Chapter published in:
Studies in Figurative Thought and Language
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 152175
References

References

Athanasiadou, A., & Dirven, R.
1996Typology of if-clauses. In E. H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (609–654). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality. In A. Athanasiadou, & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (61–96). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Pragmatic conditionals. In A. Foolen, & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (1–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A.
2000On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective [Topics in English Linguistics 30] (31–58). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly “irregular” grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation [Cognitive Linguistics Research 28] (357–374). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barnden, J.
2010Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M.
2007Metonymy in grammar: Towards motivating extensions of grammatical categories and constructions. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University Faculty of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
2003Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther, & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 113] (241–266). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The (non-)metonymic use of place names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25] (229–257). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M.
2004Predicate adjectives and grammatical-relational polysemy: The role of metonymic processes in motivating cross-linguistic differences. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation [Cognitive Linguistic Research 28] (321–355). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
1993The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B.
1998Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
2005Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Athanasiadou, A.
2005If and its near synonyms. In A. J. Schuth, K. Horner, & J. J. Weber (Eds), Life in language (97–120). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Pörings, R.
(Eds) 2003Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
2002The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
1991Grammaticalization. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. C.
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses Z., & Radden, & G.
1998Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9: 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1999Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29, 77–103.Google Scholar
2009Metonymic grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25] (45–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
2005The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza, & M. S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction [Cognitive Linguistics Research 32] (353–386). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011Taking stock of figurative language and grammar: Results and prospects. metaphorik.de 21, 21–45.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
(Eds.) 1999Metonymy in language and thought. [Human Cognitive Processing 4]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
2011Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. In: K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon [Human Cognitive Processing 27] (1–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
1999The POTENTIALITY FOR ACTUALITY metonymy in English and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought [Human Cognitive Processing 4] (333–359). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. metaphorik.de 6: 91–116.Google Scholar
2009aIntroduction. On figuration in grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25] (1–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bAspect and metonymy in the French passé simple. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25] (177–195). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
2002How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast [Cognitive Linguistics Research 20] (407–437). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005The ubiquity of metonymy. In: J. L. Otal Campo, I. Navarro I Ferrando, & B. Bellés Fortuño (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (11–28). Castelló: Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
2000The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads [Topics in English Linguistics 30] (109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view [Human Cognitive Processing 28] (103–123). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A.
2014Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective [Human Cognitive Processing 45]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Mairal-Usón, R.
2007High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning Construction (33–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L.
2001Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language and Communication, 21, 321–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
2007Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: a methodological analysis of theory and research [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 20]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010When is metaphor deliberate? In N.-L. C. Johannesson, Alm-Arvius, & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the Stockholm 2008 metaphor festival. Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.Google Scholar
2011Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5 (1–2), 179–197.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K.
2013Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (318–333). The University of Chicago Press. Chicago & London.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1996Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom et al., (Eds.), Language and Space (211–276). Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar