This chapter begins with a distinction made in Ruiz de Mendoza and Peña (2005) between two broad kinds of cognitive operations: formal and content operations. The former are higher-level processes whose activity is necessary for lower-level processes to take place. The latter are used to make inferences on the basis of cues provided by the linguistic expression and its context. The chapter proposes that metonymy can be broken down into two content operations, domain expansion and domain reduction, the latter of which can be further broken down into other two processes: facetization and zone activation. It then explores how these operations relate to or contrast with other content operations and the way in which they are supported by formal operations.
2022. Korean Relative Clauses: Metonymy, Zone Activation, and Reference Point*. Studia Linguistica 76:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Park, Chongwon
2022. Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 355 ff.
Peña Cervel, Ma Sandra
2022. For Better, for Worse, for Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Merism. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & María Asunción Barreras Gómez
2014. How an idea germinates into a projext or the intransitive resultative construction with Entity-Specific change-of-state verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 9:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & María de los Ángeles Gómez González
2023. The Scope of Irony. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.