Chapter 4
Some contrast effects in metonymy
This chapter analyses important, variegated ways in which contrast arises in metonymy. It explores, for instance, the negative evaluation of the target achieved in de-roling, where the source chosen is a target feature that is largely irrelevant to the target’s role in a described situation, therein contrasting with other target features that would have been more appropriate. This form of contrast, amongst others, can generate irony, so that the chapter elucidates some of the complex connections between metonymy and irony. It also explores the multiple roles of contrast in transferred epithets, especially as transferred epithets can be simultaneously metonymic and metaphorical. Finally, the chapter makes contrast-related suggestions regarding the metonymy database described by Barcelona and colleagues in other chapters.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Degrees of source/target contrast in metonymy
- 3.Contrast and evaluation
-
3.1(De-)emphasis and de-personalization
- 3.2De-roling
- 3.3Irony through de-roling and other means
- 4.Transferred epithets
- 4.1The phenomenon and its metonymic aspect
-
4.2Metaphorical aspects of transferred epithets
- 5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
References
Barcelona, A.
2002 Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In
R. Dirven &
R. Pörings (Eds.),
Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (207–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.


Barnden, J. A.
2010 Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery.
Cognitive Linguistics 21(1), 1–34.


Birgisson, B.
2012 Skaldic blends out of joint: Blending theory and aesthetic conventions.
Metaphor and Symbol 27(4), 283–298.


Black, M.
1993 More about metaphor. In
A. Ortony (Ed.),
Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition (19–41). New York & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Burkhardt, A.
2010a Between poetry and economy. Metonymy as a semantic principle. In
A. Burkhardt &
B. Nerlich (Eds.),
Tropical truth(s): The epistemology of metaphor and other tropes (245–270). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.


Burkhardt, A.
2010b Euphemism and truth. In
A. Burkhardt &
B. Nerlich (Eds.),
Tropical truth(s): The epistemology of metaphor and other tropes (355–372). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.


Dirven, R.
2002 Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In
R. Dirven &
R. Pörings (Eds.),
Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (75–111). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.


Fass, D.
1997 Processing metaphor and metonymy. Greenwich & Connecticut: Ablex.

Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
1994 Poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gradečak-Erdeljić, T., & Milić, G.
Herrero Ruiz, J.
2009 Understanding tropes: At the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.

Herrero Ruiz, J.
2011 The role of metonymy in complex tropes. In
R. Benczes,
A. Barcelona, &
F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.),
Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consesus view (167–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Littlemore, J.
2015 Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.


Mac Cormac, E. R.
1985 A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nerlich, B.
2010 Synecdoche: A trope, a whole trope, and nothing but a trope. In
A. Burkhardt &
B. Nerlich (Eds.),
Tropical truth(s): The epistemology of metaphor and other tropes (297–319). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.


Nunberg, G.
1995 Transfers of meaning.
J. Semantics 12(2), 109–132.


Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2007 Metonymy. In
D. Geeraerts &
H. Cuyckens (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2008 Antonymy, metonymy, and irony: A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Talk delivered at Third International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (GCLA-08/DGKL-08). Leipzig, Germany,
September 25–27 2008.

Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2012 Antonymy in language structure and use. In
M. Brdar,
I. Raffaelli, &
M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.),
Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation (161–188). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Pauwels, P.
1999 Putting metonymy in its place. In
K.-U. Panther &
G. Radden,
Metonymy in language and thought (255–273). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.


Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
2006 Metonymy as a prototypical category.
Cognitive Linguistics 17(3), 269–316.


Pérez-Sobrino, P.
2013 Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a green washing advertisement. In
E. Gola &
F. Ervas (Eds.),
Metaphor in focus: Philosophical perspectives on metaphor use (67–82). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. In
K.-U. Panther &
G. Radden (Eds.),
Metonymy in language and thought (17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.


Wang, X.
2013 Interpretation of transferred epithet by means of Conceptual Integration Theory.
J. Language Teaching and Research 4(5), 1072–1078.


Warren, B.
2006 Referential metonymy.
Scripta Minora of the Royal Society of Letters at Lund, 2003–2004: 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.