2001. Bibliographie. In Pour une théorie des formes sémantiques, ► pp. 227 ff.
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2006. What can blending do for you?. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 15:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
de Balbian, Ulrich
2017. (Meta-Philosophy) Exploration of and Theorizing about Philosophy. SSRN Electronic Journal
Flegar, Željka & Ivana Moritz
2017. Treasure, Thievery and Mischief: Blending Culture and Negotiating Boundaries in the Worlds of Little People. Libri et Liberi 5:2 ► pp. 357 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Atin
2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.
Garwood, Kim
2013. Metonymy and Plain Language. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 43:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Grujic, Tatjana
2020. Pristupi pojmovnoj metafori. Forum 2:1-2 ► pp. 27 ff.
Maleková, Danica
2017. The comic of the heroes – a case study of the role of humour in reflecting national identity. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [53] ff.
Moritz, Ivana
2017. Sacrificed, Lost or Gave Life for Their Country: Cognitive Analysis of Euphemisms for Death in G.W. Bush and B. Obama’s War Speeches. In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 13], ► pp. 301 ff.
Peña Cervel, Ma Sandra
2022. For Better, for Worse, for Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Merism. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Visetti, Yves-Marie
2004. Language, Space and the Theory of Semantic Forms. In Seeing, Thinking and Knowing [Theory and Decision Library A:, 38], ► pp. 245 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.