Article published in:
Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus viewEdited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Human Cognitive Processing 28] 2011
► pp. 103–124
Metonymy and cognitive operations
This chapter begins with a distinction made in Ruiz de Mendoza and Peña (2005) between two broad kinds of cognitive operations: formal and content operations. The former are higher-level processes whose activity is necessary for lower-level processes to take place. The latter are used to make inferences on the basis of cues provided by the linguistic expression and its context. The chapter proposes that metonymy can be broken down into two content operations, domain expansion and domain reduction, the latter of which can be further broken down into other two processes: facetization and zone activation. It then explores how these operations relate to or contrast with other content operations and the way in which they are supported by formal operations.
Keywords: cognitive operation, facetization, metaphor, zone activation
Published online: 24 June 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],
No author info given
2017.
In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2],
No author info given
2019.
In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2014. Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.
In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],
► pp. 201 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 152 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Review of Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Galera Masegosa (2014): Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 341 ff.
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer & Carmen Luján-García
2017. Anglicisms and word axiology in homosexual language.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 304 ff.
Galera Masegosa, Alicia
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Godioli, Alberto & Ana Pedrazzini
2019. Falling stars and sinking ships: Framing and metaphor in cartoons about Brexit.
Journal of European Studies 49:3-4 ► pp. 302 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2020.
In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],
► pp. 152 ff.
Herrero Ruiz, Javier
2019. Metaphor and metonymy in jokes.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 650 ff.
Iza Ervitia, Aneider
2012. RESEMBLANCE OPERATIONS AND CONCEPTUAL COMPLEXY IN ANIMAL METAPHORS.
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 7:1
Jodlowiec, Maria & Agnieszka Piskorska
2020.
In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8],
► pp. 45 ff.
Jodłowiec, Maria & Agnieszka Piskorska
2015. Metonymy revisited: Towards a new relevance-theoretic account.
Intercultural Pragmatics 12:2
Kuczok, Marcin
2016.
In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54],
► pp. 193 ff.
Kuczok, Marcin
2020. The Interplay of Metaphor and Metonymy in Christian Symbols.
Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 236 ff.
Miró-Sastre, Ignasi
2018. Combining Metaphors: From Metaphoric Amalgams to Binary Systems.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Moreno Lara, María Ángeles
2014. Representaciones multimodales de metáforas y metonimias en las etiquetas de vino de la D.O. ca. Rioja.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 454 ff.
PARK, CHONGWON & DANIEL TURNER
2017. When Richard met CG: reference-point and English copy-raising.
Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Peña Cervel, María Sandra & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 42 ff.
Rosca, Andreea
2014. How an idea germinates into a projext or the intransitive resultative construction with Entity-Specific change-of-state verbs.
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 9:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2014.
In Language Processing and Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series, 150],
► pp. 367 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2014. Mapping concepts.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 187 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2017. Conceptual complexes in cognitive modeling.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 299 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020.
In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],
► pp. 469 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Alicia Galera Masegosa
2020.
In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],
► pp. 284 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & María de los Ángeles Gómez González
2014.
In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68],
► pp. 295 ff.
RUIZ DE MENDOZA-IBÁÑEZ, FRANCISCO & ALBA LUZONDO-OYÓN
2016. Figurative and non-figurative motion in the expression of result in English.
Language and Cognition 8:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.