Cover not available
Part of
Multilingual Cognition and Language Use: Processing and typological perspectives
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[Human Cognitive Processing 44] 2014
► pp. 151–182

Cognitive maps of landmark orientation

This chapter focuses on the linguistic representation of environmental landmarks and topographical coordinates in two unrelated cultures, Eipo and Dene. It explores the degree to which environmental experience of landmarks and spatial orientation are reflected as cognitive maps. Furthermore, topographical information of the immediate environment is represented as cognitive maps of topographical coordinates. These coordinates constitute a regional-specific gestalt. The data shows the influence and constructive process of environmental landmarks and cultural heritage (e.g. practices, myths) on the shaping of spatial categorization. Landmarks, defined as any kind of cultural-specific environmental reference points (mountains, rivers, houses, trees, or rocks) are used as proximate course-maintaining devices in the encoding of figure-ground asymmetries and they determine detailed topographical cognitive maps of the environment.
Keywords: cultural heritage, environmental experience, figure-ground asymmetries, spatial categorization
Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.44.06thi
References (114)
Axelrod, Melissa. 1993. The Semantics of Time: Aspectual Categorization in Koyukon Athabaskan . Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Semantics of classification in Koyukon Athabaskan. In T. Fernald and P.-R. Platero, eds., The Athabaskan Languages: Perspectives on a Native American Language Family . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beller, Sieghard, Andrea Bender, & Douglas Medin L. 2010. Should anthropology be part of Cognitive Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 4: 342–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum, Paul. 1983. Eipo (West-Neuguinea, Zentrales Hochland) – Bauen einer Gewichtfalle . Göttingen: IWF.Google Scholar
Bodley, John H. 1999. Hunter-gatherers and the colonial encounter. In R.-B. Lee and ?R. Daly, eds., The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers , 465–472. Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil. 1983. Where do cardinal directions come from? Anthropological Linguistics 25��(2): 121–161.Google Scholar
Bußmann, Hadumod. 20084. Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft . Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas and Stephen C. Levinson.2008. Language and landscape: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences 30: 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Laura A. 2000. Object use and object location: The effect of function on spatial relations. In E. van der Zee and U. Nikanne, eds., Cognitive Interfaces: Constraints on Linking Cognitive Information , 94–115. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Using spatial language. In B. Ross ed., Psychology of Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory , 127–161. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Laura A. and Logan, Gordon D. 2001. Using spatial terms to select an object. Memory and Cognition 29: 883–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson-Radvansky, Laura & Darrell Irwin. 1993. Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition 46: 223–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson-Radvansky, Laura & Gabriel A. Radvansky.1996. The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science 7: 56–60. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Robin M. 1976. Chipewyan classificatory verbs. IJAL 42:24–30.Google Scholar
Cook, Eung-Do. 1986. Athapaskan classificatory verbs. Amerindia, Revue d’Ethno-linguistique amérindienne 11: 11–24.Google Scholar
. 2004. A Grammar of Dene Suline (Chipewyan) . Winnepeg & Manitoba: Algonquian and Irquoian Linguistics.Google Scholar
Curtis, Edward S. 1976. The North American Indian. Vol. 18. The Chipewyan. The Western Woods Cree. The Sarsi . New York: Johnson.Google Scholar
Davidson, William L., William L. Elford & Harry Hoijer. 1963. Athapaskan classificatory verbs. In Harry Hoijer et al. (eds.). Studies in the Athapaskan Languages , 30–41. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
De Laguna, Fredericæ. 1990. Tlingit. In W. Suttles, ed., Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 7: Northwest Coast , 203–228. Washington, D.?C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Downs, Roger & David Stea. 1973. Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior . Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Ehrenfels, Christian von. 1890. Über Gestaltqualitäten. Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14: 249–292.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus. 1995. Eipo (West-Neuguinea, Zentrales Hochland)- Bau- und Demonstration von Gewichts- und Schwippgalgenfallen . Göttingen: IWF.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus, Wulf Schiefenhövel, & Volker Heeschen. 1991. Film- und Tonaufnahmen bei den Eipo, Neuguinea. Zur Methodik der Datenerhebung und Auswertung. ?Wissenschaftlicher Film 42: 174–177.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S. and Nancy J. Turner. 1999. Ecological/cosmological knowledge and land management among hunter-gatherers. In R.-B. Lee and R. Daly, eds., The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers , 419–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gladwin, Thomas.1970. East is a Big Bird . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Pliny Earle. 1903. Life and Culture of the Hupa . Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar
. 1905. The Morphology of the Hupa Language . Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H. 1953. Native Astronomy in the Central Carolines . Philadelphia: University Museum.Google Scholar
Heeschen, Volker. 1982. Some systems of spatial deixis in Papuan languages. In J. Weissenborn and W. Klein, eds., Here and There: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration , 81–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Oben und Unten. Die Kategorisierung der Umwelt in den Sprachen Neuguineas. In M. Münzel, ed., Neuguinea. Nutzung und Deutung der Umwelt , 599–618. Frankfurt am Main: Museum für Völkerkunde.Google Scholar
. 1990. Ninye bún. Mythen, Erzählungen, Lieder und Märchen der Eipo (im zentralen Bergland von Irian Jaya (West-Neuguinea), Indonesien) . Beiträge zum interdisziplinären Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. 20. Beitrag zur Schriftenreihe Mensch, Kultur und Umwelt im Zentralen Bergland von West-Neuguinea . Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
. 1992. The position of the Mek languages of Irian Jaya among the Papuan languages: History, typology, and speech. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 148 (3/4): 465–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. An Ethnographic Grammar of the Eipo Language (spoken in the central mountains of Irian Jaya (West New Guinea), Indonesia) . Beiträge zum interdisziplinären Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. 23. Beitrag zur Schriftenreihe Mensch, Kultur und Umwelt im Zentralen Bergland von West-Neuguinea . Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Heeschen, Volker and Wulf Schiefenhövel. 1983. Wörterbuch der Eipo-Sprache. Eipo-Deutsch-Englisch . Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von.1867. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik . Leipzig: Voss.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harry. 1963. Introduction. In C. Osgood, ed., Linguistic Structures of Native America . Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, Vol. 6, 9–29. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. and Franca Agnoli . 1991. The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review 98 (3): 377–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1983. Understanding Micronesian navigation. In D. Gentner and A.-L. Stevens, eds., Mental Models , 191–225. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1996 2 . Cognition in the Wild . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kanizsa, Gaetano. 1979. Organization in Vision. Essay on Gestalt Perception . New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kari, James. 1979. Athabaskan Verb Theme Categories: Athna . Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers, 2. Fairbanks: University of Alaska.Google Scholar
. 2011. A case study in Athna Athabascan geographic knowledge. In D. Mark, A.-G. Turk, N. Burenhult and D. Stea, eds., Landscape in Language: Transdisciplinary Perspectives , 239–260. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Gerd. 1984. Maligdam: Ethnographische Notizen über einen Siedlungsbereich im oberen Eipomek-Tal, zentrales Bergland von Irian Jaya (West-Neuguinea), Indonesien . Beiträge zum interdisziplinären Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft 15. Beitrag zur Schriftenreihe Mensch, Kultur und Umwelt im Zentralen Bergland von West-Neuguinea . Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Koch, Gerd and Wulf Schiefenhövel . 1979. Eipo (West New Guinea, Central Highlands) – Reconstruction of the Sacral Men’s House at Munggona . Göttingen: IWF.Google Scholar
Koffka, Kurt. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology . New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1920. Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand: Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung . Braunschweig: Vieweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1929. Gestalt Psychology . [Psychologische Probleme 1933 dt.]. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael E. 1969. On the Classification in the Athapascan, Eyak, and the Tlingit Verb . Baltimore: Waverly Press, Indiana University.Google Scholar
