Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 61–94

Chapter 2
Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English

Verbal and non-verbal cognition across languages

| CNRS & University of Paris 8
| University of Mannheim
| University of Lille 3
| University of Cambridge
| CNRS & University of Paris 8
Language-specific properties influence motion expression (Slobin 2004; Talmy 2000), but it is still debated whether they also influence non-verbal spatial cognition. We compare how English and French speakers perform three tasks involving motion events: non-verbal categorization based on cartoons during a dual task (articulatory suppression); verbal categorization involving target sentences; and descriptions of motion events. Descriptions show more manner expression in English and variation in both groups as a function of event properties. However, both groups frequently choose Path as categorization criterion, particularly in verbal categorization, but language effects do show that English speakers are more sensitive to event properties. Thus, typology has a strong impact on verbal cognition but also a partial influence on non-verbal cognition that must be taken into account in future research on the relation between language and thought.
Keywords: categorization, lexicalization, Manner (of motion), Path (of motion), spatial cognition, typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Motion expression across languages
    • 1.2Verbal and non-verbal spatial cognition
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Tasks and procedure
      • 1.Non-verbal categorization
      • 2.Verbal categorization
      • 3.Production task
    • 2.4Hypotheses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Production
    • 3.2Categorization
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Summary of results
    • 4.2Implications
      • 4.2.1Verbal and non-verbal cognition
        • 4.2.1.1Production vs. categorization
        • 4.2.1.2Verbal vs. non-verbal categorization
      • 4.2.2Event properties
      • 4.2.3“Degrees of freedom” and variation
      • 4.2.4Methodological issues
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.04hic
References (57)
References
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. 2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. 1974. Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 8 (47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. 2009. Linguistic relativity, mediation and the categorization of motion. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (46–61). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Eisenbeiss, S., & Narasimhan, B. 2001. Event triads. In S. C. Levinson, & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), ‘Manual’ for the field season 2001 (100–114). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. 2003. Space under construction: Language-specific categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (387–427). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeyer (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (239–274). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Lund, K. 2004. Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (139–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., Lambert, M., Weimar, K., Flecken, M., & von Stutterheim, C. 2012. Tracing trajectories: Motion event construal by advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition (LIA), 3(2), 202–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. 2011. Language-specificity of motion event expressions in young Korean children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition (LIA), 2(1), 157–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1–3), 83–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Hattrup, K. 2012. Relative contribution of cognition/perception and language on spatial categorization. Cognitive Science, 36, 102–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engemann, H. 2012. Motion event expression in bilingual first language acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., Soroli, E., & Vincent, C. 2015. How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French. Cognitive Processing – International Quarterly of Cognitive Science 16(supplement 1), 209–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. 2011. Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization in memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 466–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harr, A.-K. 2012. The impact of language-specific factors in first language acquisition: The expression of motion in French and German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. 2011. Expressing voluntary motion in a second language: English learners of French. In V. Cook, & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (315–339). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Demagny, A.-C. 2008. How English native speakers learn to express caused motion in English and French. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 27, 15–41.Google Scholar
Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E. S., & Katsnelson, A. S. 1999. Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2010. Linguistic relativity in first language acquisition: Spatial language and cognition. In M. Kail, & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language acquisition across linguistic and cognitive systems (125–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Robert, S. 2006. Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Champaud, C. 2009a. Typological constraints on motion in French and English child language. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (209–224). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Taranne, P., & Bonnet, P. 2009b. Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and Path in French and English child language. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 705–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Soroli, E., Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., & Vincent, C. 2014. Typological factors in the development of verbal and non-verbal spatial cognition: A comparison of French and English. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference in Cognitive Linguistics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK, 29–31 July 2014.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Y. 2009. The expression of voluntary and caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Typological and developmental perspectives. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. 2011a. The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics, 49(5), 1041–1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b. Children’s expression of voluntary motion events in English and Chinese. Journal of Foreign Languages, 34(4), 2–20.Google Scholar
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J., & Viding, E. 2004. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. 2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. A. 1992. Language diversity and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B., & Levinson, S. C. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 108–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newton, A. M., & De Villiers, J. G. 2007. Thinking while talking: Adults fail nonverbal false-belief reasoning. Psychological Science, 18, 574–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. 2009. Learning to talk about spatial motion in language-specific ways. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (263–276). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2015. Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. 2008. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. 2002. Shake, rattle, ’n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. 2010. Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 224–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, S. 2005. Relativism in the linguistic representation and cognitive conceptualization of motion events across verb-framed and satellite-framed languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. 2002. E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004. How people move: Discourse effects of linguistic typology. In C. L. Moder, & A. Martinovic-Zić (Eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures (195–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space across languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A. 2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soroli, E. 2011. Language and spatial cognition in French and in English: Crosslinguistic perspectives in aphasia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Paris 8.Google Scholar
2012. Variation in spatial language and cognition: Exploring visuo-spatial thinking and speaking cross-linguistically. Cognitive Processing – International Quarterly of Cognitive Science, 13(1), 333–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soroli, E., & Hickmann, M. 2010. Language and spatial representations in French and in English: Evidence from eye-movements. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language (581–597). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Soroli, E., Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Engemann, H., & Vincent, C. 2015. Language effects on spatial cognition? Cross-linguistic evidence and eye-tracking. Paper presented at NINJAL International Symposium: Typology and Cognition in Motion Event Descriptions. Tokyo, Japan, 24–25 January 2015.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R. 2003. Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41, 851–881.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Chen, C., Zhang, H., Xue, G., & Dong, Q. 2006. Neural substrates for forward and backward recitation of numbers and the alphabet: A close examination of the role of intraparietal sulcus and perisylvian areas. Brain Research, 1099(1), 109–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C. 2010. Translocation: Language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans (Ed.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (389–418). Sheffield, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Lesuisse, Mégane & Maarten Lemmens
2024. Looking differently at locative events: the cognitive impact of linguistic preferences. Language and Cognition 16:3 ► pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
Jeon, Jeeyoung & Min-Chang Sung
2023. L2 English learners’ verb lexicalization of motion events. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Vanek, Norbert & Xingyi Fu
2023. Low-level visual processing of motion events as a window into language-specific effects on perception. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Laws, Jacqueline, Anthony Attwood & Jeanine Treffers-Daller
2022. Unlearning the boundary-crossing constraint: processing instruction and the acquisition of motion event construal. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1089 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane
2022. Exploring the conceptualisation of locative events in French, English, and Dutch: Insights from eye-tracking on two memorisation tasks. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2020. Chapter 8. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Soroli, Efstathia, Maya Hickmann & Henriëtte Hendriks
2019. Casting an eye on motion events. In The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 66], ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
HICKMANN, Maya, Henriëtte HENDRIKS, Anne-Katharina HARR & Philippe BONNET
2018. Caused motion across child languages: a comparison of English, German, and French. Journal of Child Language 45:6 ► pp. 1247 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Granularity in the Verbalization of Events and Objects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 233], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.