Fictive Interaction
The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse
| University of Groningen
Language is intimately related to interaction. The question arises: Is the structure of interaction somehow mirrored in language structure and use? This book suggests a positive answer to this question by examining the ubiquitous phenomenon of fictive interaction, in which non-genuine conversational turns appear in discourse, even within clauses, phrases, and lexical items (e.g. “Not happy? Money back! guarantee”). The book is based on a collection of hundreds of examples of fictive interaction at all grammatical levels from a wide variety of spoken, written, and signed languages, and from many different discourse genres. Special attention is devoted to the strategic use of fictive interaction in legal argumentation, with a focus on high-profile criminal trials. Both trial lawyers and lay jurors often present material evidence or murder victims as speaking, and express emotions and intentions in conversational terms. The book thus establishes the role of the conversational turn—rather than the sentence—as the basic unit of language, and the role of conversation as a frame that structures cognition, discourse, and grammar.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 47] 2014. xiv, 243 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
|
Tables and figures
|
xi–xii
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
xiii–xiv
|
|
Chapter 1. Introduction: Language, interaction, and cognition
|
1–26
|
|
Chapter 2. Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in discourse and grammar
|
29–58
|
|
Chapter 3. Direct speech compounds: On the dialogue-morphology interface
|
59–82
|
|
Chapter 4. From talk-in-interaction to grammar: A cross-linguistic study of fictive interaction
|
83–112
|
|
Chapter 5. It’s like, why fictive interaction? Multifunctional direct speech in a jury deliberation
|
115–140
|
|
Chapter 6. The trial as fictive trialogue: Fictive interaction imagery in legal argumentation
|
141–168
|
|
Chapter 7. Triadic questions in court: Searching for answers about legal “truth”
|
169–188
|
|
Chapter 8. Concluding remarks
|
189–196
|
|
References
|
197–218
|
|
Appendix 1: Sources for examples in Parts I and II
|
219–228
|
|
Appendix 2: Codes for ethnographic data in Part II
|
229–230
|
|
Appendix 3: Abbreviations for interlinear glosses
|
231–232
|
|
Author index
|
233–236
|
|
Language index
|
237–238
|
|
Subject index
|
239–244
|
“In this incisive and highly readable study, Pascual makes a cogent and thorough case for the central status of the conversation frame in human understanding. She explores not only "the conversational turn" as the basic unit of language, but also the ways in which imaginative mental webs can create new, emergent meaning—fictive interactions, especially fictive conversations. She shows how fictive conversations populate our lives.”
Mark Turner, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
“There's nothing fictive about Fictive Interaction. The book is factual and logical. It walks the reader down a path of well-reasoned explanations for how language works, across a wide range of interactive domains, including legal argumentation. Innovative and insightful!”
Teenie Matlock, University of California, MercedN
“People talk with each other—that’s what language is for. In this fascinating and deeply researched book Esther Pascual shows that the structures of conversational interaction leave their traces all through the grammars and lexicons of languages. We talk not only to exchange information, but also to create fictive situations in which talk is used to subtly convey intentions, evaluations, and more. Pascual explores linguistic structures of fictive interaction across a wide range of languages and contexts, all the way from the language of everyday life to murder trials, and comparing oral and written languages. In the process she proposes bold hypotheses and lays the groundwork for a linguistics based on the conversational mind, replacing the “sentence” with the “conversational turn.” A rich and important book.”
Dan I. Slobin, University of California, Berkeley
“Esther Pascual’s book is one of the most significant and original contributions to language sciences in recent times. Theoretically, she achieves a profound synthesis of socio-interactional and cognitive approaches to language. Methodologically, she places comparative, crosslinguistic ethnographic analysis of conversational interaction at the heart of the linguistic enterprise. Not only linguists, but psychologists in the dialogical and dialectical tradition stretching back to Bakhtin, Vološinov and Vygotsky, will find rich material and brilliant insights in what is sure to become a classic work.”
Chris Sinha, Hunan University, China, and Phonetics at Lund University, Sweden
“This book, with its well-structured organization, approachable writing style, well-founded argumentation and profound implications, is a particularly timely contribution to Cognitive Linguistics research. Its most outstanding contribution is that it opens up a whole new research line.”
