Cover not available
Part of
Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 23–54

Toward an integrated view of structure, processing, and discourse

Research in Cognitive Grammar divides into two broad phases. The first phase provided an integrated account of lexicon, morphology, and syntax as inherently meaningful structures; it offered a radical alternative to the generative paradigm based on modularity, constituency, and the autonomy of syntax. The current phase aims at a broader synthesis subsuming structure, processing, and discourse. Linguistic structures are never self-contained, but draw upon a substrate of indefinite extent, encompassing the speech situation, the context, background knowledge, and the ongoing discourse. The substrate includes the speaker-hearer interaction, which is part of an expression’s meaning even when left implicit. Recognition of the substrate allows a straightforward treatment of phenomena that are problematic when expressions are analyzed in isolation.

Keywords: attention, complementation, constituency, discourse, interaction, language processing, prosody, seriality, structure, substrate, symbolic assembly
Published online: 4 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.54.02lan
References
Austin, J.L
1962 How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P
2007 Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language, 31, 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M
1968 The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M
2001 The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 97–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G
1985 Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A
1983 The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I
1976 Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 391–428.Google Scholar
Ibbotson, P., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M
2013 The attention-grammar interface: Eye-gaze cues structural choice in children and adults. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 457–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, T
1995 Deixis from a cognitive point of view. In E. Contini-Morava & B. Sussman Goldberg (Eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory (245–270). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1990 Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1997 Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001a Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b Topic, subject, and possessor. In H. Gram Simonsen & R. Theil Endresen (Eds.), A cognitive approach to the verb: Morphological and constructional perspectives (11–48). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2002 Deixis and subjectivity. In F. Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (1–28). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Elliptic coordination. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 555–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In L. Visapää, J. Kalliokoski, & H. Sorva (Eds.), Contexts of subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives (17–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C.N
1997 On zero anaphora. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type dedicated to T. Givón (275–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J.R
1970 On declarative sentences. In R.A. Jacobs & P.S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (222–272). Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R
1969 Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L
1988 The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (165–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.A
2002 ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26, 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hoek, K
1995 Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language, 71, 310–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Backwards anaphora as a constructional category. Functions of Language, 4, 47–82.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Kochańska, Agata
2021. A grammatical construction in the service of interpersonal distance regulation. The case of the Polish directive infinitive construction. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016. Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Langacker, Ronald W.
2020. Trees, assemblies, chains, and windows. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Möttönen, Tapani
2019. The normative basis of construal. In Normativity in Language and Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209], ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2022. Review of Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (2021). New York and London: Routledge, pp. 772. Prace Językoznawcze 24:1 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Waliński, Jacek Tadeusz
2022. Trees, assemblies, chains, and windows. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122], ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Hongwei
2020. Book review: Christopher Hart (ed.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Text and Discourse: From Poetics to Politics. Discourse Studies 22:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Fictive questions in the Zhuangzi [Figurative Thought and Language, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.