Chapter published in:
Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Alba Luzondo Oyón and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Human Cognitive Processing 58] 2017
► pp. 77107


Anderson, J. M.
2003On the structure of names. Folia Linguistica, 37, 347–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004On the grammatical status of names. Language, 80(3), 435–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M.
2007The grammar of names. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A.
2003Names: A metonymic ‘return ticket’ in five languages. Jezikoslovlje, 4(1), 11–41.Google Scholar
2004Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly ‘irregular’ grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (357–374). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007The multi-level role of metonymy in grammar and discourse: A case study. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy: Proceedings of the international conference “Perspectives on metonymy,” held in Łódź, Poland, May 6–7, 2005 (103–131). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009Partitive restrictive modification of names in English: arguments for their metonymic motivation. Quaderns de filología. Estudis lingüístics, 14, 33–56.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
2007When Zidane is not simply Zidane, and Bill Gates is not just Bill Gates: Or, Some thoughts on online construction of metaphtonymic meanings of proper names. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (125–142.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Metonymies we (don’t) translate by: The case of complex metonymies. Argumentum, 10, 232–247.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., Brdar-Szabó, R., Gradečak-Erdeljić, T., & Buljan, G.
2001Predicative adjectives in some Germanic and Slavic languages: On the role of metonymy in extending grammatical constructions. Suvremena lingvistika, 27(1–2), 35–57.Google Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R.
2009Metonymy in indirect directives: Stand-alone conditionals in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (323–336). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, C.
2001Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences, 23(4–5), 551–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colman, F.
2008Names, derivational morphology, and Old English gender. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 44, 29–52.Google Scholar
Colman, F., & Anderson, J.
2004On metonymy as word-formation: With special reference to Old English. English Studies, 85(6), 547–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curme, G. O.
1931A grammar of the English language. Vol. 3: Syntax. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
Filipović, R.
1992Metonimija u funkciji formiranja anglicizama u europskim jezicima. Suvremena Lingvistika, 18(2), 63–72.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. S.
1997A new dictionary of eponyms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garfield, E.
1983What’s in a name? The eponymic route to immortality. Current Contents, 47, 5–16.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
1989Principles of monolingual lexicography. In F. J. Hausmann, O. Reichmann, H. E. Wiegand, & L. Zgusta (Eds.), Wörterbücher. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Lexikographie – Dictionaries. An international encyclopedia of lexicography – Dictionnaires. Encyclopédie internationale de lexicographie, 1 (287–296.). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T.
2009Iconicity of the verbal expression – The case of “light” verbs in English. In M. Brdar, M. Omazić, & V. Pavičić Takač (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to English: Fundamental, methodological, interdisciplinary and applied aspects (3–26). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T., & Brdar, M.
2012Constructional meaning of verbo-nominal constructions in English and Croatian. Suvremena lingvistika, 38(1): 29–46.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
2007Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (77–98). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imamović, A.
2006Limitations on metonymic uses of -ion nominalizations. Jezikoslovlje, 7(1–2), 45–65.Google Scholar
2009Motivation for different metonymic readings of – ion nominalizations. In M. Brdar, M. Omazić, & V. Pavičić Takač (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to English: Fundamental, methodological, interdisciplinary and applied aspects (69–96). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1924The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
1942A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part VI: Morhology. London & Copenhagen: George Allen & Unwin, & Ejner Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G.
2004Peut-on sauver un sens de denomination pour les noms propres? Functions of Language, 11(1), 115–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
1998Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
2005Construction Grammars: cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & M. S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (101–162). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langendonck, W. van
2005Proprial names and proprial lemmas. In E. Brylla, & M. Wahlberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st international congress of onomastic sciences, Uppsala 19–24 August 2002 (315–323). Uppsala: Språk-och Folkminnesinstitutet.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A.
1992A theory of vocabulary structure: Retrospectives and prospectives. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistics evolution (243–256). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Proper names: Linguistic aspects. In E. K. Brown, & J. Miller (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of grammatical categories (311–313). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lipka, L.
2006Naming Units (NUs), Observational Linguistics and reference as a speech act, or, What’s in a name. SKASE journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3(3), 30–39.Google Scholar
Macpherson, G.
(Ed.) 1999Black’s medical dictionary. London: Cooper.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V.
1961Obsahový rozbor současné angličtiny na základĕ obecnĕ lingvistickém [A functional analysis of contemporary English on a General linguistic basis]. Prague: Nakladatelství československé akademie věd.Google Scholar
1976Über die Notwendigkeit der Stabilität in der Literatursprache. In J. Scharnhorst, & E. Ising (Eds.), Grundlagen der Sprachkultur – Beiträge der Prager Linguistik zur Sprachtheorie und Sprachpflege. Teil 1 (86–102). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Pang, K.-y. S.
2010Eponymy and life-narratives: The effect of foregrounding on proper names. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5): 1321–1349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
1999Introduction. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (1–14). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulgram, E.
1954Theory of names. Berkeley, California: American Name Society.Google Scholar
Rapp, D. N., & Gerrig, R. J.
1999Eponymous verb phrases and ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 612–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
2014Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R.
2007High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, Th. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (33–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C.
(Eds.) 1989The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In L. A. Sutton, Ch. Johnson, & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
2008aThe grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (23–45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008b‘All that he endeavoured to prove was …’: on the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogual contexts. In R. Kempson, & R. Cooper (Eds.), Language change and evolution (143–177). London: Kings College Publications.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: how do they intersect? In E. C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (19–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G.
2008Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: evidence from the history of a Composite Predicate Construction in the history of English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (33–67). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S.
1962Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vachek, J.
1961Some less familiar aspects of the analytical trend in English. Brno Studies in English, 3, 31–44.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, H.
2001La traduction des éponymes médicaux banalisés de langue anglaise. Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’s Journal, 46(1), 82–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4  pp. 266 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.