Introduction published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 116
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A.
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2009Evidentiality. Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language, 16, 9–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B.
2009Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16, 44–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B., Marín Arrese, J. & Wiemer, B.
2015Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. In B. Cornillie and J. Marín Arrese (Eds.), Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 1–17.Google Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
2010Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faller, M.
2017Reportative evidentials and modal subordination. Lingua, 186/187, 55–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
González, M., Roseano, P., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P.
2017Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua, 186/187, 68–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guardamagna, C.
2017Reportative evidentiality, attribution and epistemic modality: A corpus-based diachronic study of Latin secundum NP (‘according to NP’). Language Sciences, 59, 159–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, F.
2000Evidentiality in Dutch. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 74–85.
2001The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte, 9, 201–216.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M.
2015Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
2012Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (370–394). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1957Shifters and verbal categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature. Reprinted in L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.) (1990), On language (386–392). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Kapatsinksi, V.
2012The apprehensive: Fear as endophoric evidence and its pragmatics in English, Mandarin, and Russian. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 346–373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, J., Maschler, Y., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
2016A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 72–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D.
2016The epistemics of Epistemics: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 18(5), 493–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, J. I.
2015Epistemicity and stance: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. Discourse studies, 17, 210–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, J. I., Haßler, G., & Carretero M.
2017Introduction. Evidentiality revisited. In J. I. Marín Arrese, G. Haßler, & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited. Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives 1–9. [= Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, N.
2013Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Plungian, V.
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 383–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Posio, P.
2011Spanish subject pronoun usage and verb semantics revisited: First and second person singular subject pronouns and focusing of attention in spoken Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 777–798.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, L., Floyd, S., & Norcliffe, E.
2018Egophoricity: An introduction. In S. Floyd, E. Norcliffe, & L. San Roque (Eds.), Egophoricity (2–77). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.
2002‘Object complements’ and conversation. Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A.
2016Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 179–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar