Cover not available
Part of
Multilingual Cognition and Language Use: Processing and typological perspectives
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[Human Cognitive Processing 44] 2014
► pp. 121–150

HERE, NEAR, FAR

Spatial conceptualisation and cognition in a cross-linguistic perspective (English vs. Russian)

This chapter explores variation and similarities in the conceptualisation of space in Russian and English on the basis of selected terms of ‘location’ and ‘proximity/distance’. It adopts the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach, which identifies eight semantic universals of space, three of which, HERE, NEAR, FAR, were tested for their realisation in both languages. A semantic analysis of terms denoting ‘here’, ‘near’, ‘not far’, and ‘far’ confirms the presence of the three universal primes in English and Russian, though they differ in how they conceptually carve up the notion of space. The study has implications for research into bilingualism and language acquisition and demonstrates that the NSM formulae can be used experimentally to test spatial conceptualisation and cognition cross-linguistically.

Keywords: Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM), semantic primes, space, universals
Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.44.05gla
References
Apresjan, Jurij
1995  Integral’noe opisanie jazyka i sistemnaja leksikografija [An integrated linguistic description and systematic lexicography] . Vol. 2. Moskva: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul’tury”?.Google Scholar
Blake Huer, Mary
2000 Examining perception of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 16 (3): 180–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boguslavskaja, Olga
2004 Blizko, nedaleko, poblizosti, nepodaleku, nevdaleke, vblizi. In ?J. Apresjan, ed., Novyj ob’’jasnitel’nyj slovar’ sinonimov russkogo jazyka [The New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms], 37–44. Moskva–Wien: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury–Wiener Slawistischer Almanach.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Soonja Choi
2003 Space under construction: Language-specific ­spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow, eds., Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought , 387–427. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bromhead, Helen
2011a The bush in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31: 445–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Ethnogeographical categories in English and Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara. Language Sciences 33 (1): 58–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins English Dictionary
1998 Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Collins Wordbanks
Online. [URL]
Filipovi?, Luna & Kasia Jaszczolt
eds 2012  Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture and cognition . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gladkova, Anna
2010  Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ?mocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki . [Russian cultural semantics: emotions, values, attitudes.] Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2011  Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction . 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka
eds 2002  Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings . Vols. 1 & 2. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1995  Semantics and Cognition . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2003  Foundations of Language . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006 On conceptual semantics. Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (3): 353–358. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Conceptual semantics and natural semantic metalanguage theory have different goals. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (3): 411–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakovleva, Elena
1994  Fragmenty russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vosprijatija) [Fragments of the Russian language world view (models of space, time, and perception)]. Moscow: Gnozis.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko
2007  Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition . ­London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2012 Linguistic manifestations of the space-time (dis)analogy. In L. Filipovi? & K. Jaszczolt, eds., Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, culture and cognition , 191–215. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G.?W???
1987[1678] The analysis of languages. In M. Dascal, ed., Leibniz, Language, Signs and Thought: A collection of essays , 161–165. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2003  Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John
1994 The role of semantic value in lexical comparison: motion and position roots in Yucatec Maya. Linguistics 32: 623–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maljar, Tatiana & Olga Seliverstova
1998  Prostranstvenno-distancionnye predlogi i nare?ija v rus­skom i anglijskom jazykax . [Prepositions and adverbs of space and distance in Russian and English.]München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Bowerman, Melissa, Kita, Sotaro, Haun, Daniel & Levinson, Stephen
2004 Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (3): 108–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PROIP
(1956) – Pravila russkoj orforgrafii i punktuacii [Rules of Russian orthography and punctuation]. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. (Available from [URL])Google Scholar
Pütz, Martin & René Dirven
eds 1996  The Construal of Space in Language and Thought . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russian National Corpus
[URL]
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988  The Semantics of Grammar . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: ­Benjamins. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996  Semantics: Primes and Universals . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007a Theory and empirical findings: A response to Jackendoff. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (3): 399–409.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b NSM Semantics vs. conceptual semantics: Goals and standards ?(A response to Jackendoff). Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (4): 521–530.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Jock, Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka
Forthcoming. “Walking” and “running” in English and German: The cross-linguistic semantics of human locomotion.