Metaphor “CHRIST IS THE SHEPHERD” in Versions of John’s Gospel. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates 3:3 ► pp. 145 ff.
Dobrić, Nikola & Franzisca Weder
2016. Media conceptualizing illnesses – the case of the flu. Continuum 30:1 ► pp. 126 ff.
Mlynář, Jakub
2016. Stroje, texty, sítě a jiné obrazy: metaforický rozměr sociologie. AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA 2016:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
Bates, Carolina Figueras
2015. “I Am a Waste of Breath, of Space, of Time”. Qualitative Health Research 25:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Castaño, Emilia
2015. Review of Nacey (2013): Metaphor in Learner English. Corpora and Language Learners. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1:1 ► pp. 182 ff.
Döring, Martin, Regine Kollek, Anne Brüninghaus & Imme Petersen
2015. Basic Concepts of Systems Biology as Seen Through Systems Biologists’ Eyes: Metaphorical Imagination and Epistemic Presuppositions. In Contextualizing Systems Biology, ► pp. 27 ff.
Ming, Liu
2015. Scapegoat or manipulated victim? Metaphorical representations of the Sino-US currency dispute in Chinese and American financial news. Text & Talk 35:3
Döring, Martin
2014. Metaphorische Moral in aktuellen biotechnologischen Diskursen. In Methoden der Metaphernforschung und -analyse, ► pp. 215 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.