Introduction
Evidentiality: How do you know?
Article outline
- 1.Introduction to the concept of evidentiality
- 2.The chapters in this volume
- 2.1Part I: What do we know? Knowledge and evidence
- 2.2Part II: When do we know? Accessibility of evidence in time
- 3.Conclusion and outlook
-
References
References (27)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornillie, B., Marín Arrese, J. & Wiemer, B. 2015. Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. In B. Cornillie and J. Marín Arrese (Eds.), Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 1–17.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, M. 2017. Reportative evidentials and modal subordination. Lingua, 186/187, 55–67.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
González, M., Roseano, P., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P. 2017. Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua, 186/187, 68–87.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardamagna, C. 2017. Reportative evidentiality, attribution and epistemic modality: A corpus-based diachronic study of Latin secundum NP (‘according to NP’). Language Sciences, 59, 159–179.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Haan, F. 2000. Evidentiality in Dutch. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 74–85.
de Haan, F. 2001. The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte, 9, 201–216.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, J. 2012. Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (370–394). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R. 1957. Shifters and verbal categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature. Reprinted in L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.) (1990), On language (386–392). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Kapatsinksi, V. 2012. The apprehensive: Fear as endophoric evidence and its pragmatics in English, Mandarin, and Russian. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 346–373.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindström, J., Maschler, Y., & Pekarek Doehler, S. 2016. A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 72–79.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. 2016. The epistemics of Epistemics: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 18(5), 493–499.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín Arrese, J. I. 2015. Epistemicity and stance: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. Discourse studies, 17, 210–225.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín Arrese, J. I., Haßler, G., & Carretero M. 2017. Introduction. Evidentiality revisited. In J. I. Marín Arrese, G. Haßler, & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited. Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives 1–9. [= Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, N. 2013. Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plungian, V. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 383–400.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Posio, P. 2011. Spanish subject pronoun usage and verb semantics revisited: First and second person singular subject pronouns and focusing of attention in spoken Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 777–798.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, L., Floyd, S., & Norcliffe, E. 2018. Egophoricity: An introduction. In S. Floyd, E. Norcliffe, & L. San Roque (Eds.), Egophoricity (2–77). Amsterdam: Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. 2016. Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 179–199.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Wets, Imke, Michelle Suijkerbuijk, Maria den Hartog & Helen de Hoop
Ziegeler, Debra
2023.
According to NP: A Diachronic Perspective on a Skeptical Evidential.
Journal of English Linguistics 51:2
► pp. 162 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020.
Knowing in interaction: An introduction.
Folia Linguistica 54:2
► pp. 281 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.