Chapter published in:
Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues
Edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona and Rossella Pannain
[Human Cognitive Processing 60] 2018
► pp. 97120
References

References

Barcelona, A.
2002Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (207–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The conceptual motivation of bahuvrihi compounds in English and Spanish: Analysis of a small representative sample. In M. Brdar, M. Z. Fuchs, & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Converging and diverging trends in Cognitive Linguistics (151–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
2010Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics 21(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birgisson, B.
2012Skaldic blends out of joint: Blending theory and aesthetic conventions. Metaphor and Symbol 27(4), 283–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, M.
1993More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition (19–41). New York & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, A.
2010aBetween poetry and economy. Metonymy as a semantic principle. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds.), Tropical truth(s): The epistemology of metaphor and other tropes (245–270). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bEuphemism and truth. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds.), Tropical truth(s): The epistemology of metaphor and other tropes (355–372). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R.
2002Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (75–111). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fass, D.
1997Processing metaphor and metonymy. Greenwich & Connecticut: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
1994Poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T., & Milić, G.
2011Metonymy at the crossroads: a case of euphemisms and dysphemisms. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consesus view (147–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrero Ruiz, J.
2009Understanding tropes: At the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Herrero Ruiz, J.
2011The role of metonymy in complex tropes. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consesus view (167–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
2015Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mac Cormac, E. R.
1985A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nerlich, B.
2010Synecdoche: A trope, a whole trope, and nothing but a trope. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds.), Tropical truth(s): The epistemology of metaphor and other tropes (297–319). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G.
1995Transfers of meaning. J. Semantics 12(2), 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2007Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Antonymy, metonymy, and irony: A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Talk delivered at Third International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (GCLA-08/DGKL-08). Leipzig, Germany, September 25–27 2008.Google Scholar
2012Antonymy in language structure and use. In M. Brdar, I. Raffaelli, & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation (161–188). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Pauwels, P.
1999Putting metonymy in its place. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden, Metonymy in language and thought (255–273). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
2006Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3), 269–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P.
2013Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a green washing advertisement. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor in focus: Philosophical perspectives on metaphor use (67–82). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voßhagen, C.
1999Opposition as a metonymic principle. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (289–308). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X.
2013Interpretation of transferred epithet by means of Conceptual Integration Theory. J. Language Teaching and Research 4(5), 1072–1078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warren, B.
2006Referential metonymy. Scripta Minora of the Royal Society of Letters at Lund, 2003–2004: 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar