Article published in:
The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction
Edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler
[Human Cognitive Processing 55] 2016
► pp. 87109
References

References

Baynham, M.
(1996) Direct speech: What’s it doing in non-narrative discourse? Journal of Pragmatics, 25(1), 61–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F.
(2010) Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Footing. In Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, Y.
(1995) Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua, 95, 223–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascual, E.
(2002) Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
(2008) Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings. In T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 79–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salah, A.A., Salah, A.A., Buter, B., Dijkshoorn, N., Modolo, D., Nguyen, Q., van Noort, S., & van de Poel, B.
(2012) DeviantART in spotlight: A network of artists. Leonardo, 45(5), 486–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salah, A.A., & Salah, A.A.
(2013) Flow of innovation in deviantArt: Following artists on an online social network site. Mind & Society, 12, 137–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K.
(2006) How does art ‘speak’ and what does it ‘say’: Conceptual metaphor theory as a tool for understanding the artistic process. In D.E. Boyes & F.B. Cogan (Eds.), Thought tools for a new generation: Essays on thought, ideas, and the power of expression (pp. 81–89). Eugene, OR: Robert D. Clark Honors College.Google Scholar
(2009) The Languages of Art: How representational and abstract painters conceptualize their work in terms of language. Poetics Today, 30(3), 517–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1986) Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narratives. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Hearing voices in conversation, fiction, and mixed genres. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 89–113). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
(1989) Talking voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2014.  In Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47], Crossref logo
Pascual, Esther & Emilia Królak
2018. The ‘listen to characters thinking’ novel. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 399 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.