. 1970a. Eskimo–Aleut . Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1970b. Eyak Dictionary . College, AK: University of Alaska.Google Scholar
. 1970c. Eyak Texts . College, AK: University of Alaska and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Benjamin. 1979. On representing common sense knowledge. In N.-V. Findler, ed., Associative Networks: The Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers , 393–408. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. The “map in the head” metaphor. Environment and Behavior 14: 202–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 1): Theoretical Prerequisites . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff. 1989. Directional systems in Athapaskan and Na-Dene. In E.-D. Cook and K. Rice, eds., Athapaskan Linguistics: Current Perspectives on a language family , 575–622. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenzen, Manuela. 2012. Das Stammhirn und das Hirn des Stammhirnforschers. In Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 189(15.8.2012): 5.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition. Explorations in Cognitive Diversity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & David Wilkins . 2006. Grammars of Space . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1946. Chipewyan. In C. Osgood, ed., Linguistic Structures of Native America . Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, Vol. 6, 398–423. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992a. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language12]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992b. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Joyce. 2000. On a bipartite model of the Athabaskan verb. In T. Fernald and ?P. Platero, eds., The Athabascan Languages , 139–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malotki, Ekkehart. 1983. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Hopi-Raum. Eine sprachwissenschaftliche Analyse der Raumvorstellungen in der Hopi-Sprache . Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mark, David M., Andrew G. Turk, Niclas Burenhult, & David Stea, eds. 2011. Landscape in Language: Transdisciplinary Perspectives . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marr, David. 1982. Vision. A Computational Investigation into Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information . San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Metzger, Wolfgang. 1953. Gesetze des Sehens . Frankfurt am Main: Kramer.Google Scholar
Michel, Thomas. 1983. Interdependenz von Wirtschaft und Umwelt in der Eipo-Kultur von Moknerkon: Bedingungen für Produktion und Reproduktion bei einer Dorfschaft im zentralen Bergland von Irian Jaya (West-Neuguinea), Indonesien . Beiträge zum interdisziplinären Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. 11. Beitrag zur Schriftenreihe Mensch, Kultur und Umwelt im Zentralen Bergland von West-Neuguinea . Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. & Philip N. Johnson-Laird.1976. Language and Perception . Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morice, Adrien G. (Rev. Father) 1890. The Déné languages (considered in themselves and incidentally in their relations to Non-American idioms). Transactions of the Canadian Institute , Vol. 1, 170–212.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference . Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean & Bärbel Inhelder . 1956. The Child’s Conception of Space . New York: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Portugali, Juval, ed. 1996. The Construction of Cognitive Maps . Dordrecht: Kluwer. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. 2009. The Carrier Language: A Brief Introduction . Prince George, British Columbia: College of New Caledonia Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A Grammar of Slave . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally. 1997. Giving and taking in Chipewyan: The semantics of THING-marking classificatory verbs. In J. Newman, ed., The Linguistics of Giving [Typological Studies in Language, 36], 97–134. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2002. Posture and existence predicates in Dene Suline (Chipewyan): Lexical and semantic density as a function of the ‘stand’/‘sit’/‘lie’ continuum. In J. Newman, ed., The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying [Typological Studies in Language, 51], 61–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally & Valerie Wood . 1996. Postpositions and lexicalization patterns in the Chipewyan verb . Paper presented at the annual Athapaskan Languages Conference, University of Alberta, 15June1996.
Riesenberg, Saul H. 1972. The organisation of navigational knowledge on Puluwat. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 91(1): 19–56.Google Scholar
Röll, Werner & Gerd R. Zimmermann. 1979. Untersuchungen zur Bevölkerungs-, Siedlungs- und Agrarstruktur im zentralen Bergland von Irian-Jaya (West-Neuguinea), Indonesien . Beiträge zum interdisziplinären Schwerpunktprogramm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. 1. Beitrag zur Schriftenreihe Mensch, Kultur und Umwelt im Zentralen Bergland von West-Neuguinea . Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edgar. 1921. Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren . Kobenhavn: Gyldendalske.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1915. The Na-Dene languages, a preliminary report. American Anthropology 17 (3): 534–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarfert, Ernst. 1911. Zur Kenntnis der Schiffahrtskunde der Karoliner. Korrespondenzblatt der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie, und Urgeschichte 42: 131–136.Google Scholar
Schiefenhövel, Wulf. 1976. Die Eipo-Leute des Berglands von Indonesisch-Neuguinea: Kurzer Überblick über den Lebensraum und seine Menschen. Einführung zu den Eipo-Filmen des Humanethologischen Filmarchivs der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Homo 26 (4): 263–275.Google Scholar
. 1979. The Eipo. Members of the Mek group in the highlands of Irian Jaya. Irian, Bulletin of Irian Jaya Development 7 (2): 47–67.Google Scholar
. 1991. Die Mek und ihre Nachbarn. Internationale Konferenz über Neuguinea-Forschungen. Zeitschrift Wissenschaft und Fortschritt 1 (91): 21–25.Google Scholar
Siegel, Alexander W. & Sheldon H. White.1975. The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H.-W. Reese, ed., Advances in Child Development and Behavior , 10–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, James G.?E???.1981. Chipewyan. In J. Helm, ed., Subarctic. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 6 , 271–284. Washington: Smithonian Institution.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, William C., ed., 2006. Environment, Origins, and Population. Handbook of North American Indians . Vol. 3. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria. 1993. The Grammar of Space . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1978. Figure and Ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik, eds., Universals of Human Language , 627–649. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. How language structures space. In H. Pick and L. Acredolo, eds., Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application , 225–282. New York: Plenum Press. ? DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics, Vols. 1 & 2 . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thiering, Martin. 2006. Topological relations in an Athapaskan language. PETL: Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics , 1.University of Alberta: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2009a. Language loss in spatial semantics: Dene Suliné. In J.-N. Stanford and D.-R. Preston, eds., Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages , 485–516. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Linguistic categorization of topological spatial relations. TOPOI: Towards a Historical Epistemology of Space . Preprint 373. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institute for the History of Science ([URL]).Google Scholar
. 2010. Intralingual variation of spatial concepts in an Athapaskan language. In Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation in its Structural, Conceptual and Cultural Dimensions . 34th International LAUD Symposium, Landau/Pfalz, March15–18, 92–123.
. 2011. Figure-ground reversals in language. Gestalt Theory Vol. 33 (3/4): 245–276.Google Scholar
. 2012. Topographical Coordinates and Spatial Language. Proceedings of the 35th International LAUD Symposium Cognitive Psycholinguistics: Bilingualism, Cognition and Communication . 35th International LAUD Symposium, Landau/Pfalz, March 26–29 March, 1–58.
. 2013. Degree of specificity in spatial semantics. In M. Reif, J. Robinson and ?M. Pütz, eds., Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Variation in Language and Language Use. Linguistic, Socio-Cultural and Cognitive Perspectives , 367–420. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. in press.Implicit knowledge structures as mental models in common sense geography. In K. Geus & M. Thiering, eds., Features of Common Sense Geography: Implicit Knowledge Structures in Ancient Geographical Texts . Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
Thiering, Martin & Wulf Schiefenhövel . Forthcoming. Representations of spaces in Eipo and Dene Chipewyan: Spatial language and environment. In M. Schemmel, ed., Spatial Thinking and External Representation: Towards a Historical Epistemology of Space . Max Planck Institute for the History of Sciences, Berlin: MPIWG Edition Open Access.
Tolman, Edward C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55: 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, Max. 1923. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychologische Forschung . Vol. 4, 301–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1925. Über Gestalttheorie . Vortrag vor der Kant-Gesellschaft, Berlin am 17. Dezember 1924. Erlangen: Verlag der Philosophischen Akademie.Google Scholar
Wurm, Stephen A. 1982. Papuan Languages of Oceania . Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Young, Robert W. & William Morgan . 1980. The Navajo Language: A Grammar and Colloquial Dictionary . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. Analytical Lexicon of Navajo . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan. 2003. Holistic spatial semantics of Thai. In E.-H. Casad and G.-B. Palmer, eds., Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European Languages , 305–336. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , 318–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar