Part of
Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus viewEdited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Human Cognitive Processing 28] 2011
► pp. 103–124
Edited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Human Cognitive Processing 28] 2011
► pp. 103–124
Metonymy and cognitive operations
This chapter begins with a distinction made in Ruiz de Mendoza and Peña (2005) between two broad kinds of cognitive operations: formal and content operations. The former are higher-level processes whose activity is necessary for lower-level processes to take place. The latter are used to make inferences on the basis of cues provided by the linguistic expression and its context. The chapter proposes that metonymy can be broken down into two content operations, domain expansion and domain reduction, the latter of which can be further broken down into other two processes: facetization and zone activation. It then explores how these operations relate to or contrast with other content operations and the way in which they are supported by formal operations.
Keywords: cognitive operation, facetization, metaphor, zone activation
Cited by (51)
Cited by 51 other publications
Barcelona, Antonio
2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 51 ff. 
Golubeva, Tatiana
2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political
discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Kang, Ji-in & Iksoo Kwon
2023. The COVID-19 pandemic and changing meanings of flatten the curve
. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Kapranov, Oleksandr
2023. Metonymy in Online Discourse on Facebook by Greenpeace Australia Pacific. LANGUAGE: Codification, Competence, Communication 2:9 ► pp. 7 ff.
Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz de
2023. Irony and Cognitive Operations. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 38 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2014. Low-level situational cognitive models within the Lexical Constructional Model and their computational implementation in FunGramKB. In Language Processing and Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series, 150], ► pp. 367 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2014. Mapping concepts. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 187 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2017. Conceptual complexes in cognitive modeling. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 299 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2020. Figurative language. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 469 ff.
Park, Chongwon & Jaehoon Yeon
2023. The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 140 ff.
Bagasheva, Alexandra & Jesús Fernández-Domínguez
2022. Chapter 4. Fact-checking on compound verbs in English. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 69 ff.
Broccias, Cristiano
2022. A Cognitive Grammar approach to ‘metonymy’. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 37 ff.
Cacchiani, Silvia
2022. From proper name to epithet: motivation and change in the fashion industry. Lexis :20
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2022. Euphemism in laxative TV commercials: at the crossroads between politeness and persuasion. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Haddad Haddad, Amal
2022. Image Schemas and Image Schematic Complexes: Enhancing Neural Machine Translation Networks. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13528], ► pp. 105 ff.
Muñoz, Carmen Portero
Park, Chongwon
2022. Korean Relative Clauses: Metonymy, Zone Activation, and Reference Point*. Studia Linguistica 76:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Park, Chongwon
2022. Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 355 ff.
Peña Cervel, Ma Sandra
2022. For Better, for Worse, for Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Merism. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & María Asunción Barreras Gómez
2022. Linguistic and metalinguistic resemblance. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 15 ff.
Snoek, Conor
2022. From ‘clubs’ to ‘clocks’: lexical semantic extensions in Dene languages. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 193 ff.
Galera Masegosa, Alicia
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2020. Metonymy meets coercion. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 152 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2020. Maximizing the explanatory power of constructions in Cognitive Construction Grammar(s). Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 110 ff.
Jodlowiec, Maria & Agnieszka Piskorska
2020. Chapter 2. Metonymic relations – from determinacy to indeterminacy. In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8], ► pp. 45 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Alicia Galera Masegosa
2020. The metonymic exploitation of descriptive, attitudinal, and regulatory scenarios in meaning making. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 284 ff.
Soto Nieto, Almudena
2020. La red polisémica denegro. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 562 ff.
Godioli, Alberto & Ana Pedrazzini
2019. Falling stars and sinking ships: Framing and metaphor in cartoons about Brexit. Journal of European Studies 49:3-4 ► pp. 302 ff.
Herrero Ruiz, Javier
2019. Metaphor and metonymy in jokes. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 650 ff.
Miró-Sastre, Ignasi
2018. Combining Metaphors: From Metaphoric Amalgams to Binary Systems. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer & Carmen Luján-García
2017. Anglicisms and word axiology in homosexual language. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
PARK, CHONGWON & DANIEL TURNER
2017. When Richard met CG: reference-point and English copy-raising. Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Peña Cervel, María Sandra & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
2017. Chapter 2. Construing and constructing hyperbole. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 42 ff.
Kuczok, Marcin
2016. The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in English noun+noun compounds. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 193 ff.
Kuczok, Marcin
2020. The Interplay of Metaphor and Metonymy in Christian Symbols. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 236 ff.
RUIZ DE MENDOZA-IBÁÑEZ, FRANCISCO & ALBA LUZONDO-OYÓN
2016. Figurative and non-figurative motion in the expression of result in English. Language and Cognition 8:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Review of Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Galera Masegosa (2014): Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 341 ff.
Jodłowiec, Maria & Agnieszka Piskorska
2015. Metonymy revisited: Towards a new relevance-theoretic account. Intercultural Pragmatics 12:2
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2014. Metaphors and metonymies for the (conceptualization and expression of the) state of no emotion in English and Greek. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 9. Irony has a metonymic basis. In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 152 ff.
Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 304 ff.
Moreno Lara, María Ángeles
2014. Representaciones multimodales de metáforas y metonimias en las etiquetas de vino de la D.O. ca. Rioja. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 454 ff.
Rosca, Andreea
2014. How an idea germinates into a projext or the intransitive resultative construction with Entity-Specific change-of-state verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 9:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & María de los Ángeles Gómez González
2014. Constructing discourse and discourse constructions. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 295 ff.
Iza Ervitia, Aneider
2012. RESEMBLANCE OPERATIONS AND CONCEPTUAL COMPLEXY IN ANIMAL METAPHORS. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 7:1
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2023. The Scope of Irony. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.