Part of
Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 121142
References
Akmajian, A.
1984Sentence types and the form–function fit. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, R.
1989Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bally, C.
1905Précis de stylistique. Genève: Eggimann.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., & Eythórsson, T.
2012Reconstructing syntax: Construction grammar and the comparative method. In H.C. Boas & I.A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (257–308). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D.
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M.
1996Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M.F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (383–436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
1990Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000Lexical and grammatical meaning. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (257–263). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cruse, D.A.
1986Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drożdż, G.
2012Conceptualizing the present through construal aspects: The case of the English temporal constructions. In L. Filipović & K.M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures (305–328). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E.
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenough, J.B., Kittredge, G.L., Howard, A.A., & D’Ooge, B.L.
(1903) Allen and Greenough’s new Latin grammar for schools and colleges. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Michaelis, L.A.
2012Constructional meaning and compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Vol. 3 (2271–2296). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
1990What, me worry? – Mad Magazine sentences revisited. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 215–228.
Langacker, R.W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legallois, D.
2012From grammaticalization to expressive constructions. In M. Bouveret & D. Legallois (Eds.), Constructions in French [Constructional Approaches to Language 13] (257–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1982Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?. In R.J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (101–124). Chichester & New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
1990Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L.A.
2010Sign-based construction grammar. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (155–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, D.G.
1986Grammatical morphemes and conceptual structure in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 423–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.
1989Language has a heart. Text, 9, 7–25.Google Scholar
Putnam, H.
1991Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Słoń, A.
2007The ‘impersonal’ impersonal construction in Polish: A cognitive grammar analysis. In D. Divjak & A. Kochańska (Eds.), Cognitive paths into the slavic domain (257–290). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szcześniak, K.
2013You can’t cry your way to candy: Motion events and paths in the x’s way construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24 (1), 159–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1978The relation of grammar to cognition. In D. Waltz (Ed.), Proceedings of TINLAP-2 (14–24). Urbana: University of Illinois Coordinated Science Laboratory.Google Scholar
2011Cognitive Semantics: An overview. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Vol. 1 (622–642). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R.
1995Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K.
2003Lenneberg’s Dream: Learning, normal language development, and a specific language impairment. In Y. Levy & J.C. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language Competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment (11–62). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90(1/2), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar