Cover not available
Part of
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 1–16

Introduction

Evidentiality: How do you know?

| Radboud University Nijmegen
| Radboud University Nijmegen
| Radboud University Nijmegen
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction to the concept of evidentiality
  • 2.The chapters in this volume
    • 2.1Part I: What do we know? Knowledge and evidence
    • 2.2Part II: When do we know? Accessibility of evidence in time
  • 3.Conclusion and outlook
  • References
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.01foo
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A.
1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2009 Evidentiality. Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language, 16, 9–43.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B., Marín Arrese, J. & Wiemer, B.
2015 Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. In B. Cornillie and J. Marín Arrese (Eds.), Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 1–17.Google Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
2010 Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, M.
2017 Reportative evidentials and modal subordination. Lingua, 186/187, 55–67.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
1981 Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
González, M., Roseano, P., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P.
2017 Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua, 186/187, 68–87.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guardamagna, C.
2017 Reportative evidentiality, attribution and epistemic modality: A corpus-based diachronic study of Latin secundum NP (‘according to NP’). Language Sciences, 59, 159–179.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Haan, F.
2000 Evidentiality in Dutch. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 74–85.
2001 The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte, 9, 201–216.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M.
2015 Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
2012 Epistemics in conversation. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (370–394). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1957 Shifters and verbal categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature. Reprinted in L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.) (1990), On language (386–392). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Kapatsinksi, V.
2012 The apprehensive: Fear as endophoric evidence and its pragmatics in English, Mandarin, and Russian. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 346–373.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, J., Maschler, Y., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
2016 A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 72–79.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D.
2016 The epistemics of Epistemics: An introduction. Discourse Studies, 18(5), 493–499.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, J. I.
2015 Epistemicity and stance: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. Discourse studies, 17, 210–225.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, J. I., Haßler, G., & Carretero M.
2017 Introduction. Evidentiality revisited. In J. I. Marín Arrese, G. Haßler, & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited. Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives 1–9. [= Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N.
2013 Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Plungian, V.
2001 The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 383–400.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posio, P.
2011 Spanish subject pronoun usage and verb semantics revisited: First and second person singular subject pronouns and focusing of attention in spoken Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 777–798.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, L., Floyd, S., & Norcliffe, E.
2018 Egophoricity: An introduction. In S. Floyd, E. Norcliffe, & L. San Roque (Eds.), Egophoricity (2–77). Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.
2002 ‘Object complements’ and conversation. Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–163.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A.
2016 Production-comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 179–199.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Wets, Imke, Michelle Suijkerbuijk, Maria den Hartog & Helen de Hoop
2023. Argument doubling with proper nouns in spoken Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 40 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Ziegeler, Debra
2023. According to NP: A Diachronic Perspective on a Skeptical Evidential. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.