Mingjian Xiang, Zhejiang University, China, in Cognitive Linguistics 2015; 26(4): 709–716
“In sum, Fictive Interaction is a “must-read book.” FI can no longer be written off as a dialectal or marginal phenomenon but rather must be included and integrated in theories of syntax, semantics, and other areas of linguistic inquiry.”
Karen Sullivan, University of Queensland, in Cognitive Semiotics 2015; 8(1): 93–96
References
The requested document (/db/data/shared.benjamins.com/references/hcp/hcp.47.refs.xml) was not foundCited by
Cited by 44 other publications
No author info given
2020.
In Understanding Conversational Joking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 310],
Alekseenko, Natalia Vadimovna
2021. Fictive Interaction Phenomenon in Social Advertising Discourse.
Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki :6 ► pp. 1866 ff.
Birchall, Joshua
2018. Historical change in reported speech constructions in the Chapacuran family.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Brandt, Line & Esther Pascual
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 303 ff.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 113 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2021. Fictive Deixis, Direct Discourse, and Viewpoint Networks.
Frontiers in Communication 6
Demeter, Gusztav
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 151 ff.
Dornelas, Aline & Esther Pascual
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 343 ff.
FitzGerald, William & Todd Oakley
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 131 ff.
Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley
2020. “Hi, Mr. President!”.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 180 ff.
Gentens, Caroline, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck & An Van linden
2019. Irregular perspective shifts and perspective
persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Geurts, Bart
2021. First saying, then believing: The pragmatic roots of folk psychology.
Mind & Language 36:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
Harding, Jennifer R
2021. Epistolary cognition: The family letters of Rosalie Calvert.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Igl, Natalia
2019.
In Experiencing Fictional Worlds [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 32],
► pp. 97 ff.
Jarque Moyano, Maria Josep
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 171 ff.
Królak, Emilia
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 235 ff.
Leuschner, Torsten
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 193 ff.
Lou, Adrian
2017. Multimodal simile.
English Text Construction 10:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
Matos Rocha, Luiz Fernando & Pablo Arantes
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 215 ff.
Mustajoki, Arto, Tatiana Sherstinova & Ulla Tuomarla
2018.
In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],
► pp. 189 ff.
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal & Mark Turner
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 45 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2016. ‘Quo Vadimus?’ from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective.
Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Pascual, Esther, Aline Dornelas & Todd Oakley
2017. When “Goal!” means ‘soccer’.
Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Pascual, Esther & Emilia Królak
2018. The ‘listen to characters thinking’ novel.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 399 ff.
Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 3 ff.
QIU, SIQI & YIRUI LIANG
2018. Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2016. Pp. 384. ISBN 978-90-272-4671-4 (Hb), 978-90-272-6650-7 (E-book).
Language and Cognition 10:3 ► pp. 544 ff.
Sandler, Sergeiy
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 23 ff.
Sandler, Sergeiy & Esther Pascual
2019. In the beginning there was conversation.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Spronck, Stef
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 255 ff.
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
2021. In a Manner of Speaking: How Reported Speech May Have Shaped Grammar.
Frontiers in Communication 6
Sullivan, Karen
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 87 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021.
In Language and Social Minds,
van der Voort, Hein
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 277 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2017.
Isabelle Buchstaller , Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. Pp. xviii +306. ISBN 9780470657188..
English Language and Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 184 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2019. Changing perspectives.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:2 ► pp. 170 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2021. Creative constructs, constructions, and frames in Internet discourse.
Constructions and Frames 13:1 ► pp. 160 ff.
Versluis, Christine & Lou-Ann Kleppa
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 323 ff.
Wilson, Anna
2020. It’s Time to Do News Again.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
Xiang, Mingjian
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 63 ff.
Xiang, Mingjian & Bosen Ma
2020.
In Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 13],
► pp. 249 ff.
Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual
2016. Debate with zhuangzi.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 26:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
Zhang, Yi
2021. Metaphor in Science Communication: With Special Reference to Jade Rabbit of the Moon Rover.
Science Communication 43:6 ► pp. 719 ff.
Zhao, Yushan
2018. E. Pascual & S. Sandler (Eds.). The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive
interaction
.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 537 ff.
ZIMA, ELISABETH & GEERT BRÔNE
2015. Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue.
Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General